Old National Bancorp's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Old National Bancorp (ONB) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Old National Bancorp vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 2,537M vs 1,158,565M combined for tracked competitors (0.2% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+4.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs holding steady (-1.5%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Old National Bancorp generated 46.7% revenue growth year over year in Q1 2026, vs 5.9% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 35.4% net margin compares with 9.1% for the peer group.
- Scale: Old National Bancorp ranks #17 of 83 companies by market capitalization in the Commercial Banks industry, holding 0.4% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Old National Bancorp accounted for 0.2% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.2% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.51M compares with $1.14M for the peer group (0.4x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
ONB Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2026
Old National Bancorp reported revenue growth of 46.65 % year on year in Q1 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 5.86 %.
With a net margin of 35.41 %, Old National Bancorp achieved higher profitability than its competitors (9.10 %).
Old National Bancorp generated 0.23 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.17 % a year earlier.
Old National Bancorp vs. its Competitors, Q1 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Old National Bancorp and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Old National Bancorp | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Old National Bancorp's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Commercial Banks industry grew revenue 44.1% year over year, combined, vs 46.7% for Old National Bancorp. Old National Bancorp's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.24% to 0.24%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Old National Bancorp's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Old National Bancorp | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (43) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
ONB Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
ONB Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
ONB Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United Fire Group Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Financial Institutions Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Principal Financial Group inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Cno Financial Group Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | S and t Bancorp Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Old National Bancorp's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Old National Bancorp's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Old National Bancorp
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Old National Bancorp | 9,782.84 | 2,536.62 |
| The Cigna Group | 71,752.79 | 282,382.00 |
| Metlife Inc | 61,985.96 | 79,403.00 |
| Allstate Corp | 58,958.21 | 70,137.00 |
| Arthur J Gallagher and Co | 58,902.38 | 27,382.50 |
| Truist Financial Corporation | 58,346.39 | 19,028.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 785,783.31 | 1,172,919.46 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Old National Bancorp.
Sources: Old National Bancorp's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Old National Bancorp versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Old National Bancorp's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Bradesco | Named by the company | 85% |
| Financial Institutions Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Two | Named by the company | 85% |
| Prudential Plc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Old National Bancorp's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Old National Bancorp's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| The Cigna Group | Evernorth 85.32 % |
| Metlife Inc | Group Benefits 36.13 % |
| Allstate Corp | Allstate Protection 87.37 % |
| Arthur J Gallagher and Co | Brokerage 45.31 % |
| Aon Plc | Risk Capital 70.80 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Old National Bancorp.
Old National Bancorp's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Old National Bancorp | 9,783 | 510,284 | 152,539 |
| The Cigna Group | 71,753 | 4,171,078 | 103,146 |
| Metlife Inc | 61,986 | 1,726,152 | 79,543 |
| Allstate Corp | 58,958 | 1,308,526 | 248,134 |
| Arthur J Gallagher and Co | 58,902 | 380,313 | 21,874 |
| Truist Financial Corporation | 58,346 | 513,078 | 157,472 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 776,000 | 1,137,571 | 161,554 |
Sign in to see all peers for Old National Bancorp.
Old National Bancorp's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Arthur J Gallagher and Co | Other Foreign 4.06 % |
| Aon Plc | Europe, Middle East, and Africa, Other Than United Kingdom and Ireland 16.91 % |
| Brown and Brown Inc | US 86.46 % |
| Citizens Inc | All Countries 66.88 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Old National Bancorp's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 81 companies in Old National Bancorp's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Old National Bancorp ranks #17 of 81 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.40 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,895, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 916,675 | 36.90 % |
| 2 | Bank Of America Corporation | 412,086 | 16.59 % |
| 3 | Wells Fargo and Company | 252,701 | 10.17 % |
| 4 | Citigroup inc | 236,874 | 9.53 % |
| 5 | Capital one financial corp | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Us Bancorp De | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Pnc Financial Services Group Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Truist Financial Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Huntington Bancshares Incorporated | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Mizuho Financial Group Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 17 | Old National Bancorp | 9,849 | 0.40 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Old National Bancorp's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Old National Bancorp's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | Shinhan Financial Group Co Ltd | 22,251 | 67.75 % |
| 13 | Keycorp | 22,090 | 8.74 % |
| 14 | Pinnacle Financial Partners Inc | 14,305 | -0.81 % |
| 15 | First Horizon Corp | 11,201 | 2.96 % |
| 16 | Umb Financial Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 17 | Old National Bancorp | 9,849 | 16.10 % |
| 18 | Cullen | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 19 | Zions Bancorporation National Association | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 20 | Bok Financial Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 21 | Valley National Bancorp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 22 | Wilson Bank Holding Co | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Old National Bancorp's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Old National Bancorp's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Commercial Banks industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (46 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 89.71 % | 65.76 % (avg) | +24.0 pp |
| Operating Margin | 37.65 % | industry median | -0.1 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 69.56 % | 50.98 % (avg) | +18.6 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 2.02 % | 1.97 % (avg) | +0.0 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Old National Bancorp's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Commercial Banks industry average (46 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 11.9x | 15.4x | -3.4x |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.8x | 6.3x | -0.5x |
| P/B | 1.1x | 1.3x | -0.2x |
| Return on Equity | 9.07 % | industry aggregate | -1.98 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 4.04 % | 3.36 % (avg) | 0.68 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Old National Bancorp's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 17.56 % | 10.04 % | -0.23 % | 5.33 % | 88.57 % | 12.30 % | -0.15 % | 31.09 % |
| Operating Margin | 28.75 % | 36.35 % | 32.07 % | 40.37 % | 34.41 % | 42.26 % | 38.34 % | 36.16 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 3.19 % | 3.72 % | 3.12 % | 4.10 % | 1.65 % | 1.39 % | 1.16 % | 3.81 % |
| P/E | 13.9x | 13.2x | 12.1x | 11.0x | 15.4x | 8.2x | 13.2x | 12.4x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Old National Bancorp's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Old National Bancorp's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Old National Bancorp is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Old National Bancorp's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Old National Bancorp's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Old National Bancorp falls in the Question Mark quadrant: relative market share of 0.01x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 13.0% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Jpmorgan Chase and Co alone holds 37% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
Old National Bancorp's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Moderate | Industry HHI of 1,895 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Moderate, in line with the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 2.02 % vs industry average 1.97 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Old National Bancorp's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Old National Bancorp's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Old National Bancorp's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Old National Bancorp falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Old National Bancorp's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+4.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.01x).
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 13.0% median pace.
- Trades at a lower P/E than the industry average (11.9x vs 15.4x) despite a higher return on invested capital -- a possible re-rating opportunity.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Jpmorgan Chase and Co, holding 36.90 % of industry market cap.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Old National Bancorp's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Old National Bancorp | - | 0.04 | 0.15 |
| The Cigna Group | 0.12 | 0.82 | 0.76 |
| Metlife Inc | 0.08 | 0.29 | 0.70 |
| Allstate Corp | 0.02 | 0.15 | 0.25 |
| Arthur J Gallagher and Co | - | 1.14 | 0.56 |
| Truist Financial Corporation | 0.09 | 0.16 | 1.08 |
Sign in to see all peers for Old National Bancorp.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Old National Bancorp's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Old National Bancorp | Q1 2026 | +46.6 % | +61.5 % |
| The Cigna Group | Q2 2026 | +6.7 % | +22.4 % |
| Metlife Inc | Q2 2026 | +10.5 % | +6.0 % |
| Allstate Corp | Q2 2026 | +11.8 % | +55.8 % |
| Arthur J Gallagher and Co | Q2 2026 | -37.4 % | -11.5 % |
| Truist Financial Corporation | Q2 2026 | +8.2 % | +25.2 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +7.4 % | +63.7 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Old National Bancorp.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Old National Bancorp's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Old National Bancorp | Q1 2026 | +11.3 % | +122.1 % |
| The Cigna Group | Q2 2026 | +6.4 % | - |
| Metlife Inc | Q2 2026 | +1,959.3 % | - |
| Allstate Corp | Q2 2026 | +6.1 % | - |
| Arthur J Gallagher and Co | Q2 2026 | - | +29.4 % |
| Truist Financial Corporation | Q2 2026 | -24.2 % | - |
Sign in to see all peers for Old National Bancorp.
Old National Bancorp's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Old National Bancorp | 1.06% | 4.97% | 9.07% |
| The Cigna Group | 4.46% | 6.88% | 16.50% |
| Metlife Inc | 0.49% | 0.77% | 12.93% |
| Allstate Corp | 10.88% | 16.50% | 43.12% |
| Arthur J Gallagher and Co | 2.03% | 4.08% | 6.69% |
| Truist Financial Corporation | 1.06% | 2.65% | 9.01% |
Sign in to see all peers for Old National Bancorp.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Old National Bancorp's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Old National Bancorp | 12.86 | 3.86 |
| The Cigna Group | 11.27 | 0.25 |
| Metlife Inc | 18.39 | 0.78 |
| Allstate Corp | 4.56 | 0.84 |
| Arthur J Gallagher and Co | 37.99 | 2.15 |
| Truist Financial Corporation | 10.83 | 3.07 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 4.71 | 0.67 |
Sign in to see all peers for Old National Bancorp.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.