Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd (NMEX) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 0M vs 959,199M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+6.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-5.8%) for its tracked peer group.
- Profitability: Its -703.8% net margin compares with 9.0% for the peer group.
- Scale: Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd ranks #118 of 155 companies by market capitalization in the Metal Mining industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
NMEX Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026
With a net margin of -703.81 %, Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd reported lower profitability than its competitors (8.98 %).
Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd generated 0.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group.
Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Northern Minerals and Exploration Ltd | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northern Minerals and Exploration Ltd | No | - | - | Yes |
| Competitors combined (70) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
NMEX Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
NMEX Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Calumet Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Zion Oil and Gas Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Gran Tierra Energy Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Par Pacific Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | W and t Offshore inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
We are a mineral resource exploration company. We compete with other mineral resource exploration companies for financing and for the acquisition of new mineral properties. Many of the mineral resource exploration companies with whom we compete have greater financial and technical resources than those available to us. Accordingly, these competitors may be able to spend greater amounts on acquisitions of mineral properties of merit, on exploration of their mineral properties and on development of their mineral properties. In addition, they may be able to afford more geological expertise in the targeting and exploration of mineral properties. This competition could result in competitors having mineral properties of greater quality and interest to prospective investors who may finance additional exploration. This competition could adversely impact on our ability to finance further exploration and to achieve the financing necessary for us to develop our mineral properties.
The petroleum industry is highly competitive. Many of the oil and gas exploration
companies with whom we compete have greater financial and technical resources
than we do. Accordingly, these competitors may be able to spend greater amounts
on acquisitions of properties of merit and on exploration. In addition, they
may be able to afford greater geological expertise in the targeting and exploration
of resource properties. This competition could result in our competitors having
resource properties of greater quality and interest to prospective investors
who may finance additional exploration, and to senior exploration companies
that may purchase resource properties or enter into joint venture agreements
with junior exploration companies. This competition could adversely impact our
ability to finance property acquisitions and further exploration.
Publicly Traded Peers of Northern Minerals and Exploration Ltd
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Northern Minerals and Exploration Ltd | 5.57 | 0.03 |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 678,400.22 | 368,757.00 |
| Chevron Corp | 407,361.69 | 215,261.00 |
| Conocophillips | 153,044.70 | 63,345.00 |
| Williams companies inc | 84,500.50 | 12,204.00 |
| Eog Resources Inc | 74,393.27 | 27,026.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 1,984,794.03 | 1,166,804.49 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Northern Minerals and Exploration Ltd .
Sources: Northern Minerals and Exploration Ltd's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Northern Minerals and Exploration Ltd versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | Corporate and Unallocated 0.20 % |
| Chevron Corp | Reportable Segment, Aggregation before Other Operating 99.73 % |
| Williams companies inc | Transmission And Gulf Of Mexico 44.10 % |
| Eog Resources Inc | United States of America 98.40 % |
| Imperial Oil Limited | Upstream 42.18 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Northern Minerals and Exploration Ltd .
Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northern Minerals and Exploration Ltd | 6 | - | - |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 678,400 | 6,357,879 | 575,414 |
| Chevron Corp | 407,362 | 5,001,533 | 487,116 |
| Conocophillips | 153,045 | 6,398,485 | 936,263 |
| Williams companies inc | 84,501 | 2,038,417 | 541,841 |
| Eog Resources Inc | 74,393 | 7,948,824 | 2,022,353 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 1,984,788 | 6,096,922 | 606,937 |
Sign in to see all peers for Northern Minerals and Exploration Ltd .
Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Occidental Petroleum Corporation | Non-US 20.75 % |
| Sharkninja Inc | North America 64.87 % |
| Sm Energy Co | Permian Basin 49.29 % |
| Ageagle Aerial Systems Inc | EMEA 37.61 % |
| Us Energy Corp | Rockies 84.98 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Sign in to see all peers for Northern Minerals and Exploration Ltd .
Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 131 companies in Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd ranks #118 of 131 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 758, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bhp Group Limited | 214,768 | 15.45 % |
| 2 | Southern Copper Corp | 168,001 | 12.09 % |
| 3 | Rio Tinto Plc | 154,035 | 11.08 % |
| 4 | Newmont Corporation | 123,825 | 8.91 % |
| 5 | Freeport mcmoran Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Wheaton Precious Metals Corp | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Franco nevada Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Anglogold Ashanti Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Cameco Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 118 | Northern Minerals and Exploration Ltd | 5 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-25.
Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 113 | Nevada Canyon Gold Corp | 11 | - |
| 114 | Mineralrite Corporation | 8 | - |
| 115 | Lithium Corporation | 6 | - |
| 116 | Adamant Dri Processing And Minerals Group | 6 | - |
| 117 | Golden Star Resource Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 118 | Northern Minerals and Exploration Ltd | 5 | - |
| 119 | Foremost Clean Energy Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 120 | Silver Bull Resources Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 121 | China Natural Resources Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 122 | Golden Minerals Co | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 123 | Liberty Star Uranium and Metals Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Metal Mining industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (72 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 12.49 % | 43.61 % (avg) | -31.1 pp |
| Operating Margin | -868.16 % | industry median | -884.8 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -1,349.41 % | 21.74 % (avg) | -1,371.1 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.00 % | 19.41 % (avg) | -19.4 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Metal Mining industry average (72 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 21.8x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 13.3x | - |
| P/B | -37.0x | 3.5x | -40.5x |
| Return on Equity | 135.21 % | industry aggregate | 117.31 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 96.92 % | 7.81 % (avg) | 89.11 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | -19.88 % | -102.95 % | - | - | - | - | - |
| Operating Margin | -457.73 % | -2,133.76 % | 9,155.77 % | - | - | - | - | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | 43.55 % | 90.34 % | 7.62 % | 13.33 % | 14.35 % | 27.45 % | 60.49 % | 196.22 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd falls in the Question Mark quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 33.6% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 758 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 19.41 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd falls in the Medium attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Return on equity 117.3 points above the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+6.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 884.8 points below the industry median.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 33.6% median pace.
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (32.80 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-5.8% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northern Minerals and Exploration Ltd | 0.06 | 0.15 | - |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 0.13 | 1.11 | 0.17 |
| Chevron Corp | 0.01 | 1.16 | 0.21 |
| Conocophillips | 0.49 | 1.36 | 0.45 |
| Williams companies inc | - | 0.54 | 1.94 |
| Eog Resources Inc | 0.78 | 1.71 | 0.26 |
Sign in to see all peers for Northern Minerals and Exploration Ltd .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northern Minerals and Exploration Ltd | Q1 2026 | - | - |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | Q2 2026 | +42.3 % | +97.5 % |
| Chevron Corp | Q2 2026 | +56.3 % | +385.6 % |
| Conocophillips | Q2 2026 | +36.8 % | +98.8 % |
| Williams companies inc | Q2 2026 | +9.8 % | +50.3 % |
| Eog Resources Inc | Q2 2026 | +57.4 % | +102.5 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +21.6 % | +124.5 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Northern Minerals and Exploration Ltd .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northern Minerals and Exploration Ltd | Q1 2026 | - | - |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | Q2 2026 | - | +3.9 % |
| Chevron Corp | Q2 2026 | +36.3 % | +22.3 % |
| Conocophillips | Q2 2026 | +32.0 % | - |
| Williams companies inc | Q2 2026 | - | +88.7 % |
| Eog Resources Inc | Q2 2026 | - | -0.6 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Northern Minerals and Exploration Ltd .
Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northern Minerals and Exploration Ltd | - | - | - |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 7.29% | 7.92% | 12.57% |
| Chevron Corp | 6.40% | 6.49% | 10.85% |
| Conocophillips | 7.55% | 8.36% | 14.30% |
| Williams companies inc | 5.53% | 6.55% | 21.49% |
| Eog Resources Inc | 12.96% | 16.78% | 22.38% |
Sign in to see all peers for Northern Minerals and Exploration Ltd .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Northern Minerals And Exploration Ltd's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Northern Minerals and Exploration Ltd | - | 176.77 |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 20.97 | 1.84 |
| Chevron Corp | 19.59 | 1.89 |
| Conocophillips | 16.72 | 2.42 |
| Williams companies inc | 27.48 | 6.92 |
| Eog Resources Inc | 10.96 | 2.75 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 17.09 | 1.70 |
Sign in to see all peers for Northern Minerals and Exploration Ltd .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.