Omega Flex Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Omega Flex Inc (OFLX) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Omega Flex Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 97M vs 21,499M combined for tracked competitors (0.4% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is holding steady (-0.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+7.1%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Omega Flex Inc generated -5.4% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 9.8% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 10.9% net margin compares with 19.0% for the peer group.
- Scale: Omega Flex Inc ranks #4 of 6 companies by market capitalization in the Renewable Energy Services & Equipment industry, holding 1.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Omega Flex Inc accounted for 0.4% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 0.5% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.56M compares with $0.36M for the peer group (1.6x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
OFLX Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Omega Flex Inc reported revenue contraction of 5.37 % year on year in Q2 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 9.76 %.
With a net margin of 10.86 %, Omega Flex Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (18.97 %).
Omega Flex Inc generated 0.42 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 0.48 % a year earlier.
Omega Flex Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Omega Flex Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Omega Flex Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (3) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (3) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Omega Flex Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Renewable Energy Services & Equipment industry grew revenue 24.2% year over year, combined, vs -5.4% for Omega Flex Inc. Omega Flex Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.11% to 0.08%, a loss of 0.03 percentage points.
Omega Flex Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omega Flex Inc | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| Competitors combined (1) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (4) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) | 75.00 % (6 of 8) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) | 16.70 % (1 of 6) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
OFLX Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
OFLX Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
OFLX Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Parker hannifin Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Omega Flex Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Omega Flex Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Due to the number of applications in which flexible metal hose may be used, and the number of companies engaged in the manufacture and sale of flexible metal hose, the general industrial market is very fragmented, and we estimate that no one company has a predominant market share of the business over other competitors. In the market for double containment piping, we compete primarily against rigid pipe systems that are more costly to install than DoubleTrac® double containment piping. The general industrial markets within Europe are very mature and tend to offer opportunities, which are interesting to us in niche markets or during periods in which a weak dollar increases the demand for our products on a competitive basis. Such has been the case for several years and has created new relationships for us. Currently, we are not heavily engaged in the manufacture of flexible metal hose for the aerospace or automotive markets, but we continue to review opportunities in all markets for our products to determine appropriate applications that will provide growth potential and high margins. In some cases, where the product offering is considered a commodity, price is the overriding competing factor. In other cases, a proprietary product offering or superior performance will be the major factors with pricing being secondary and in some cases, a non-factor. The majority of our sales are to distributors and wholesalers, and our relationships with these customers are on an arms-length basis in that neither we, nor the customers are so dependent on the other to yield any significant business advantage. From our perspective, we are able to maintain a steady demand for our products due to the broad acceptance of our products by end users, regardless of which distributor or wholesaler sells the product.
Publicly Traded Peers of Omega Flex Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Omega Flex Inc | 260.53 | 96.65 |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | 124,893.66 | 21,499.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 125,154.18 | 21,595.65 |
Sources: Omega Flex Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Omega Flex Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Omega Flex Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Parker hannifin Corporation | Diversified Industrial 66.93 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Omega Flex Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Omega Flex Inc | 261 | 561,919 | 67,308 |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | 124,894 | 359,215 | 60,969 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 124,894 | 359,215 | 60,969 |
Omega Flex Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Parker hannifin Corporation | North America 67.21 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Omega Flex Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 5 companies in Omega Flex Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Omega Flex Inc ranks #4 of 5 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 1.01 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 4,654, indicating a highly concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Masco Corporation | 13,945 | 54.18 % |
| 2 | The Aes Corporation | 10,632 | 41.30 % |
| 3 | Babcock and Wilcox Enterprises Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 4 | Omega Flex Inc | 259 | 1.01 % |
| 5 | Fgi Industries Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Slr Investment Corp | 1,234 | 5.2% |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Omega Flex Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Omega Flex Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Masco Corporation | 13,945 | -2.88 % |
| 2 | The Aes Corporation | 10,632 | 14.08 % |
| 3 | Babcock and Wilcox Enterprises Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 4 | Omega Flex Inc | 259 | - |
| 5 | Fgi Industries Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Omega Flex Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Omega Flex Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Renewable Energy Services & Equipment industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (13 companies). See the full Renewable Energy Services & Equipment industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 57.75 % | 23.11 % (avg) | +34.6 pp |
| Operating Margin | 13.99 % | industry median | +11.9 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 18.76 % | -0.24 % (avg) | +19.0 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 1.77 % | 7.96 % (avg) | -6.2 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Omega Flex Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Renewable Energy Services & Equipment industry average (13 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Renewable Energy Services & Equipment industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 25.2x | 39.7x | -14.5x |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.9x | 11.8x | +2.1x |
| P/B | 3.6x | 3.6x | +0.0x |
| Return on Equity | 13.91 % | industry aggregate | 2.58 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 7.90 % | 5.31 % (avg) | 2.59 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Omega Flex Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 6.40 % | 2.81 % | -5.00 % | 22.89 % | -3.48 % | -15.04 % | -9.12 % | -3.22 % |
| Operating Margin | 24.34 % | 19.69 % | 25.19 % | 26.97 % | 24.72 % | 22.46 % | 21.30 % | 17.28 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 20.71 % | 17.27 % | 30.75 % | 30.54 % | 22.46 % | 16.19 % | 12.81 % | 9.81 % |
| P/E | 28.9x | 60.3x | 121.8x | 50.5x | 41.3x | 36.1x | 25.5x | 20.0x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Omega Flex Inc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Omega Flex Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Omega Flex Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Omega Flex Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Omega Flex Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Omega Flex Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.02x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 7.2% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Masco Corporation alone holds 54% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
Omega Flex Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Low | Industry HHI of 4,654 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 1.77 % vs industry average 7.96 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Omega Flex Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Omega Flex Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Omega Flex Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Omega Flex Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Omega Flex Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 11.9 points above the industry median.
Weaknesses
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.02x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
- Trades at a lower P/E than the industry average (25.2x vs 39.7x) despite a higher return on invested capital -- a possible re-rating opportunity.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Masco Corporation, holding 54.18 % of industry market cap.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Omega Flex Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Omega Flex Inc | 3.43 | 5.53 | - |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | 0.08 | 1.16 | 0.65 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Omega Flex Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Omega Flex Inc | Q2 2026 | -5.4 % | -36.3 % |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | Q2 2026 | +9.8 % | +18.2 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +9.7 % | +18.0 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Omega Flex Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Omega Flex Inc | Q2 2026 | +8.4 % | -60.4 % |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | Q2 2026 | +6.8 % | +32.2 % |
Omega Flex Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Omega Flex Inc | 11.27% | 13.16% | 13.91% |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | 11.99% | 15.10% | 25.38% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Omega Flex Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Omega Flex Inc | 21.72 | 2.70 |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | 34.25 | 5.81 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 34.19 | 5.80 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.