Metavia Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Metavia Inc (MTVA) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Metavia Inc vs Its Competitors
- Scale: Metavia Inc ranks #403 of 544 companies by market capitalization in the Major Pharmaceutical Preparations industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
Metavia Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metavia Inc | - | - | - | Yes |
| Competitors combined (24) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
MTVA Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
MTVA Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Climb Bio Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Spruce Biosciences Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Gossamer Bio Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Opus Genetics Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Amylyx Pharmaceuticals Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Metavia Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Publicly Traded Peers of Metavia Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Metavia Inc | 9.31 | - |
| Biomarin Pharmaceutical Inc | 11,668.02 | 3,406.61 |
| Axsome Therapeutics Inc | 9,551.35 | 776.57 |
| Crinetics Pharmaceuticals Inc | 8,967.32 | 42.16 |
| Alkermes Plc | 7,029.33 | 1,667.65 |
| Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc | 3,704.49 | 13.17 |
| SUBTOTAL | 54,199.04 | 7,706.30 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Metavia Inc .
Sources: Metavia Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Metavia Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Metavia Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Biomarin Pharmaceutical Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
| Crinetics Pharmaceuticals Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
| Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc | Reportable Segment Aggregation Before Other Operating Segment 100.00 % |
| Theravance Biopharma inc | Single reportable segment 100.00 % |
| Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc | Product 100.00 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Metavia Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metavia Inc | 9 | - | -1,805,750 |
| Biomarin Pharmaceutical Inc | 11,668 | 1,057,626 | 22,655 |
| Axsome Therapeutics Inc | 9,551 | 839,534 | -207,183 |
| Crinetics Pharmaceuticals Inc | 8,967 | 70,970 | -844,455 |
| Alkermes Plc | 7,029 | 813,489 | 32,255 |
| Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc | 3,704 | 35,597 | -1,105,932 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 54,190 | 807,111 | -205,163 |
Metavia Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 498 companies in Metavia Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Metavia Inc ranks #403 of 498 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 827, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eli Lilly And Company | 1,060,478 | 19.39 % |
| 2 | Johnson and Johnson | 652,141 | 11.92 % |
| 3 | Beone Medicines Ltd | 560,341 | 10.24 % |
| 4 | Abbvie Inc | 468,722 | 8.57 % |
| 5 | Merck and Co Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Novartis Ag | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Abbott Laboratories | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Novo Nordisk A | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Pfizer Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 403 | Metavia Inc | 10 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Metavia Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-30.
Metavia Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 398 | Biovie Inc | 11 | -18.85 % |
| 399 | Gt Biopharma Inc | 11 | 721.82 % |
| 400 | Traws Pharma inc | 10 | -65.08 % |
| 401 | Theriva Biologics inc | 10 | -43.25 % |
| 402 | Scienture Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 403 | Metavia Inc | 10 | -83.98 % |
| 404 | Ainos Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 405 | Oncotelic Therapeutics Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 406 | Medicus Pharma Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 407 | Fibrobiologics Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 408 | Alzamend Neuro Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Metavia Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-30. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Metavia Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Major Pharmaceutical Preparations industry average (341 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Major Pharmaceutical Preparations industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 25.5x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 17.3x | - |
| P/B | 1.6x | 4.5x | -3.0x |
| Return on Equity | -209.67 % | industry aggregate | -226.92 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -107.31 % | -2.97 % (avg) | -104.34 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Metavia Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Operating Margin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | -69.80 % | -227.67 % | -160.86 % | -70.40 % | -72.88 % | -35.30 % | - | -97.13 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Metavia Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Metavia Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Metavia Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 8.1% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Metavia Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 827 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Metavia Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Metavia Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Metavia Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Metavia Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Metavia Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 226.9 points below the industry aggregate.
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (47.60 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Metavia Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metavia Inc | 1.99 | 2.06 | - |
| Biomarin Pharmaceutical Inc | 1.41 | 4.08 | 0.30 |
| Axsome Therapeutics Inc | 0.78 | 1.48 | 2.50 |
| Crinetics Pharmaceuticals Inc | 4.92 | 15.27 | - |
| Alkermes Plc | 0.82 | 2.87 | 0.43 |
| Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc | 5.87 | 18.75 | - |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Metavia Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metavia Inc | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| Biomarin Pharmaceutical Inc | Q2 2026 | +19.9 % | -81.4 % |
| Axsome Therapeutics Inc | Q2 2026 | +45.5 % | - |
| Crinetics Pharmaceuticals Inc | Q2 2026 | +2,336.3 % | - |
| Alkermes Plc | Q2 2026 | +27.0 % | -99.4 % |
| Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +22.1 % | - |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Metavia Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metavia Inc | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| Biomarin Pharmaceutical Inc | Q2 2026 | +35.1 % | +97.2 % |
| Axsome Therapeutics Inc | Q2 2026 | +0.9 % | +3,361.5 % |
| Crinetics Pharmaceuticals Inc | Q2 2026 | - | -83.7 % |
| Alkermes Plc | Q2 2026 | +98.4 % | -37.4 % |
| Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc | Q2 2026 | - | +75.2 % |
Metavia Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metavia Inc | - | - | - |
| Biomarin Pharmaceutical Inc | 0.82% | 0.91% | 1.18% |
| Axsome Therapeutics Inc | - | - | - |
| Crinetics Pharmaceuticals Inc | - | - | - |
| Alkermes Plc | 1.96% | 2.31% | 3.72% |
| Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Metavia Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Metavia Inc | - | - |
| Biomarin Pharmaceutical Inc | 166.67 | 3.43 |
| Axsome Therapeutics Inc | - | 12.30 |
| Crinetics Pharmaceuticals Inc | - | 212.72 |
| Alkermes Plc | 45.08 | 4.22 |
| Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc | - | 281.26 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | - | 7.03 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.