Omniab Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Omniab Inc (OABI) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Omniab Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 40M vs 20,934M combined for its competitors (0.2% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-60.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+17.4%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Omniab Inc generated 78.3% revenue growth year over year in Q3 2026, vs 30.5% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -393.9% net margin compares with 25.0% for the peer group.
- Scale: Omniab Inc ranks #27 of 46 companies by market capitalization in the Medical Laboratories industry, holding 0.2% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Omniab Inc accounted for 0.1% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.1% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.45M compares with $0.49M for the peer group (0.9x).
- Structure: Omniab Inc operates in the following segments: Reportable.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
OABI Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026
Omniab Inc reported revenue growth of 78.34 % year on year in Q3 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 30.51 %.
With a net margin of -393.89 %, Omniab Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (24.99 %).
Omniab Inc generated 0.06 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.05 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Omniab Inc vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Omniab Inc reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Omniab Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Omniab Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Omniab Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Medical Laboratories industry grew revenue 9.0% year over year, combined, vs 78.3% for Omniab Inc. Omniab Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.01%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Omniab Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omniab Inc | - | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (13) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (5) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
OABI Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
OABI Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
OABI Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Twist Bioscience Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Iovance Biotherapeutics inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Abcellera Biologics Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Charles River Laboratories International inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Bruker Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Omniab Inc's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Omniab Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Omniab Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Omniab Inc |
685.91 | 40.21 |
 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc |
96,330.43 | 16,896.20 |
 Charles River Laboratories International inc |
16,529.99 | 3,998.99 |
 Bruker Corporation |
9,919.36 | 3,512.50 |
 Twist Bioscience Corporation |
8,289.30 | 431.80 |
 Crispr Therapeutics Ag |
4,651.31 | 25.17 |
| SUBTOTAL | 146,503.62 | 26,471.68 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Omniab Inc .
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Omniab Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Omniab Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Omniab Inc reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| AbCellera Biologics Inc. | Company report | 85% |
| Bruker Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Company report | 85% |
| Evotec SE | Company report | 85% |
| Twist Bioscience Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Charles River Labs Inc. | Company report | 85% |
| Sartorius AG | Company report | 85% |
| Fluidic Sciences Ltd | Company report | 85% |
| Nona Biosciences | Company report | 85% |
| WuXi AppTec | Company report | 85% |
| DPBIO, Inc. | Company report | 85% |
| Leveragen, Inc. | Company report | 85% |
| Metrion Biosciences Ltd. | Company report | 85% |
| HiFiBio Inc. | Company report | 85% |
| Sphere Fluidics Ltd. | Company report | 85% |
| Harbour Antibodies BV | Company report | 85% |
| Berkeley Lights Inc. | Company report | 85% |
| Adimab LLC | Company report | 85% |
| Charles River Laboratories International inc | Company report | 85% |
| Ibio inc | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Omniab Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Omniab Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Omniab Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
| Charles River Laboratories International inc | Discovery and Safety Assessment 60.68 % |
| Bruker Corporation | BSI CALID 38.44 % |
| Twist Bioscience Corporation | Reportable 100.00 % |
| Iovance Biotherapeutics inc | Single reportable segment 100.00 % |
| Intellia Therapeutics Inc | Development of Gene Editing Based Therapies 100.00 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Omniab Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Omniab Inc | 686 | 451,809 | -488,461 |
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc | 96,330 | 1,096,444 | 312,615 |
| Charles River Laboratories International inc | 16,530 | 202,994 | -11,995 |
| Bruker Corporation | 9,919 | 316,870 | -10,627 |
| Twist Bioscience Corporation | 8,289 | 441,060 | -139,650 |
| Crispr Therapeutics Ag | 4,651 | 125,234 | -2,269,328 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 145,818 | 486,848 | 54,454 |
Omniab Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Charles River Laboratories International inc | United States 55.12 % |
| Bruker Corporation | Europe excluding Germany 31.47 % |
| Twist Bioscience Corporation | Americas 58.08 % |
| Iovance Biotherapeutics inc | US 98.66 % |
| Maxcyte inc | US 68.55 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Omniab Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 41 companies in Omniab Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Omniab Inc ranks #27 of 41 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.19 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 801, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Iqvia Holdings Inc | 46,005 | 12.88 % |
| 2 | Natera Inc | 45,226 | 12.66 % |
| 3 | Ge Healthcare Technologies Inc | 37,736 | 10.56 % |
| 4 | Labcorp Holdings Inc | 30,068 | 8.42 % |
| 5 | Quest Diagnostics Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Koninklijke Philips Nv | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Incyte Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Guardant Health Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Medpace Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Charles River Laboratories International inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 27 | Omniab Inc | 683 | 0.19 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Omniab Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-11-10.
Omniab Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | Absci Corp | 1,679 | 219.64 % |
| 23 | Lumexa Imaging Holdings Inc | 1,317 | - |
| 24 | Castle Biosciences Inc | 1,034 | 2.94 % |
| 25 | Fulgent Genetics Inc | 741 | 0.42 % |
| 26 | Lightwave Logic Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 27 | Omniab Inc | 683 | 284.42 % |
| 28 | Nrc Health | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 29 | Onemednet Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 30 | Maxcyte inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 31 | Exagen Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 32 | Sera Prognostics Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Omniab Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-11-10. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Omniab Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Medical Laboratories industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (77 companies). See the full Medical Laboratories industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 63.70 % | 33.04 % (avg) | +30.7 pp |
| Operating Margin | - | industry median | - |
| EBITDA Margin | -23.22 % | -4.66 % (avg) | -18.6 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.71 % | 7.45 % (avg) | -6.7 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Omniab Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Medical Laboratories industry average (77 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Medical Laboratories industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 39.0x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 20.9x | - |
| P/B | 1.7x | 4.3x | -2.6x |
| Return on Equity | -16.73 % | industry aggregate | -32.77 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -7.68 % | -7.64 % (avg) | -0.04 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Omniab Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | - | -42.17 % | -22.75 % | -29.27 % |
| Operating Margin | - | - | - | - | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | -7.43 % | -9.35 % | -11.62 % | -11.18 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Omniab Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
See Methodology: BCG Growth-Share Matrix for how relative share and growth are calculated and thresholded.
Omniab Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.01x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 5.6% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Omniab Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 801 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.71 % vs industry average 7.45 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Omniab Inc's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Omniab Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
Omniab Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Omniab Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 32.8 points below the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-60.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.01x).
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Omniab Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Omniab Inc | 1.68 | 4.43 | - |
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc | 0.58 | 3.56 | 0.06 |
| Charles River Laboratories International inc | 0.18 | 1.34 | 0.78 |
| Bruker Corporation | 0.15 | 1.74 | 0.74 |
| Twist Bioscience Corporation | 1.43 | 3.10 | 0.03 |
| Crispr Therapeutics Ag | 2.24 | 16.26 | 0.25 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Omniab Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Omniab Inc | Q3 2026 | +78.3 % | - |
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc | Q3 2026 | +36.3 % | +33.5 % |
| Charles River Laboratories International inc | Q2 2026 | -2.7 % | - |
| Bruker Corporation | Q3 2026 | +1.6 % | - |
| Twist Bioscience Corporation | Q2 2026 | +23.2 % | - |
| Crispr Therapeutics Ag | Q3 2026 | +1,325.1 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +22.0 % | +95.7 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Omniab Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Omniab Inc | Q3 2026 | +2,031.0 % | - |
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc | Q3 2026 | +104.1 % | +49.1 % |
| Charles River Laboratories International inc | Q2 2026 | - | -11.9 % |
| Bruker Corporation | Q3 2026 | -7.5 % | +2.9 % |
| Twist Bioscience Corporation | Q2 2026 | +24.9 % | +6.5 % |
| Crispr Therapeutics Ag | Q3 2026 | - | +459.5 % |
Omniab Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Omniab Inc | - | - | - |
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc | 11.50% | 13.00% | 15.07% |
| Charles River Laboratories International inc | - | - | - |
| Bruker Corporation | - | - | - |
| Twist Bioscience Corporation | - | - | - |
| Crispr Therapeutics Ag | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Omniab Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Omniab Inc | - | 17.06 |
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc | 20.18 | 5.70 |
| Charles River Laboratories International inc | - | 4.13 |
| Bruker Corporation | - | 2.82 |
| Twist Bioscience Corporation | - | 19.20 |
| Crispr Therapeutics Ag | - | 184.78 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 50.30 | 5.53 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.