Outdoor Holding's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Outdoor Holding (POWW) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Outdoor Holding vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 52M vs 6,703M combined for tracked competitors (0.8% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+10.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+3.9%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Outdoor Holding generated 27.8% revenue growth year over year in Q1 2026, vs -0.9% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 24.7% net margin compares with -0.8% for the peer group.
- Scale: Outdoor Holding ranks #39 of 56 companies by market capitalization in the Aerospace & Defense industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Outdoor Holding accounted for 0.8% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.6% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.83M compares with $0.85M for the peer group (1.0x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
POWW Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2026
Outdoor Holding reported revenue growth of 27.75 % year on year in Q1 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue change of -0.93 %.
With a net margin of 24.68 %, Outdoor Holding achieved higher profitability than its competitors (-0.76 %).
Outdoor Holding generated 0.82 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.64 % a year earlier.
Outdoor Holding vs. its Competitors, Q1 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Outdoor Holding and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Outdoor Holding Company | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Outdoor Holding's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Aerospace & Defense industry grew revenue 13.0% year over year, combined, vs 27.8% for Outdoor Holding. Outdoor Holding's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.01% to 0.01%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Outdoor Holding's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor Holding Company | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (1) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (4) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 42.90 % (3 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
POWW Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
POWW Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
POWW Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
POWW Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Olin Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Outdoor Holding's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Outdoor Holding's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Outdoor Holding Company
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Outdoor Holding Company | 281.55 | 52.47 |
| Olin Corporation | 1,828.10 | 6,703.20 |
| SUBTOTAL | 2,109.64 | 6,755.67 |
Sources: Outdoor Holding Company's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Outdoor Holding Company versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Outdoor Holding's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Federal Premium Ammunition | Named by the company | 85% |
| Hornady Manufacturing Company | Named by the company | 85% |
| Remington Arms | Named by the company | 85% |
| Wolf Ammunition | Named by the company | 85% |
| Cabela’s | Named by the company | 85% |
| GunBroker.com | Named by the company | 85% |
| Palmetto State Armory | Named by the company | 85% |
| University of Louisiana at Lafayette | Named by the company | 85% |
| Bass Pro Shops | Named by the company | 85% |
| Fiocchi Ammunition | Named by the company | 85% |
| Jagemann Stamping Company | Named by the company | 85% |
| Rio Ammunition | Named by the company | 85% |
| Academy Sports | Named by the company | 85% |
| CBC Group | Named by the company | 85% |
| Hallam, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| PMC | Named by the company | 85% |
| Winchester Ammunition division of Olin Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Black-Hills Ammunition | Named by the company | 85% |
| Freedom Munitions | Named by the company | 85% |
| Jesse James Firearms, LLC | Named by the company | 85% |
| Sportsman’s Warehouse | Named by the company | 85% |
| AMMO Technologies Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Olin Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Outdoor Holding's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Outdoor Holding's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Olin Corporation | Chlor Alkali Products and Vinyls 47.05 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Outdoor Holding's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor Holding Company | 282 | 832,932 | 103,091 |
| Olin Corporation | 1,828 | 854,020 | -24,946 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 1,828 | 854,020 | -24,946 |
Outdoor Holding's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Olin Corporation | United States 69.52 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Outdoor Holding's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 49 companies in Outdoor Holding's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Outdoor Holding ranks #39 of 49 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.04 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 915, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Boeing Company | 150,084 | 18.81 % |
| 2 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | 120,403 | 15.09 % |
| 3 | Northrop Grumman Corp | 72,957 | 9.15 % |
| 4 | Transdigm Group Incorporated | 63,140 | 7.91 % |
| 5 | Garmin Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Rocket Lab Corp | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | L3harris Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Axon Enterprise Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Elbit Systems Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Teledyne Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 39 | Outdoor Holding Company | 284 | 0.04 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Outdoor Holding's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Outdoor Holding's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34 | Eve Holding Inc | 751 | -46.25 % |
| 35 | Sturm Ruger and Company Inc | 688 | 1.82 % |
| 36 | Smith and Wesson Brands Inc | 647 | 50.48 % |
| 37 | Park Aerospace Corp | 629 | 57.16 % |
| 38 | Ehang Holdings Limited | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 39 | Outdoor Holding Company | 284 | 52.67 % |
| 40 | Airo Group Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 41 | Applied Energetics Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 42 | Fact Ii Acquisition Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 43 | Coda Octopus Group Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 44 | Wrap Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Outdoor Holding's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Outdoor Holding's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (56 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 88.63 % | 30.24 % (avg) | +58.4 pp |
| Operating Margin | 5.74 % | industry median | +0.9 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 64.15 % | 4.83 % (avg) | +59.3 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | - | 7.10 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Outdoor Holding's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Aerospace & Defense industry average (56 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 102.9x | 36.0x | +66.9x |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.9x | 21.5x | -15.6x |
| P/B | 1.1x | 5.2x | -4.1x |
| Return on Equity | 2.80 % | industry aggregate | -26.84 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 0.63 % | 2.69 % (avg) | -2.06 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Outdoor Holding's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 160.63 % | 237.46 % | 277.99 % | 351.49 % | 11.18 % | -36.69 % | -14.91 % | -105.29 % |
| Operating Margin | -222.07 % | -114.11 % | -21.40 % | 17.52 % | 1.32 % | -7.44 % | -30.56 % | 458.47 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -31.72 % | -24.83 % | -14.82 % | 6.13 % | 0.37 % | -1.51 % | -5.46 % | -6.52 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | 22.3x | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Outdoor Holding's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Outdoor Holding's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Outdoor Holding is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Outdoor Holding's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Outdoor Holding's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Outdoor Holding falls in the Question Mark quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 15.0% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Outdoor Holding's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 915 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Outdoor Holding's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Outdoor Holding's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Outdoor Holding's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Outdoor Holding falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Outdoor Holding's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+10.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 26.8 points below the industry aggregate.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 15.0% median pace.
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (100.00 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Outdoor Holding's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor Holding Company | 1.89 | 2.56 | 0.01 |
| Olin Corporation | 0.06 | 1.38 | 1.62 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Outdoor Holding's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor Holding Company | Q2 2026 | +27.8 % | - |
| Olin Corporation | Q2 2026 | -0.9 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | -0.7 % | - |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Outdoor Holding's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor Holding Company | Q2 2026 | +123.8 % | -24.8 % |
| Olin Corporation | Q2 2026 | -3.0 % | -6.5 % |
Outdoor Holding's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor Holding Company | 2.36% | 2.63% | 2.80% |
| Olin Corporation | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Outdoor Holding's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Outdoor Holding Company | 113.50 | 5.37 |
| Olin Corporation | - | 0.27 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | - | 0.31 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.