Onfolio Holdings Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Onfolio Holdings Inc (ONFO) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Onfolio Holdings Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 8M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-26.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Scale: Onfolio Holdings Inc ranks #119 of 165 companies by market capitalization in the Cloud Computing & Data Analytics industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Onfolio Holdings Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
ONFO Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Onfolio Holdings Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Cloud Computing & Data Analytics industry grew revenue 1.3% year over year, combined, vs -52.4% for Onfolio Holdings Inc. Onfolio Holdings Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Onfolio Holdings Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Onfolio Holdings Inc | No | No | No | Yes |
| Similar-Size Competitors (7) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
ONFO Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
ONFO Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
ONFO Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
ONFO Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
Onfolio Holdings Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Onfolio Holdings Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Digital Silk | Named by the company | 85% |
| Fat Joe | Named by the company | 85% |
| OHO Interactive | Named by the company | 85% |
| SaaSpirin | Named by the company | 85% |
| Tiny | Named by the company | 85% |
| Brand Featured | Named by the company | 85% |
| DrMercola | Named by the company | 85% |
| iFactory | Named by the company | 85% |
| Quicksilver Scientific | Named by the company | 85% |
| The Dental SEO Company | Named by the company | 85% |
| AppSumo | Named by the company | 85% |
| Digital Wave | Named by the company | 85% |
| FontBundles | Named by the company | 85% |
| Outreach Monks | Named by the company | 85% |
| SimpleTiger | Named by the company | 85% |
| WeCommerce Holdings | Named by the company | 85% |
| CreativeMarket | Named by the company | 85% |
| Emerge Commerce | Named by the company | 85% |
| InterActiveCorp | Named by the company | 85% |
| Red Ventures | Named by the company | 85% |
| Thrasio | Named by the company | 85% |
| Best Results Dental Marketing | Named by the company | 85% |
| DrinkHRW | Named by the company | 85% |
| FuturePLC | Named by the company | 85% |
| PatientGain | Named by the company | 85% |
| Skale | Named by the company | 85% |
| Writing Studio | Named by the company | 85% |
| Line Corp | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Onfolio Holdings Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Onfolio Holdings Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Onfolio Holdings Inc | B Two B 81.36 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).