Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Plum Acquisition I's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Plum Acquisition I (PLMIU) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q2 2026
Competitors
5
Named by the company
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
141.64 %
Q2 2026
Net Margin
-2,284.58 %
Q2 2026

Key Findings: Plum Acquisition I vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 0M vs -M combined for its competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+43.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Peer revenue share: Plum Acquisition I accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

PLMIU Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026

Plum Acquisition I generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset

https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/PLMIU/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/PLMIU/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/PLMIU/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.
Explore the Financial Data API

For context: the Cloud Computing & Data Analytics industry grew revenue 8.1% year over year, combined, vs 141.6% for Plum Acquisition I. Plum Acquisition I's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Plum Acquisition I's Competitor Quality Breadth

Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Plum Acquisition Corp I - Yes Yes No
Competitors combined (1) - - - 100%
High-Confidence Competitors (3) 100% 100% 33% 33%

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q2 2026

100%market share
  • Plum Acquisition I100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Plum Acquisition I and its 5 competitors.

See Plum Acquisition I's full market share breakdown »

PLMIU Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

PLMIU Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Plum Acquisition I's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
0%beat U.S.A. 500
Competitors Combined
(0 of 1)
33.3%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(1 of 3)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Plum Acquisition Corp I - -
Competitors combined (1) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (3) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Plum Acquisition I's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

PLMIU Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

PLMIU High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 3) Percent change over the selected range

5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months

#CompetitorTTM Share Price Returnvs U.S.A. 500
1 Alpha Partners Technology Merger Corp 282.9% Outperformed
Best-Performing Competitor Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Plum Acquisition I's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.

Plum Acquisition I's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company provides cybersecurity services and additional edge services through its AirLynxâ„¢ Service Platform, delivered via the VeeaONE platform. It holds patents and relies on trade secrets and confidentiality agreements to protect its competitive position. According to an Ericsson forecast, global Fixed Wireless Access subscriptions are expected to grow at an annual rate of 19% from 2022 to 2028, reaching over 300 million devices by 2028. The indoor Wi-Fi access point market is projected to increase from $17.2 billion in 2024 to $32.2 billion by 2032, with a compound annual growth rate of 8.2%. Ericsson is identified as a competitor in the company's filings. Customer retention is reported to be longer than average.

Publicly Traded Peers of Plum Acquisition Corp I

Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees
Company Market Cap Revenues Income Employees
Plum Acquisition Corp I 566.22 0.49 -12.25 45
Alpha Partners Technology Merger Corp 456.30 - -6.39 -
SUBTOTAL 1,022.52 0.49 -18.63 45

Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Plum Acquisition Corp I versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.

Plum Acquisition I's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from Plum Acquisition I reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Ericsson Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Morgan Stanley Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
SmartNews Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
IBM Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Alpha Partners Technology Merger Corp Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Plum Acquisition I's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.

Plum Acquisition I's Productivity vs Peers Comparison

Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $
CompanyMarket CapRevenue / EmployeeIncome / Employee
Plum Acquisition Corp I 566 10,921 -272,159
Alpha Partners Technology Merger Corp 456 - -
PEERS TOTAL 456 - -

Plum Acquisition I's Position in Industry Market Structure

Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 145 companies in Plum Acquisition I's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.

Plum Acquisition I ranks #0 of 145 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 582, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).

Rank Company Market Cap Industry Share
1 Automatic Data Processing Inc 122,341 17.93 %
2 Infosys Limited 51,501 7.55 %
3 Workday Inc 47,513 6.96 %
4 Zscaler Inc 31,669 4.64 %
5 Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation 1,234 5.2%
6 Verisign Inc 1,234 5.2%
7 Verisk Analytics Inc 1,234 5.2%
8 Samsara Inc 1,234 5.2%
9 Wipro Limited 1,234 5.2%
10 Toast Inc 1,234 5.2%
0 Plum Acquisition Corp I 550 0.00 %
Full Industry Market Structure

Market cap and industry share for the rest of Plum Acquisition I's industry peers requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2024-09-13.

Plum Acquisition I's Profitability & Cost Structure

Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Cloud Computing & Data Analytics industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (257 companies). See the full Cloud Computing & Data Analytics industry profitability benchmarks.
Metric Company Industry Difference
Gross Margin 74.30 % 38.97 % (avg) +35.3 pp
Operating Margin - industry median -
EBITDA Margin 98.21 % 1.68 % (avg) +96.5 pp
Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) 40.65 % 5.88 % (avg) +34.8 pp

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.

Plum Acquisition I's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory

Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.
Metric 20212022202320242025
Revenue Growth --8.83 %0.26 %-92.74 %-66.00 %
Operating Margin 29.64 %-45.41 %---
Return on Invested Capital ---13.61 %-841.21 %-
P/E -----

Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.

Plum Acquisition I's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)

Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.
Force Assessment Basis
Competitive Rivalry High Industry HHI of 582 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above)
Barriers to Entry High (capital intensive) Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 40.65 % vs industry average 5.88 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above)

Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Plum Acquisition I's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.

Plum Acquisition I's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength

See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.

High Strength
Medium Strength
Low Strength
High Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Invest / Grow
Selective
Medium Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Selective
Harvest
Low Attractiveness
Selective Plum Acquisition I
Harvest
Harvest / Divest

Plum Acquisition I falls in the Low attractiveness / High strength cell: Selective.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.

Plum Acquisition I's SWOT

Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.

Strengths

  • Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+43.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months).

Weaknesses

No rule matched.

Opportunities

  • A meaningful share of competitors (100.00 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.

Threats

  • High capital intensity requires continuous reinvestment just to keep pace with the industry.

Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.

Plum Acquisition I's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison

Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months
CompanyQuick RatioWorking CapitalDebt / EquityAsset Turnover
Plum Acquisition Corp I 0.01 0.76 - 0.02
Alpha Partners Technology Merger Corp 0.02 0.03 - -

Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Plum Acquisition I's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers

Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodRevenue Y/YRevenue Q/QIncome Y/YIncome Q/Q
Plum Acquisition Corp IQ2 2026+141.6 %-2.3 %--
Alpha Partners Technology Merger CorpQ1 2026----
PEERS TOTAL+141.6 %-2.3 %--

Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Plum Acquisition I's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures

Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodCosts Y/YCosts Q/QCapex Y/YCapex Q/Q
Plum Acquisition Corp IQ2 2026+746.7 %+71.3 %+250.0 %+521.1 %
Alpha Partners Technology Merger CorpQ1 2026----

Plum Acquisition I's Returns and Turnover vs Peers

ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover
CompanyROAROIROEReceivables TurnoverInventory Turnover
Plum Acquisition Corp I---2.140.01
Alpha Partners Technology Merger Corp-----

ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).

Plum Acquisition I's Valuation vs Peers

P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book
CompanyP/EPrice / SalesPEGP/CFPrice / Book
Plum Acquisition Corp I-1,152.11-332.3070.33
Alpha Partners Technology Merger Corp29.03----
PEERS AVERAGE-2,080.56634.74-

P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.

Get the full CSIMarket dataset: Subscribe API Connect Your AI