Phx Minerals Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Phx Minerals Inc (PHX) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Phx Minerals Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 34M vs 1,765,647M combined for its competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-11.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-32.9%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Phx Minerals Inc generated -3.5% revenue growth year over year in Q1 2025, vs -13.4% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 57.7% net margin compares with 11.5% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Phx Minerals Inc accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $1.91M compares with $5.37M for the peer group (0.4x).
- Structure: Phx Minerals Inc operates in the following segments: Working Interest.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
PHX Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2025
Phx Minerals Inc reported revenue contraction of 3.45 % year on year in Q1 2025, above its competitors' combined revenue change of -13.42 %.
With a net margin of 57.70 %, Phx Minerals Inc achieved higher profitability than its competitors (11.48 %).
Phx Minerals Inc generated 0.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.00 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Phx Minerals Inc vs. its Competitors, Q1 2025
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Phx Minerals Inc reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Phx Minerals Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Phx Minerals Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (5) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Phx Minerals Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Oil And Gas Production industry grew revenue 3.2% year over year, combined, vs -3.5% for Phx Minerals Inc. Phx Minerals Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Phx Minerals Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phx Minerals Inc | Yes | No | No | No |
| Competitors combined (98) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
PHX Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
PHX Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sharkninja Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Gran Tierra Energy Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Calumet Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Apa Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Laredo Oil Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Phx Minerals Inc's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Publicly Traded Peers of Phx Minerals Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Phx Minerals Inc |
165.34 | 34.30 |
 Exxon Mobil Corporation |
686,784.60 | 396,627.00 |
 Chevron Corp |
420,022.00 | 215,261.00 |
 Shell Plc |
294,723.39 | 266,886.00 |
 Totalenergies Se |
193,782.34 | 162,863.00 |
 Conocophillips |
165,466.53 | 63,345.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 2,709,958.67 | 1,798,468.62 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Phx Minerals Inc .
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Phx Minerals Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Phx Minerals Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Phx Minerals Inc reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Callon Petroleum Co | Company report | 85% |
| Range Resources Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Dorchester Minerals L p | Company report | 85% |
| Sitio Royalties Corp | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Phx Minerals Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Phx Minerals Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Phx Minerals Inc | Working Interest 15.07 % |
| Chevron Corp | Reportable Segment, Aggregation before Other Operating 99.73 % |
| Williams companies inc | Transmission, Power & Gulf 47.62 % |
| Eog Resources Inc | United States of America 98.40 % |
| Imperial Oil Limited | Upstream 43.74 % |
| Occidental Petroleum Corporation | Oil and gas 95.12 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Phx Minerals Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phx Minerals Inc | 165 | 1,905,553 | 382,742 |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 686,785 | 6,838,397 | 707,224 |
| Chevron Corp | 420,022 | 5,001,533 | 487,116 |
| Shell Plc | 294,723 | 3,139,835 | 213,165 |
| Totalenergies Se | 193,782 | 17,683,279 | 1,450,271 |
| Conocophillips | 165,467 | 6,398,485 | 936,263 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 2,709,793 | 5,374,573 | 496,913 |
Phx Minerals Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Occidental Petroleum Corporation | Non-US 20.75 % |
| Sharkninja Inc | North America 66.47 % |
| Sm Energy Co | Permian Basin 50.83 % |
| Granite Ridge Resources Inc | Permian 67.87 % |
| Us Energy Corp | Rockies 84.98 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Phx Minerals Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 112 companies in Phx Minerals Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Phx Minerals Inc ranks #0 of 112 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 785, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shell Plc | 296,482 | 18.50 % |
| 2 | Totalenergies Se | 210,708 | 13.15 % |
| 3 | Petrobras Petroleo Brasileiro Sa | 139,244 | 8.69 % |
| 4 | Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 107,878 | 6.73 % |
| 5 | Eni Spa | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Eog Resources Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Slb Limited | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Diamondback Energy Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Cenovus Energy Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Phx Minerals Inc | 165 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Phx Minerals Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2025-06-20.
Phx Minerals Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Oil And Gas Production industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (245 companies). See the full Oil And Gas Production industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 0.00 % | 26.12 % (avg) | -26.1 pp |
| Operating Margin | 33.00 % | industry median | +22.5 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 58.45 % | 18.45 % (avg) | +40.0 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.25 % | 27.30 % (avg) | -27.1 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Phx Minerals Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Oil And Gas Production industry average (245 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Oil And Gas Production industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 20.6x | 16.3x | +4.3x |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.7x | 9.5x | -0.7x |
| P/B | 1.2x | 2.0x | -0.7x |
| Return on Equity | 5.57 % | industry aggregate | -5.54 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 4.00 % | 0.92 % (avg) | 3.08 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Phx Minerals Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 49.45 % | 13.68 % | -14.59 % | -51.11 % | 33.00 % | 68.72 % | -19.40 % | -22.25 % |
| Operating Margin | 19.42 % | -104.42 % | -106.16 % | -115.87 % | 30.22 % | - | 50.13 % | 34.75 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 3.16 % | -18.62 % | -19.64 % | -18.50 % | 5.57 % | - | 8.00 % | 4.23 % |
| P/E | 18.6x | 20.4x | - | - | 494.1x | 7.8x | 9.1x | 58.3x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Phx Minerals Inc's Strategic Group Map
Phx Minerals Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC are labeled. See Methodology: Strategic Group Map for how this chart is built.
Phx Minerals Inc's trailing-12-month revenue growth of -5.7% and operating margin of 33.0% compares with an average of -2.1% growth and 29.4% margin across its 8 closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC -- Phx Minerals Inc sits below that peer average on growth and above it on margin.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Phx Minerals Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 785 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.25 % vs industry average 27.30 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Phx Minerals Inc's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Phx Minerals Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
Phx Minerals Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / High strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Phx Minerals Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 22.5 points above the industry median.
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 5.5 points below the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-11.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-32.9% annualized).
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Phx Minerals Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phx Minerals Inc | 0.71 | 2.71 | 0.21 |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 0.12 | 1.13 | 0.16 |
| Chevron Corp | 0.01 | 1.16 | 0.21 |
| Shell Plc | 0.37 | 1.30 | 0.05 |
| Totalenergies Se | 0.28 | 0.97 | 0.02 |
| Conocophillips | 0.49 | 1.36 | 0.45 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Phx Minerals Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phx Minerals Inc | Q1 2025 | -3.4 % | - |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | Q3 2026 | +32.7 % | +98.4 % |
| Chevron Corp | Q2 2026 | +56.3 % | +385.6 % |
| Shell Plc | Q4 2025 | -6.1 % | +9.7 % |
| Totalenergies Se | Q4 2025 | -7.1 % | -16.7 % |
| Conocophillips | Q2 2026 | +36.8 % | +98.8 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +4.8 % | +43.0 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Phx Minerals Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phx Minerals Inc | Q1 2025 | - | -14.8 % |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | Q3 2026 | - | -17.7 % |
| Chevron Corp | Q2 2026 | +36.3 % | +22.3 % |
| Shell Plc | Q4 2025 | - | - |
| Totalenergies Se | Q4 2025 | - | - |
| Conocophillips | Q2 2026 | +32.0 % | - |
Phx Minerals Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phx Minerals Inc | 4.23% | 4.32% | 5.57% |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 8.87% | 9.71% | 15.39% |
| Chevron Corp | 6.40% | 6.49% | 10.85% |
| Shell Plc | 4.89% | 4.22% | 10.33% |
| Totalenergies Se | 4.59% | 11.37% | 11.37% |
| Conocophillips | 7.55% | 8.36% | 14.30% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Phx Minerals Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Phx Minerals Inc | 22.54 | 4.82 |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 17.12 | 1.73 |
| Chevron Corp | 20.27 | 1.95 |
| Shell Plc | 16.52 | 1.10 |
| Totalenergies Se | 17.15 | 1.19 |
| Conocophillips | 18.07 | 2.61 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 16.30 | 1.51 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.