The Duckhorn Portfolio Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of The Duckhorn Portfolio Inc (NAPA) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: The Duckhorn Portfolio Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 365M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-31.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Peer revenue share: The Duckhorn Portfolio Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
NAPA Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2024
The Duckhorn Portfolio Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Nonalcoholic Beverages industry grew revenue 8.4% year over year, combined, vs -38.6% for The Duckhorn Portfolio Inc. The Duckhorn Portfolio Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.06% to 0.03%, a loss of 0.02 percentage points.
The Duckhorn Portfolio Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Duckhorn Portfolio Inc | Yes | No | No | No |
| High-Confidence Competitors (5) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
NAPA Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
NAPA Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
NAPA Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
The Duckhorn Portfolio Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
The Duckhorn Portfolio Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Carparts com Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Advance Auto Parts Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| E&J Gallo | Named by the company | 85% |
| The Wine Group | Named by the company | 85% |
| Decoy | Named by the company | 85% |
| Sonoma-Cutrer | Named by the company | 85% |
| Standard Motor Products Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Calera | Named by the company | 85% |
| Jackson Family Wines | Named by the company | 85% |
| Trinchero | Named by the company | 85% |
| Duckhorn Vineyards | Named by the company | 85% |
| Ste. Michelle | Named by the company | 85% |
| Constellation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Kosta Browne | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for The Duckhorn Portfolio Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.