Radian Group Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Radian Group Inc (RDN) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Radian Group Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 1,645M vs 58,273M combined for tracked competitors (2.7% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+39.8% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+2.7%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Radian Group Inc generated 92.6% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs -2.3% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 20.2% net margin compares with 18.5% for the peer group.
- Scale: Radian Group Inc ranks #28 of 65 companies by market capitalization in the Property & Casualty Insurance industry, holding 0.2% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Radian Group Inc accounted for 3.7% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 1.9% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $1.83M compares with $1.44M for the peer group (1.3x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
RDN Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Radian Group Inc reported revenue growth of 92.58 % year on year in Q2 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue change of -2.33 %.
With a net margin of 20.16 %, Radian Group Inc achieved higher profitability than its competitors (18.46 %).
Radian Group Inc generated 3.70 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 1.91 % a year earlier.
Radian Group Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Radian Group Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Radian Group Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Radian Group Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Property & Casualty Insurance industry grew revenue 5.6% year over year, combined, vs 92.6% for Radian Group Inc. Radian Group Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.12% to 0.21%, a gain of 0.09 percentage points.
Radian Group Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radian Group Inc | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (10) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
RDN Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
RDN Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
RDN Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mr Cooper Group Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Enact Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Arch Capital Group Ltd | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Nmi Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Genworth Financial Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Radian Group Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Radian Group Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
We operate in the highly competitive U.S. mortgage insurance industry. Our
competitors include other private mortgage insurers and federal and state governmental
and quasi-governmental agencies, principally the FHA and VA.
We compete directly with the following six private mortgage insurers:
Arch U.S. MI (acquired CMG Mortgage Company effective January 30, 2014);
Essent Guaranty Inc.;
Genworth Financial Inc.;
Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation;
NMI Holdings, Inc.; and
United Guaranty Corporation.
We compete with other private mortgage insurers primarily on the basis of price, underwriting guidelines, customer relationships, reputation, perceived financial strength (including based on credit ratings) and overall service. Service-based competition includes effective and timely delivery of products, timeliness of claims payments, customer service, timely and accurate servicing of policies, training, loss mitigation efforts and management and field service expertise. Pricing has always been competitive in the mortgage insurance industry. However, the presence of newer entrants in the industry has increased price competition as these companies seek to gain a greater presence in the market and more established industry participants seek to defend their market share and customer relationships. As a result, recent pricing trends have included: (i) the increased use of a spectrum of filed rates to allow for formulaic, risk-based pricing (commonly referred to as “black-box” pricing); (ii) a significant increase in the broad use of customized (often discounted) rates on lender-paid, Single Premium policies, and more recently, on borrower-paid, monthly premium policies; and (iii) overall reductions in standard filed rates on borrower-paid policies. The willingness of mortgage insurers to offer reduced pricing (through filed or customized rates) has been met with an increased demand from certain large lenders for reduced rate products. This has further intensified the pricing environment and has resulted in new pricing levels (whether through filed or customized rates) that private mortgage insurers are expected to meet in order to avoid risking a potential significant loss in NIW.
The heightened pricing competition has occurred in the context of generally
higher capital requirements being applied to private mortgage insurers as a
result of the PMIERs and more aggressive pricing by the FHA (which is most impactful
with respect to high-LTV loans for borrowers with FICO scores below 720). This
has produced a marketplace where balancing both targeted returns on new business
and an acceptable share of the insured market has become increasingly challenging
for all participants. In formulating our strategy in this environment, we have
taken a disciplined approach to establishing rates and delivering a mix of business
that is expected to produce our targeted level of returns on a blended basis
and an acceptable level of NIW. In furtherance of this strategy, we recently:
(1) increased our filed rates for lender-paid mortgage insurance; (2) continued
to use the authority set forth in our rate filings to provide customized premiums
for lender-paid, Single Premium mortgage insurance on a selective and negotiated
basis while, importantly, declining to participate in significantly discounted,
Single Premium business that has been offered for bid on an aggregated basis
(which we estimate represented approximately 5% of the total private mortgage
insurance market in 2015); and (3) determined to change our borrower-paid, filed
rates in order to remain competitive, which generally will have the effect of
decreasing our standard rates on higher FICO business and raising our rates
on lower FICO business where the FHA is already very competitive.
We believe our Services business is uniquely positioned as a single provider
of an array of outsourced services and solutions to participants in the mortgage
value chain and that this position differentiates us from our competitors. We
are not aware of any other company that provides a comparable range of services
to the residential mortgage and real estate industries. However, our Services
business has multiple competitors within each of its individual lines of business.
Our competitors mainly include small privately-held companies and subsidiaries
of large publicly-traded companies.
Significant competitors within each of our business lines include:
Loan Review and Due Diligence – American Mortgage Consultants, Inc. and
JCIII & Associates (consolidated in a business combination as American Mortgage
Consultants, Inc., effective December 2015), Digital Risk, LLC, LenderLive Network,
Inc., Opus Capital Markets Consultants, LLC and Stewart Lender Services, Inc.
Surveillance – CoreLogic, Inc., Digital Risk, LLC, FTI Consulting, Inc.,
Pentalpha Surveillance LLC and Promontory Financial Group, LLC
Valuation and Component Services – Carrington Property Services, LLC,
ClearCapital.com, Inc., CoreLogic, Inc., Pro Teck Valuation Services, First
American, Collateral Analytics and Black Knight Financial Services
REO Management – Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.A., Solutionstar Holdings
LLC, Stewart Lender Services, Inc. and VRM Mortgage Services
EuroRisk – Deloitte LLP, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Ernst & Young
LLP, KPMG LLP, Situs Group, LLC, Euristix Ltd, Rockstead Ltd and Grant Thornton
Across all business lines, we compete on the basis of industry expertise, price,
technology, service levels and relationships.
Publicly Traded Peers of Radian Group Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Radian Group Inc | 4,468.72 | 1,644.99 |
| American International Group Inc | 39,455.17 | 26,636.00 |
| Arch Capital Group Ltd | 33,137.74 | 19,232.00 |
| Mr Cooper Group Inc | 13,721.16 | 2,246.00 |
| Enact Holdings Inc | 6,545.69 | 1,253.54 |
| Mgic Investment Corp | 5,952.87 | 1,195.62 |
| SUBTOTAL | 117,598.62 | 62,163.70 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Radian Group Inc.
Sources: Radian Group Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Radian Group Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Radian Group Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Nmi Holdings Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Arch Capital Group Ltd | Named by the company | 85% |
| Enact Holdings Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Black Box Corp | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Radian Group Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Radian Group Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Radian Group Inc | Specialty segment operating 51.02 % |
| American International Group Inc | North America Operating 30.08 % |
| Arch Capital Group Ltd | Insurance 40.27 % |
| Mr Cooper Group Inc | Servicing 71.38 % |
| Essent Group Ltd | Mortgage Insurance 75.52 % |
| Genworth Financial Inc | Closed Block 83.12 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Radian Group Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radian Group Inc | 4,469 | 1,827,771 | 595,881 |
| American International Group Inc | 39,455 | 1,205,249 | 134,208 |
| Arch Capital Group Ltd | 33,138 | 2,404,000 | 586,500 |
| Mr Cooper Group Inc | 13,721 | 330,294 | 63,676 |
| Enact Holdings Inc | 6,546 | 2,991,737 | 1,630,711 |
| Mgic Investment Corp | 5,953 | 2,205,945 | 1,306,002 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 113,130 | 1,441,986 | 261,602 |
Radian Group Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 65 companies in Radian Group Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Radian Group Inc ranks #28 of 65 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.24 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 3,552, indicating a highly concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Chubb Limited | 130,320 | 7.02 % |
| 3 | Progressive Corp | 122,285 | 6.59 % |
| 4 | Travelers Companies inc | 77,573 | 4.18 % |
| 5 | Allstate Corp | 58,619 | 3.16 % |
| 6 | American International Group Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | The Hartford Insurance Group Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Arch Capital Group Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | W R Berkley Corp | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 11 | Markel Group Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 28 | Radian Group Inc | 4,469 | 0.24 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Radian Group Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-29.
Radian Group Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23 | Essent Group Ltd | 5,792 | -0.96 % |
| 24 | Mercury General Corporation | 5,464 | 19.78 % |
| 25 | Selective Insurance Group Inc | 5,142 | 8.66 % |
| 26 | Rli Corp | 5,125 | -7.37 % |
| 27 | White Mountains Insurance Group ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 28 | Radian Group Inc | 4,469 | -9.34 % |
| 29 | Lemonade Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 30 | Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 31 | Palomar Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 32 | Nmi Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 33 | Assured Guaranty ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Radian Group Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-29. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Radian Group Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Property & Casualty Insurance industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (75 companies). See the full Property & Casualty Insurance industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | - | 49.36 % (avg) | - |
| Operating Margin | - | industry median | - |
| EBITDA Margin | 53.24 % | 13.82 % (avg) | +39.4 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.16 % | 0.95 % (avg) | -0.8 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Radian Group Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Property & Casualty Insurance industry average (75 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Property & Casualty Insurance industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 9.5x | 13.2x | -3.8x |
| EV / EBITDA | 1.5x | 6.2x | -4.7x |
| P/B | 1.0x | 1.9x | -0.9x |
| Return on Equity | 11.26 % | industry aggregate | -3.43 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | 5.86 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Radian Group Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 4.21 % | 19.95 % | -5.79 % | -7.55 % | 0.00 % | -6.72 % | 2.14 % | -2.15 % |
| Operating Margin | 83.16 % | 77.89 % | 53.26 % | 82.78 % | 59.15 % | 90.98 % | 99.48 % | 89.15 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 11.64 % | 11.65 % | 6.91 % | 9.47 % | 7.12 % | 9.62 % | 9.77 % | 8.56 % |
| P/E | 5.2x | 6.5x | 9.9x | 6.9x | 5.7x | 7.3x | 8.1x | 8.3x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Radian Group Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Radian Group Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Radian Group Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.03x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 5.9% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Radian Group Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Low | Industry HHI of 3,552 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.16 % vs industry average 0.95 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Radian Group Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Radian Group Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Radian Group Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Radian Group Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Radian Group Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+39.8% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.03x).
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (50.00 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Radian Group Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radian Group Inc | 0.07 | 2.53 | 0.25 |
| American International Group Inc | 0.04 | 1.44 | 0.17 |
| Arch Capital Group Ltd | 0.29 | 3.48 | 0.13 |
| Mr Cooper Group Inc | 0.23 | 0.19 | 2.40 |
| Enact Holdings Inc | - | - | 0.14 |
| Mgic Investment Corp | 0.29 | 1.86 | 0.13 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Radian Group Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radian Group Inc | Q2 2026 | +92.6 % | -18.3 % |
| American International Group Inc | Q2 2026 | -0.1 % | -17.1 % |
| Arch Capital Group Ltd | Q2 2026 | -10.5 % | -14.6 % |
| Mr Cooper Group Inc | Q2 2025 | +4.3 % | -1.2 % |
| Enact Holdings Inc | Q2 2026 | +4.1 % | +4.2 % |
| Mgic Investment Corp | Q2 2026 | -2.9 % | -5.4 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | -0.3 % | -10.3 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Radian Group Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radian Group Inc | Q2 2026 | - | -82.5 % |
| American International Group Inc | Q2 2026 | +6.3 % | - |
| Arch Capital Group Ltd | Q2 2026 | -12.9 % | +16.7 % |
| Mr Cooper Group Inc | Q2 2025 | - | +62.5 % |
| Enact Holdings Inc | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| Mgic Investment Corp | Q2 2026 | -71.6 % | +2,265.0 % |
Radian Group Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radian Group Inc | 5.70% | 6.77% | 11.26% |
| American International Group Inc | 1.83% | 2.10% | 7.26% |
| Arch Capital Group Ltd | 5.77% | 6.76% | 19.52% |
| Mr Cooper Group Inc | 2.40% | 1.89% | 8.91% |
| Enact Holdings Inc | 9.87% | 10.78% | 12.76% |
| Mgic Investment Corp | 10.80% | 11.66% | 13.90% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Radian Group Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Radian Group Inc | 8.47 | 2.72 |
| American International Group Inc | 13.67 | 1.48 |
| Arch Capital Group Ltd | 7.47 | 1.72 |
| Mr Cooper Group Inc | 24.17 | 6.11 |
| Enact Holdings Inc | 9.88 | 5.22 |
| Mgic Investment Corp | 8.90 | 4.98 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 10.21 | 1.89 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.
