Omnia Wellness Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Omnia Wellness Inc (OMWS) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Omnia Wellness Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 0M vs 9,296M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-67.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-14.1%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Omnia Wellness Inc generated -50.8% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2022, vs 27.7% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -2,231.0% net margin compares with -12.3% for the peer group.
- Scale: Omnia Wellness Inc ranks #218 of 247 companies by market capitalization in the Medical Equipment & Supplies industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Omnia Wellness Inc accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
OMWS Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2022
Omnia Wellness Inc reported revenue contraction of 50.79 % year on year in Q2 2022, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 27.70 %.
With a net margin of -2,230.95 %, Omnia Wellness Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (-12.29 %).
Omnia Wellness Inc generated 0.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.00 % a year earlier.
Omnia Wellness Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2022
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Omnia Wellness Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Omnia Wellness Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Omnia Wellness Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Medical Equipment & Supplies industry grew revenue 15.1% year over year, combined, vs -50.8% for Omnia Wellness Inc. Omnia Wellness Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Omnia Wellness Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omnia Wellness Inc | No | - | - | Yes |
| Competitors combined (4) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
OMWS Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
OMWS Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Life Time Group Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | The Howard Hughes Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Peloton Interactive Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Planet Fitness inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Omnia Wellness Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Publicly Traded Peers of Omnia Wellness Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Omnia Wellness Inc | 0.05 | 0.35 |
| Life Time Group Holdings Inc | 9,048.01 | 3,182.44 |
| Peloton Interactive Inc | 2,209.45 | 2,445.10 |
| Planet Fitness inc | - | 1,409.06 |
| The Howard Hughes Corporation | - | 2,259.79 |
| SUBTOTAL | 11,257.51 | 9,296.74 |
Sources: Omnia Wellness Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Omnia Wellness Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Omnia Wellness Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Peloton Interactive Inc | Subscription 67.90 % |
| Planet Fitness inc | Corporate Owned Club 41.70 % |
| The Howard Hughes Corporation | Operating Assets 50.53 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Omnia Wellness Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Omnia Wellness Inc | 0 | - | - |
| Life Time Group Holdings Inc | 9,048 | 72,328 | 9,429 |
| Peloton Interactive Inc | 2,209 | 1,461,506 | 37,717 |
| Planet Fitness inc | - | 320,752 | 54,425 |
| The Howard Hughes Corporation | - | 2,054,352 | 295,714 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 11,257 | 181,691 | 20,372 |
Omnia Wellness Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Peloton Interactive Inc | North America 90.78 % |
| Planet Fitness inc | Americas 97.07 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Omnia Wellness Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 222 companies in Omnia Wellness Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Omnia Wellness Inc ranks #218 of 222 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 585, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intuitive Surgical Inc | 145,978 | 13.46 % |
| 2 | Medtronic Plc | 110,377 | 10.18 % |
| 3 | Stryker Corp | 106,671 | 9.84 % |
| 4 | 3m Company | 85,344 | 7.87 % |
| 5 | Boston Scientific Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Edwards Lifesciences Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Becton Dickinson And Company | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Dexcom Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Resmed Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Alcon inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 218 | Omnia Wellness Inc | 0 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Omnia Wellness Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-30.
Omnia Wellness Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 213 | Vicarious Surgical Inc | 0 | -99.06 % |
| 214 | Valion Bio Inc | 0 | -8.27 % |
| 215 | Encision Inc | 0 | - |
| 216 | Ir med Inc | 0 | - |
| 217 | Nuwellis Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 218 | Omnia Wellness Inc | 0 | - |
| 219 | Strata Skin Sciences Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 220 | Better Therapeutics Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 221 | Tenon Medical Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 222 | Bionik Laboratories Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Omnia Wellness Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-10-01. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Omnia Wellness Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Medical Equipment & Supplies industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (288 companies). See the full Medical Equipment & Supplies industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 55.89 % | 53.37 % (avg) | +2.5 pp |
| Operating Margin | -762.71 % | industry median | -723.1 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -1,224.00 % | -6.86 % (avg) | -1,217.1 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | - | 5.50 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Omnia Wellness Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Medical Equipment & Supplies industry average (288 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Medical Equipment & Supplies industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 34.6x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 19.6x | - |
| P/B | -0.1x | 4.7x | -4.8x |
| Return on Equity | 89.82 % | industry aggregate | 83.36 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 32.03 % | -2.43 % (avg) | 34.46 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Omnia Wellness Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | - | - |
| Operating Margin | - | - | -956.82 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 91.29 % | 45.90 % | 62.97 % |
| P/E | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Omnia Wellness Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Omnia Wellness Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Omnia Wellness Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 9.2% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Omnia Wellness Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 585 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Omnia Wellness Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Omnia Wellness Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Omnia Wellness Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Omnia Wellness Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Omnia Wellness Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Return on equity 83.4 points above the industry aggregate.
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 723.1 points below the industry median.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-67.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-14.1% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Omnia Wellness Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Omnia Wellness Inc | 0.00 | 0.04 | - |
| Life Time Group Holdings Inc | 0.31 | 0.62 | 0.48 |
| Peloton Interactive Inc | 1.66 | 2.18 | - |
| Planet Fitness inc | 1.01 | 1.94 | - |
| The Howard Hughes Corporation | 0.65 | 1.10 | 1.89 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Omnia Wellness Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Omnia Wellness Inc | Q3 2022 | -50.8 % | - |
| Life Time Group Holdings Inc | Q2 2026 | +13.7 % | +40.6 % |
| Peloton Interactive Inc | Q2 2026 | +0.1 % | +183.9 % |
| Planet Fitness inc | Q2 2026 | +7.1 % | +15.6 % |
| The Howard Hughes Corporation | Q2 2026 | +286.8 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +44.6 % | +199.9 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Omnia Wellness Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Omnia Wellness Inc | Q3 2022 | +814.6 % | - |
| Life Time Group Holdings Inc | Q2 2026 | +12.3 % | +18.6 % |
| Peloton Interactive Inc | Q2 2026 | -5.6 % | -51.1 % |
| Planet Fitness inc | Q2 2026 | +8.5 % | +17.3 % |
| The Howard Hughes Corporation | Q2 2026 | - | -34.4 % |
Omnia Wellness Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Omnia Wellness Inc | - | - | - |
| Life Time Group Holdings Inc | 5.14% | 4.09% | 13.14% |
| Peloton Interactive Inc | 3.02% | 3.55% | - |
| Planet Fitness inc | 7.79% | 11.11% | - |
| The Howard Hughes Corporation | 3.30% | 3.67% | 11.34% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Omnia Wellness Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Omnia Wellness Inc | - | 0.13 |
| Life Time Group Holdings Inc | 21.63 | 2.84 |
| Peloton Interactive Inc | 38.96 | 0.90 |
| Planet Fitness inc | 15.21 | - |
| The Howard Hughes Corporation | 16.06 | - |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 10.85 | 1.21 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.