Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Psychemedics's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Psychemedics (PMD) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2024
Competitors Tracked
8
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
0.02 %
vs 0.03 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-18.80 %
Peers: 7.18 %
Net Margin
4.31 %
Peers: 12.38 %

Key Findings: Psychemedics vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 19M vs 74,994M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-8.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-4.4%) for its tracked peer group.
  • Growth: Psychemedics generated -18.8% revenue growth year over year in Q4 2024, vs 7.2% for its tracked competitors combined.
  • Profitability: Its 4.3% net margin compares with 12.4% for the peer group.
  • Peer revenue share: Psychemedics accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 0.0% a year earlier.
  • Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.19M compares with $0.29M for the peer group (0.7x).

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

PMD Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2024

Psychemedics reported revenue contraction of 18.80 % year on year in Q4 2024, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 7.18 %.

With a net margin of 4.31 %, Psychemedics reported lower profitability than its competitors (12.38 %).

Psychemedics generated 0.02 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 0.03 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/PMD/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/PMD/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/PMD/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Psychemedics vs. its Competitors, Q4 2024

Revenue growth, year on year

Psychemedics -18.8 %
Competitors combined +7.2 %

Net margin

Psychemedics +4.3 %
Competitors combined +12.4 %

Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months

Psychemedics -8.1 %
Competitors combined -4.4 %

TTM net margin

Psychemedics -9.7 %
Competitors combined +12.0 %

TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.

Competitor Financial Benchmarking - TTM Commercial

TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Psychemedics and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.

Entity TTM Revenue Latest Q ×4 Rev Run-rate vs TTM TTM Net Income TTM Net Margin
Psychemedics Corporation $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitors combined $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Similar Growth & Profitability (5) $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitor Financial Benchmarking

TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Psychemedics's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

For context: the Medical Laboratories industry grew revenue 5.7% year over year, combined, vs -18.8% for Psychemedics. Psychemedics's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.01% to 0.01%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Psychemedics's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Psychemedics Corporation No No No No
Competitors combined (8) 67% 86% 86% 50%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 0.00 % (0 of 8) 50.00 % (4 of 8) 12.50 % (1 of 8) 62.50 % (5 of 8)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q4 2024

0%market share
  • Psychemedics0.0%
  • Competitors combined100.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Psychemedics and its 8 tracked competitors.

See Psychemedics's full market share breakdown »

PMD Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

PMD Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Psychemedics's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
25%beat U.S.A. 500
Competitors Combined
(2 of 8)
60%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(3 of 5)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Psychemedics Corporation -10.10 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (8) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (5) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Psychemedics's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

PMD Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

PMD Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months

#CompetitorTTM Share Price Returnvs U.S.A. 500
1 Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 282.9% Outperformed
2 Quest Diagnostics Inc 282.9% Outperformed
3 Labcorp Holdings Inc 282.9% Outperformed
4 Fulgent Genetics Inc 282.9% Outperformed
5 Radnet Inc 282.9% Outperformed
Best-Performing Competitor Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Psychemedics's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.

Psychemedics's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company competes by promoting its patented hair analysis method, which provides higher detection rates and a longer detection window than urinalysis. Its prices are slightly higher than those of urinalysis tests, which may affect volume growth. The company also competes with other hair testing laboratories, distinguishing itself through the results of its proprietary method.

Publicly Traded Peers of Psychemedics Corporation

Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees
Company Market Cap Revenues Income Employees
Psychemedics Corporation 15.66 19.10 -1.86 101
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 251,760.60 46,336.00 6,989.00 125,000
Quest Diagnostics Inc 26,613.44 11,560.00 1,113.00 57,000
Labcorp Holdings Inc 25,384.74 14,348.00 1,003.50 70,000
Radnet Inc 5,653.67 2,268.93 19.27 7,872
Fulgent Genetics Inc 626.19 322.97 -85.47 1,344
SUBTOTAL 310,261.19 75,013.23 9,016.32 261,552
3 more competitors available

Sign in to see all competitors of Psychemedics Corporation.

Sources: Psychemedics Corporation's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Psychemedics Corporation versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.

Psychemedics's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Quest Diagnostics Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Psychemedics's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Psychemedics's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).
Company Largest Segment 2nd Segment 3rd Segment
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc Clinical Research 19.98 % Research and Safety Market Channel 16.98 % Pharma Services 15.78 %
Quest Diagnostics Inc Diagnostic Information Services Business 97.86 % Other Operating 2.14 % -
Labcorp Holdings Inc Diagnostics 78.08 % Biopharma Laboratory Services 22.07 % -
Radnet Inc Imaging Centers 96.64 % Digital Health 5.21 % -
Fulgent Genetics Inc Precision Diagnostics 57.08 % Anatomic Pathology 35.58 % Biopharma Services 8.13 %

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).

1 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Psychemedics Corporation.

Psychemedics's Productivity vs Peers Comparison

Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $
CompanyMarket CapRevenue / EmployeeIncome / Employee
Psychemedics Corporation 16 189,119 -18,426
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 251,761 370,688 55,912
Quest Diagnostics Inc 26,613 202,807 19,526
Labcorp Holdings Inc 25,385 204,971 14,336
Radnet Inc 5,654 288,228 2,448
Fulgent Genetics Inc 626 240,307 -63,593
PEERS TOTAL 310,246 286,838 34,493
3 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Psychemedics Corporation.

Psychemedics's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers

Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.
Company Largest Market 2nd Market 3rd Market
Psychemedics Corporation US 97.59 % - -
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc North America 51.27 % Europe 27.61 % Asia Pacific 17.54 %
Fulgent Genetics Inc Other countries 4.93 % - -

Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.

Psychemedics's Position in Industry Market Structure

Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 42 companies in Psychemedics's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.

Psychemedics ranks #0 of 42 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 860, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).

Rank Company Market Cap Industry Share
1 Natera Inc 58,913 16.93 %
2 Iqvia Holdings Inc 45,638 13.12 %
3 Ge Healthcare Technologies Inc 30,422 8.74 %
4 Quest Diagnostics Inc 26,362 7.58 %
5 Incyte Corporation 1,234 5.2%
6 Labcorp Holdings Inc 1,234 5.2%
7 Guardant Health Inc 1,234 5.2%
8 Koninklijke Philips Nv 1,234 5.2%
9 Medpace Holdings Inc 1,234 5.2%
10 Charles River Laboratories International inc 1,234 5.2%
0 Psychemedics Corporation 16 0.00 %
Full Industry Market Structure

Market cap and industry share for the rest of Psychemedics's industry peers requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-03-02.

Psychemedics's Profitability & Cost Structure

Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Medical Laboratories industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (58 companies).
Metric Company Industry Difference
Gross Margin 37.18 % 43.57 % (avg) -6.4 pp
Operating Margin -9.91 % industry median +5.9 pp
EBITDA Margin -10.03 % -4.90 % (avg) -5.1 pp
Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) 0.46 % 9.54 % (avg) -9.1 pp

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.

Psychemedics's Valuation vs Competitive Position

Valuation multiples vs the Medical Laboratories industry average (58 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.
Metric Company Industry Average Difference
P/E - 37.0x -
EV / EBITDA - 18.0x -
P/B 2.8x 2.9x -0.1x
Return on Equity -32.94 % industry aggregate -37.47 %
Return on Invested Capital -15.91 % -4.04 % (avg) -11.87 %

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.

Psychemedics's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory

Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.
Metric 20172018201920202021202220232024
Revenue Growth 1.85 %7.49 %-11.71 %-43.31 %16.62 %1.33 %-15.16 %-10.80 %
Operating Margin 20.55 %17.83 %7.96 %-28.40 %0.84 %-4.29 %-13.64 %-9.91 %
Return on Invested Capital 21.30 %18.93 %7.60 %-17.50 %0.66 %-4.13 %-16.09 %-15.91 %
P/E 18.0x20.6x34.7x-----

Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.

Psychemedics's Strategic Group Map

Every company in Psychemedics's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Psychemedics is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.

Revenue Growth (TTM, %)Operating Margin (%)MEDDCSTLNOTVPsychemedicsBNRAMSFTREKSHBAKU

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.

Psychemedics's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)

Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.
Force Assessment Basis
Competitive Rivalry High Industry HHI of 860 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above)
Barriers to Entry Lower than typical for the industry Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.46 % vs industry average 9.54 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above)
Supplier Power Not covered on this page See Psychemedics's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data
Buyer Power Not covered on this page See Psychemedics's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data
Threat of Substitutes - No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated

Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.

Psychemedics's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength

A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.

High Strength
Medium Strength
Low Strength
High Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Invest / Grow
Selective
Medium Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Selective
Harvest
Low Attractiveness
Selective
Harvest
Harvest / Divest Psychemedics

Psychemedics falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.

Psychemedics's SWOT

Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.

Strengths

  • Operating margin 5.9 points above the industry median.

Weaknesses

  • Return on equity 37.5 points below the industry aggregate.
  • Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-8.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.

Opportunities

  • A meaningful share of tracked competitors (50.00 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.

Threats

  • Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-4.4% annualized).

Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.

Psychemedics's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison

Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months
CompanyQuick RatioWorking CapitalDebt / EquityAsset Turnover
Psychemedics Corporation 0.39 1.61 0.03 1.94
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 0.32 1.62 0.78 0.42
Quest Diagnostics Inc 0.22 1.22 0.76 0.70
Labcorp Holdings Inc 0.22 1.61 0.66 0.77
Radnet Inc 1.10 1.61 0.86 0.58
Fulgent Genetics Inc 0.68 6.24 0.00 0.28
3 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Psychemedics Corporation.

Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Psychemedics's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers

Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodRevenue Y/YRevenue Q/QIncome Y/YIncome Q/Q
Psychemedics CorporationQ4 2024-18.8 %-12.9 %--
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc Q2 2026+10.5 %+9.0 %+7.6 %+5.1 %
Quest Diagnostics IncQ2 2026+10.2 %+5.1 %+12.8 %+26.5 %
Labcorp Holdings Inc Q2 2026+5.8 %+5.5 %+25.5 %+7.6 %
Radnet Inc Q2 2026+25.0 %+8.2 %-12.1 %-
Fulgent Genetics Inc Q2 2026+4.9 %+21.1 %--
PEERS TOTAL+9.9 %+7.7 %+9.4 %+9.9 %
3 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Psychemedics Corporation.

Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Psychemedics's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures

Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodCosts Y/YCosts Q/QCapex Y/YCapex Q/Q
Psychemedics CorporationQ4 2024-10.3 %+0.0 %+4.0 %+85.7 %
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc Q2 2026+142.5 %+140.8 %+53.1 %+19.7 %
Quest Diagnostics IncQ2 2026+10.9 %+3.2 %+27.8 %+21.1 %
Labcorp Holdings Inc Q2 2026+5.6 %+3.8 %+68.9 %+8.8 %
Radnet Inc Q2 2026---16.4 %-81.9 %
Fulgent Genetics Inc Q2 2026+27.0 %+21.9 %-43.5 %-25.8 %
3 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Psychemedics Corporation.

Psychemedics's Returns and Turnover vs Peers

ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover
CompanyROAROIROEReceivables TurnoverInventory Turnover
Psychemedics Corporation---5.98-
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 6.36%7.71%13.37%5.083.26
Quest Diagnostics Inc6.74%8.05%14.85%7.5637.13
Labcorp Holdings Inc 5.40%6.11%11.58%6.4919.29
Radnet Inc 0.50%0.45%1.42%10.53-
Fulgent Genetics Inc ---4.45-
3 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Psychemedics Corporation.

ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).

Psychemedics's Valuation vs Peers

P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book
CompanyP/EPrice / SalesPEGP/CFPrice / Book
Psychemedics Corporation-0.82--3.05
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 36.525.432.95-4.78
Quest Diagnostics Inc25.172.301.3486.693.40
Labcorp Holdings Inc 25.631.770.65-2.95
Radnet Inc -2.49--4.06
Fulgent Genetics Inc -1.94--0.63
PEERS AVERAGE34.414.14-4.34
3 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Psychemedics Corporation.

P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.