Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Marti Technologies Inc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Marti Technologies Inc (MRT) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2025
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
Share of combined sales, Q4 2025
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-
Q4 2025
Net Margin
-105.62 %
Q4 2025

Key Findings: Marti Technologies Inc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 39M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Marti Technologies Inc ranks #19 of 26 companies by market capitalization in the Rental & Leasing industry, holding 0.1% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Marti Technologies Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

MRT Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025

Marti Technologies Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/MRT/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/MRT/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/MRT/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Marti Technologies Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Marti Technologies Inc - Yes Yes Yes
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 100% 100% 100% 0%
Similar-Size Competitors (8) 57% 86% 57% 38%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 37.50 % (3 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 87.50 % (7 of 8) 28.60 % (2 of 7)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q4 2025

100%market share
  • Marti Technologies Inc100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Marti Technologies Inc and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Marti Technologies Inc's full market share breakdown »

MRT Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

MRT Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Marti Technologies Inc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
0%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(0 of 1)
11.1%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(1 of 9)
0%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(0 of 5)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Marti Technologies Inc -1.50 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (9) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (5) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Marti Technologies Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

MRT Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

MRT High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 1) Percent change over the selected range

MRT Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

MRT Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 9) Percent change over the selected range

MRT Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

MRT Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Marti Technologies Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company operates in the shared mobility and delivery sectors in Türkiye, markets characterized by emerging competition. Demand in these sectors is influenced by factors including limited public transportation options, low taxi availability, heavy traffic congestion, high population density, and the costs associated with private vehicle ownership. The company competes with other providers offering technology-enabled services such as car-hailing, motorcycle-hailing, taxi-hailing, e-scooters, e-bikes, e-mopeds, and delivery services. Competitors may have longer operational histories, stronger brand recognition, or greater financial, technical, and marketing resources. Some competitors offer multi-service platforms across various categories, increasing competitive pressure. The company's delivery services are in an earlier development stage and face competition from more established providers. The company operates an integrated multi-service platform that combines ride-hailing, delivery, and two-wheeled electric vehicle services, aiming to leverage shared network benefits and scalability.

Marti Technologies Inc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Centerpoint Energy Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Marti Technologies Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.