Oceaneering International Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Oceaneering International Inc (OII) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Oceaneering International Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 2,872M vs 85,446M combined for tracked competitors (3.3% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+7.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs holding steady (+1.1%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Oceaneering International Inc generated 10.0% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 4.3% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 8.3% net margin compares with 8.9% for the peer group.
- Scale: Oceaneering International Inc ranks #34 of 134 companies by market capitalization in the Oil And Gas Production industry, holding 0.3% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Oceaneering International Inc accounted for 3.4% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 3.3% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.26M compares with $0.49M for the peer group (0.5x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
OII Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Oceaneering International Inc reported revenue growth of 10.03 % year on year in Q2 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 4.33 %.
With a net margin of 8.28 %, Oceaneering International Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (8.92 %).
Oceaneering International Inc generated 3.43 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 3.26 % a year earlier.
Oceaneering International Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Oceaneering International Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Oceaneering International Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (5) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Oceaneering International Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Oil And Gas Production industry grew revenue 3.3% year over year, combined, vs 10.0% for Oceaneering International Inc. Oceaneering International Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.05% to 0.05%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Oceaneering International Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oceaneering International Inc | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (16) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
OII Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
OII Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
OII Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
OII Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Patterson uti Energy Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Technipfmc Plc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Ecopetrol S a | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Transocean ltd | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Helix Energy Solutions Group inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Oceaneering International Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Oceaneering International Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
We are one of several companies that provide underwater services and specialty
subsea hardware on a worldwide basis. We compete for contracts with companies
that have worldwide operations, as well as numerous others operating locally
in various areas. We believe that our ability to provide a wide range of underwater
services and products on a worldwide basis enables us to compete effectively
in all phases of the offshore oilfield life cycle. In some cases involving projects
that require less sophisticated equipment, small companies have been able to
bid for contracts at prices uneconomical to us. Additionally, in some jurisdictions
we are subject to foreign governmental regulations favoring or requiring the
awarding of contracts to local contractors or requiring foreign contractors
to employ citizens of, or purchase supplies from, a particular jurisdiction.
These regulations may adversely affect our ability to compete.
ROVs. We believe we are the worlds largest owner/operator of work-class ROVs
employed in oil and gas related operations.
Competition for ROV services historically has been based on equipment availability,
location of or ability to deploy the equipment, quality of service and price.
The relative importance of these factors can vary over time based on market
conditions. The ability to develop improved equipment and techniques and to
train and retain skilled personnel is also an important competitive factor in
our markets. Demand for ROVs has been decreasing since mid 2014 due to the oil
price environment, and our margins have decreased in recent periods due to lower
utilization and pricing pressure, as price has become a more important factor
in the current oil price environment.
Subsea Products. There are many competitors offering specialized products. We
are one of several companies that compete on a worldwide basis for the provision
of thermoplastic and steel tube subsea control umbilicals, and compared to current
and forecasted market demand, we are faced with overcapacity in the umbilical
manufacturing market.
Subsea Projects. We perform subsea intervention and hardware installation services,
principally in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and offshore Angola and India, from multiservice
deepwater vessels. We are one of many companies that offer these services. In
general, our competitors can move their vessels to where we operate from other
locations with relative ease. We also have many competitors that supply commercial
diving services to the oil and gas industry in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Our
survey and positioning services are similarly competitive.
Asset Integrity. The worldwide asset integrity and inspection markets consist
of a wide range of inspection and certification requirements in many industries.
We compete in only selected portions of this market. We believe that our broad
geographic sales and operational coverage, long history of operations, technical
reputation, application of various pipeline inspection technologies and accreditation
to international quality standards enable us to compete effectively in our selected
asset integrity and inspection services market segments.
Advanced Technologies
Engineering services is a very broad market with a large number of competitors.
We compete in specialized areas in which we can combine our extensive program
management experience, mechanical engineering expertise and the capability to
continue the development of conceptual project designs into the manufacture
of custom equipment for customers.
Publicly Traded Peers of Oceaneering International Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Oceaneering International Inc | 4,617.33 | 2,872.09 |
| Slb Limited | 77,543.94 | 36,365.00 |
| Baker Hughes Company | 57,120.00 | 27,893.00 |
| Ecopetrol S a | 34,335.20 | 30,513.17 |
| Technipfmc Plc | 28,565.79 | 10,420.10 |
| Halliburton Company | 27,176.34 | 22,373.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 258,038.67 | 150,521.41 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Oceaneering International Inc.
Sources: Oceaneering International Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Oceaneering International Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Oceaneering International Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Oil States International Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Technipfmc Plc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Helix Energy Solutions Group inc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Oceaneering International Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Oceaneering International Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Oceaneering International Inc | Subsea Robotics 30.20 % |
| Slb Limited | Production Systems 42.03 % |
| Baker Hughes Company | Oilfield Services and Equipment 52.34 % |
| Technipfmc Plc | Subsea 88.59 % |
| Halliburton Company | Completion and Production 55.83 % |
| Valaris Limited | Jackups 45.17 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Oceaneering International Inc.
Oceaneering International Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oceaneering International Inc | 4,617 | 258,746 | 31,408 |
| Slb Limited | 77,544 | 333,624 | 28,899 |
| Baker Hughes Company | 57,120 | 498,089 | 56,304 |
| Ecopetrol S a | 34,335 | 1,271,382 | 153,423 |
| Technipfmc Plc | 28,566 | 410,127 | 46,345 |
| Halliburton Company | 27,176 | 466,104 | 33,479 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 253,421 | 488,981 | 39,213 |
Sign in to see all peers for Oceaneering International Inc.
Oceaneering International Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Oceaneering International Inc | UNITED STATES 39.32 % |
| Slb Limited | Middle East 28.67 % |
| Halliburton Company | North America 39.54 % |
| Transocean ltd | US 35.61 % |
| Rpc inc | US 98.51 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Oceaneering International Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 113 companies in Oceaneering International Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Oceaneering International Inc ranks #34 of 113 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.30 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 787, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shell Plc | 291,528 | 18.98 % |
| 2 | Totalenergies Se | 218,956 | 14.25 % |
| 3 | Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 105,431 | 6.86 % |
| 4 | Eni Spa | 96,790 | 6.30 % |
| 5 | Slb Limited | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Eog Resources Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Cenovus Energy Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Diamondback Energy Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Devon Energy Corp | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 34 | Oceaneering International Inc | 4,682 | 0.30 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Oceaneering International Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Oceaneering International Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29 | Landbridge Company Llc | 6,289 | 50.21 % |
| 30 | Murphy Oil Corporation | 5,375 | 26.17 % |
| 31 | Cnx Resources Corporation | 5,016 | 1.27 % |
| 32 | Hess Midstream Lp | 4,951 | 9.93 % |
| 33 | California Resources Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 34 | Oceaneering International Inc | 4,682 | 83.50 % |
| 35 | Magnolia Oil and Gas Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 36 | Crescent Energy Company | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 37 | Comstock Resources Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 38 | Par Pacific Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 39 | Aris Mining Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Oceaneering International Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Oceaneering International Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Oil And Gas Production industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (165 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 19.82 % | 57.30 % (avg) | -37.5 pp |
| Operating Margin | 10.37 % | industry median | -0.7 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 16.42 % | 11.81 % (avg) | +4.6 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 3.32 % | 24.95 % (avg) | -21.6 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Oceaneering International Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Oil And Gas Production industry average (165 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 13.9x | 15.8x | -1.9x |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.3x | 8.9x | +0.3x |
| P/B | 3.8x | 1.8x | +2.0x |
| Return on Equity | 32.64 % | industry aggregate | 20.65 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 10.10 % | 5.38 % (avg) | 4.72 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Oceaneering International Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -0.63 % | 7.26 % | -10.75 % | -5.63 % | 11.45 % | 17.36 % | 9.75 % | 4.62 % |
| Operating Margin | -7.62 % | -14.19 % | -24.40 % | 5.44 % | 5.37 % | 7.48 % | 9.25 % | 10.94 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -3.79 % | -7.97 % | -19.88 % | 4.81 % | 5.87 % | 9.09 % | 11.59 % | 11.98 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | 246.3x | 64.5x | 21.8x | 35.0x | 8.8x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Oceaneering International Inc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Oceaneering International Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Oceaneering International Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Oceaneering International Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Oceaneering International Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Oceaneering International Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.02x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 0.1% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Oceaneering International Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 787 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 3.32 % vs industry average 24.95 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Oceaneering International Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Oceaneering International Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Oceaneering International Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Oceaneering International Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Oceaneering International Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Return on equity 20.7 points above the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+7.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.02x).
Opportunities
- Trades at a lower P/E than the industry average (13.9x vs 15.8x) despite a higher return on invested capital -- a possible re-rating opportunity.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Oceaneering International Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oceaneering International Inc | 0.23 | 2.05 | 0.46 |
| Slb Limited | 0.20 | 1.37 | 0.38 |
| Baker Hughes Company | - | 1.58 | 0.46 |
| Ecopetrol S a | 0.11 | 0.54 | 0.95 |
| Technipfmc Plc | 0.19 | 1.12 | 0.13 |
| Halliburton Company | 0.36 | 2.02 | 0.68 |
Sign in to see all peers for Oceaneering International Inc.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Oceaneering International Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oceaneering International Inc | Q2 2026 | +10.0 % | +16.8 % |
| Slb Limited | Q2 2026 | +5.0 % | -22.2 % |
| Baker Hughes Company | Q1 2026 | +2.5 % | +129.3 % |
| Ecopetrol S a | Q4 2025 | -10.2 % | -21.9 % |
| Technipfmc Plc | Q2 2026 | +9.0 % | +35.0 % |
| Halliburton Company | Q2 2026 | +3.7 % | +11.3 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | -4.0 % | +12.0 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Oceaneering International Inc.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Oceaneering International Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oceaneering International Inc | Q2 2026 | +11.2 % | -23.4 % |
| Slb Limited | Q2 2026 | +79.3 % | +29.0 % |
| Baker Hughes Company | Q1 2026 | +3.1 % | +12.0 % |
| Ecopetrol S a | Q4 2025 | -5.1 % | +2.6 % |
| Technipfmc Plc | Q2 2026 | - | -28.1 % |
| Halliburton Company | Q2 2026 | - | -33.6 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Oceaneering International Inc.
Oceaneering International Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oceaneering International Inc | 13.23% | 18.49% | 32.64% |
| Slb Limited | 5.73% | 7.18% | 11.58% |
| Baker Hughes Company | 7.43% | 11.19% | 16.88% |
| Ecopetrol S a | 5.12% | 7.30% | 13.53% |
| Technipfmc Plc | 11.54% | 22.48% | 35.07% |
| Halliburton Company | 6.36% | 7.98% | 15.08% |
Sign in to see all peers for Oceaneering International Inc.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Oceaneering International Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Oceaneering International Inc | 15.81 | 1.61 |
| Slb Limited | 24.64 | 2.13 |
| Baker Hughes Company | 18.28 | 2.05 |
| Ecopetrol S a | 127.90 | 1.13 |
| Technipfmc Plc | 24.61 | 2.74 |
| Halliburton Company | 17.07 | 1.21 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 21.17 | 1.71 |
Sign in to see all peers for Oceaneering International Inc.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.