Quality Industrial's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Quality Industrial (QIND) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Quality Industrial vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 16M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-11.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Peer revenue share: Quality Industrial accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
QIND Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Quality Industrial generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Industrial Machinery and Components industry grew revenue 12.4% year over year, combined, vs -11.9% for Quality Industrial. Quality Industrial's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Quality Industrial's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality Industrial Corp. | No | Yes | Yes | - |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
QIND Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
QIND Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
Quality Industrial's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Quality Industrial's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Lahej & Sultan | Named by the company | 85% |
| Royal Development for Gas Works | Named by the company | 85% |
| Al Fanar Gas | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Quality Industrial's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.