Otonomo Technologies Ltd's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Otonomo Technologies Ltd (OTMO) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Otonomo Technologies Ltd vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 7M vs 71M combined for its competitors (8.9% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-87.6%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Otonomo Technologies Ltd generated 305.8% revenue growth year over year in Q4 2022, vs 12.2% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -1,874.6% net margin compares with 721.9% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Otonomo Technologies Ltd accounted for 75.9% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 46.6% a year earlier.
- Structure: Otonomo Technologies Ltd operates in the following segments: Insurance Related Services, Connected Vehicles.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
OTMO Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2022
Otonomo Technologies Ltd reported revenue growth of 305.80 % year on year in Q4 2022, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 12.19 %.
With a net margin of -1,874.60 %, Otonomo Technologies Ltd reported lower profitability than its competitors (721.92 %).
Otonomo Technologies Ltd generated 75.92 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 46.57 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Otonomo Technologies Ltd vs. its Competitors, Q4 2022
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Otonomo Technologies Ltd reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Otonomo Technologies Ltd and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Otonomo Technologies Ltd | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Otonomo Technologies Ltd's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Software & Programming industry grew revenue 16.7% year over year, combined, vs 305.8% for Otonomo Technologies Ltd. Otonomo Technologies Ltd's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Otonomo Technologies Ltd's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Otonomo Technologies Ltd | - | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Competitors combined (2) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
OTMO Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Red Cat Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Otonomo Technologies Ltd's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Publicly Traded Peers of Otonomo Technologies Ltd
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Otonomo Technologies Ltd |
488.88 | 6.99 |
 Red Cat Holdings Inc |
576.30 | 71.03 |
 Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd |
56.42 | 0.40 |
| SUBTOTAL | 1,121.60 | 78.42 |
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Otonomo Technologies Ltd versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Otonomo Technologies Ltd's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Otonomo Technologies Ltd reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Red Cat Holdings Inc | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Otonomo Technologies Ltd's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Otonomo Technologies Ltd's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Otonomo Technologies Ltd | Insurance Related Services 55.98 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Otonomo Technologies Ltd's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Otonomo Technologies Ltd | 489 | - | - |
| Red Cat Holdings Inc | 576 | 291,090 | -399,527 |
| Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd | 56 | 5,378 | 163,554 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 633 | 224,603 | -268,496 |
Otonomo Technologies Ltd's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Otonomo Technologies Ltd | EMEA 50.36 % |
| Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd | IL 40.70 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Otonomo Technologies Ltd's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Software & Programming industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (442 companies). See the full Software & Programming industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 51.84 % | 50.78 % (avg) | +1.1 pp |
| Operating Margin | - | industry median | - |
| EBITDA Margin | - | 1.89 % (avg) | - |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 3.45 % | 5.21 % (avg) | -1.8 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Otonomo Technologies Ltd's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Software & Programming industry average (442 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Software & Programming industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 41.6x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 20.5x | - |
| P/B | 0.4x | 5.6x | -5.2x |
| Return on Equity | -98.23 % | industry aggregate | -112.67 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -49.55 % | -3.24 % (avg) | -46.31 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Otonomo Technologies Ltd's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 3.45 % vs industry average 5.21 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Otonomo Technologies Ltd's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Otonomo Technologies Ltd's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 112.7 points below the industry aggregate.
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 11.2% median pace.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-87.6% annualized).
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Otonomo Technologies Ltd's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Otonomo Technologies Ltd | 1.72 | 11.08 | - |
| Red Cat Holdings Inc | 9.63 | 12.85 | 0.00 |
| Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd | 3.01 | 3.30 | - |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Otonomo Technologies Ltd's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Otonomo Technologies Ltd | Q4 2022 | +305.8 % | - |
| Red Cat Holdings Inc | Q2 2026 | +527.3 % | - |
| Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd | Q4 2025 | -8.7 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +412.9 % | - |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Otonomo Technologies Ltd's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Otonomo Technologies Ltd | Q4 2022 | +253.3 % | +28.2 % |
| Red Cat Holdings Inc | Q2 2026 | +495.4 % | +1,783.7 % |
| Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd | Q4 2025 | -18.6 % | -59.7 % |
Otonomo Technologies Ltd's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Otonomo Technologies Ltd | - | - | - |
| Red Cat Holdings Inc | - | - | - |
| Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd | 144.89% | 192.60% | 194.18% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Otonomo Technologies Ltd's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Otonomo Technologies Ltd | - | 69.92 |
| Red Cat Holdings Inc | - | 8.11 |
| Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd | - | 141.76 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | - | 14.30 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.