Nate S Food Co's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Nate S Food Co (NHMD) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Nate S Food Co vs Its Competitors
- Profitability: Its -351.7% net margin compares with 10.3% for the peer group.
- Scale: Nate S Food Co ranks #97 of 116 companies by market capitalization in the Miscellaneous Financial Services industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Nate S Food Co accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
NHMD Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2021
With a net margin of -351.66 %, Nate S Food Co reported lower profitability than its competitors (10.25 %).
Nate S Food Co generated 0.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group.
API endpoints for this dataset
Nate S Food Co vs. its Competitors, Q1 2021
Net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Nate S Food Co reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Nate S Food Co and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Nate s Food Co | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Nate S Food Co's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
Nate S Food Co's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nate s Food Co | - | - | - | Yes |
| Competitors combined (24) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
NHMD Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
NHMD Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dupont De Nemours Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | The J M Smucker Company | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Mondel z International Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Procter and Gamble Co | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Tyson Foods Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Nate S Food Co's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Nate S Food Co's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
We operate in a highly competitive environment. We have numerous competitors
of varying sizes, including manufacturers of private label products, as well
as manufacturers of other branded food products, which compete for trade merchandising
support and consumer dollars. We compete with large conventional consumer packaged
foods companies. We also compete with natural and organic consumer packaged
foods companies. At present, there are no other companies manufacturing or distributing
aerosol delivered pancake and waffle batters.
Competitive factors in our industry include product innovation, product quality,
price, brand recognition and loyalty, product variety and ingredients, product
packaging and package design, effectiveness of marketing and promotional activity,
and our ability to identify and satisfy consumer tastes and preferences.
Publicly Traded Peers of Nate s Food Co
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Nate s Food Co |
- | 0.00 |
 Procter and Gamble Co |
403,543.01 | 87,922.00 |
 Pepsico Inc |
196,765.98 | 98,241.00 |
 Mondel z International Inc |
85,376.00 | 39,898.00 |
 Alterola Biotech Inc |
64,803.71 | 251.75 |
 Kellanova |
29,204.00 | 12,670.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 886,883.02 | 392,739.38 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Nate s Food Co .
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Nate s Food Co versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Nate S Food Co's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Procter and Gamble Co | Fabric & Home Care 35.25 % |
| Pepsico Inc | PepsiCo Beverages North America 30.49 % |
| Mondel z International Inc | Europe 35.64 % |
| Kellanova | North America 49.91 % |
| Tyson Foods Inc | Beef 37.15 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Nate S Food Co's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nate s Food Co | - | - | - |
| Procter and Gamble Co | 403,543 | 845,404 | 154,750 |
| Pepsico Inc | 196,766 | 321,049 | 35,768 |
| Mondel z International Inc | 85,376 | 438,440 | 44,901 |
| Alterola Biotech Inc | 64,804 | - | - |
| Kellanova | 29,204 | 550,870 | 56,217 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 886,883 | 463,687 | 38,560 |
Nate S Food Co's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Procter and Gamble Co | Non-US 52.05 % |
| Dupont De Nemours Inc | Asia Pacific 23.77 % |
| The J M Smucker Company | United States 94.68 % |
| Pilgrim s Pride Corporation | United States 55.08 % |
| The Simply Good Foods Company | North America 97.96 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Nate S Food Co's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 99 companies in Nate S Food Co's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Nate S Food Co ranks #97 of 99 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,609, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | American Express Company | 218,570 | 36.47 % |
| 2 | Nu Holdings Ltd | 59,649 | 9.95 % |
| 3 | Strategy Inc | 43,355 | 7.23 % |
| 4 | Coinbase Global Inc | 35,534 | 5.93 % |
| 5 | Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Synchrony Financial | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Sofi Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Eason Technology Limited | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Circle Internet Group Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Chime Financial Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 97 | Nate s Food Co | 1 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Nate S Food Co's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-11-10.
Nate S Food Co's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 92 | Nft Limited | 4 | -99.89 % |
| 93 | Decentral Life Inc | 3 | - |
| 94 | Dave Inc | 2 | - |
| 95 | Abits Group Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 96 | Magic Empire Global Limited | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 97 | Nate s Food Co | 1 | - |
| 98 | The Awareness Group Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 99 | Shf Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 100 | Nextplay Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Nate S Food Co's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-11-11. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Nate S Food Co's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | - | - | - | - |
| Operating Margin | - | 19,084.86 % | - | - | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | - | - | - | - |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Nate S Food Co's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
See Methodology: BCG Growth-Share Matrix for how relative share and growth are calculated and thresholded.
Nate S Food Co falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 2.8% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: American Express Company alone holds 36% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
Nate S Food Co's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Moderate | Industry HHI of 1,609 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Nate S Food Co's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Nate S Food Co's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
Nate S Food Co falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Nate S Food Co's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Industry dominated by American Express Company, holding 36.47 % of industry market cap.
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Nate S Food Co's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nate s Food Co | - | 0.04 | - |
| Procter and Gamble Co | 0.26 | 0.71 | 0.71 |
| Pepsico Inc | 0.30 | 0.91 | 2.38 |
| Mondel z International Inc | - | 0.59 | 0.77 |
| Alterola Biotech Inc | 0.09 | 0.24 | - |
| Kellanova | 0.08 | 0.74 | 1.39 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Nate S Food Co's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nate s Food Co | Q4 2021 | - | - |
| Procter and Gamble Co | Q3 2026 | +4.0 % | -1.0 % |
| Pepsico Inc | Q3 2026 | +5.6 % | +16.4 % |
| Mondel z International Inc | Q3 2026 | +2.3 % | +74.9 % |
| Alterola Biotech Inc | Q3 2024 | - | - |
| Kellanova | Q3 2025 | +0.8 % | -15.1 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +0.8 % | +3.7 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Nate S Food Co's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nate s Food Co | Q4 2021 | +12.3 % | - |
| Procter and Gamble Co | Q3 2026 | +7.3 % | +13.8 % |
| Pepsico Inc | Q3 2026 | +3.7 % | -7.7 % |
| Mondel z International Inc | Q3 2026 | -15.3 % | -2.0 % |
| Alterola Biotech Inc | Q3 2024 | - | - |
| Kellanova | Q3 2025 | +5.8 % | +0.7 % |
Nate S Food Co's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nate s Food Co | - | - | - |
| Procter and Gamble Co | 12.54% | 17.47% | 29.71% |
| Pepsico Inc | 9.90% | 13.66% | 50.41% |
| Mondel z International Inc | 5.72% | 7.76% | 15.56% |
| Alterola Biotech Inc | - | - | - |
| Kellanova | 8.26% | 13.13% | 31.51% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Nate S Food Co's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Nate s Food Co | - | - |
| Procter and Gamble Co | 25.36 | 4.59 |
| Pepsico Inc | 18.08 | 2.00 |
| Mondel z International Inc | 21.04 | 2.14 |
| Alterola Biotech Inc | 30.35 | 257.41 |
| Kellanova | 22.86 | 2.30 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 27.16 | 2.26 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.