Rebus Holdings Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Rebus Holdings Inc (NSPX) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Rebus Holdings Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebus Holdings Inc | - | - | - | Yes |
| Competitors combined (4) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
NSPX Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Digitalocean Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Box Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Pagerduty Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Rebus Holdings Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Publicly Traded Peers of Rebus Holdings Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Rebus Holdings Inc | 0.43 | -2.58 |
| Digitalocean Holdings Inc | 17,085.25 | 1,011.10 |
| Box Inc | 4,575.80 | 1,232.76 |
| Pagerduty Inc | 1,183.16 | 494.36 |
| Domo Inc | 163.30 | 313.85 |
| SUBTOTAL | 23,007.93 | 3,049.48 |
Sources: Rebus Holdings Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Rebus Holdings Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Rebus Holdings Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rebus Holdings Inc | 0 | - | - |
| Digitalocean Holdings Inc | 17,085 | 691,585 | 161,853 |
| Box Inc | 4,576 | 423,338 | 34,507 |
| Pagerduty Inc | 1,183 | 428,014 | 158,889 |
| Domo Inc | 163 | 358,276 | -48,111 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 23,008 | 476,513 | 74,705 |
Rebus Holdings Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Pagerduty Inc | United States 71.12 % |
| Domo Inc | United States 79.88 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Rebus Holdings Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Major Pharmaceutical Preparations industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (342 companies). See the full Major Pharmaceutical Preparations industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 100.00 % | 64.69 % (avg) | +35.3 pp |
| Operating Margin | -4.01 % | industry median | +260.0 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 92.18 % | -7.31 % (avg) | +99.5 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.00 % | 4.92 % (avg) | -4.9 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Rebus Holdings Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 4.92 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Rebus Holdings Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Rebus Holdings Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Rebus Holdings Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Rebus Holdings Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / High strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Rebus Holdings Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 260.0 points above the industry median.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 354.1 points below the industry aggregate.
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-19.1% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Rebus Holdings Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rebus Holdings Inc | 0.01 | 0.01 | - |
| Digitalocean Holdings Inc | 0.84 | 1.16 | 2.76 |
| Box Inc | 0.50 | 1.11 | - |
| Pagerduty Inc | 0.87 | 2.08 | 1.55 |
| Domo Inc | 0.05 | 0.40 | - |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Rebus Holdings Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rebus Holdings Inc | Q2 2023 | - | - |
| Digitalocean Holdings Inc | Q2 2026 | +29.0 % | -0.5 % |
| Box Inc | Q2 2026 | +9.4 % | +62.2 % |
| Pagerduty Inc | Q2 2026 | +0.8 % | -18.1 % |
| Domo Inc | Q2 2026 | -3.6 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +12.6 % | +59.1 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Rebus Holdings Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rebus Holdings Inc | Q2 2023 | - | - |
| Digitalocean Holdings Inc | Q2 2026 | +45.4 % | +164.2 % |
| Box Inc | Q2 2026 | +10.1 % | +9.4 % |
| Pagerduty Inc | Q2 2026 | +5.5 % | +10.5 % |
| Domo Inc | Q2 2026 | -12.2 % | -28.7 % |
Rebus Holdings Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rebus Holdings Inc | 1,490.20% | - | - |
| Digitalocean Holdings Inc | 10.23% | 12.45% | 55.04% |
| Box Inc | 6.72% | 13.89% | - |
| Pagerduty Inc | 18.76% | 26.63% | 71.79% |
| Domo Inc | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Rebus Holdings Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Rebus Holdings Inc | - | - |
| Digitalocean Holdings Inc | 62.80 | 16.90 |
| Box Inc | 37.64 | 3.71 |
| Pagerduty Inc | 7.51 | 2.39 |
| Domo Inc | - | 0.52 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 48.03 | 7.54 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.