Moog Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Moog Inc (MOGA) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Moog Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 4,313M vs 120,844M combined for tracked competitors (3.4% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+3.6% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+6.0%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Moog Inc generated 15.0% revenue growth year over year in Q3 2026, vs 14.0% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 13.6% net margin compares with 10.9% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Moog Inc accounted for 3.4% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 3.3% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.32M compares with $0.48M for the peer group (0.7x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
MOGA Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026
Moog Inc reported revenue growth of 14.95 % year on year in Q3 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 14.00 %.
With a net margin of 13.62 %, Moog Inc achieved higher profitability than its competitors (10.86 %).
Moog Inc generated 3.37 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 3.34 % a year earlier.
Moog Inc vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Moog Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Moog Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (5) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Moog Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Industrial Machinery and Components industry grew revenue 12.4% year over year, combined, vs 15.0% for Moog Inc. Moog Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.79% to 0.80%, a gain of 0.02 percentage points.
Moog Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moog Inc | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (5) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (12) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 6) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
MOGA Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
MOGA Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
MOGA Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Woodward Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Parker hannifin Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Redwire Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Esco Technologies inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Rtx Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Moog Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Moog Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Moog Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Moog Inc | - | 4,312.94 |
| Rtx Corporation | 256,155.90 | 93,500.00 |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | 124,199.36 | 21,499.00 |
| Woodward Inc | 19,888.21 | 4,193.01 |
| Esco Technologies inc | 6,911.72 | 1,224.53 |
| Redwire Corporation | 2,469.23 | 427.19 |
| SUBTOTAL | 409,624.41 | 125,156.67 |
Sources: Moog Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Moog Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Moog Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Parker-Hannifin | Named by the company | 85% |
| Wittenstein Group | Named by the company | 85% |
| Altra Industrial Motion Corp | Named by the company | 85% |
| Cobham | Named by the company | 85% |
| Everaxis | Named by the company | 85% |
| John Cockerill Group | Named by the company | 85% |
| VACCO | Named by the company | 85% |
| Airbus | Named by the company | 85% |
| Beyond Gravity | Named by the company | 85% |
| Elbit Systems LTD | Named by the company | 85% |
| Glenair | Named by the company | 85% |
| Mottrol | Named by the company | 85% |
| Schleifring | Named by the company | 85% |
| Woodward | Named by the company | 85% |
| Atos S.p.A | Named by the company | 85% |
| Curtiss-Wright | Named by the company | 85% |
| General Atomics | Named by the company | 85% |
| Kongsberg | Named by the company | 85% |
| Rafael Advanced Defense Systems | Named by the company | 85% |
| Vincorion | Named by the company | 85% |
| Allied Motion | Named by the company | 85% |
| Bosch Rex | Named by the company | 85% |
| EOS Defense Systems USA, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Honeywell | Named by the company | 85% |
| Nabtesco | Named by the company | 85% |
| SEAKR | Named by the company | 85% |
| Aerojet Rocketdyne | Named by the company | 85% |
| Baumüller | Named by the company | 85% |
| Eaton | Named by the company | 85% |
| General Dynamics | Named by the company | 85% |
| Liebherr | Named by the company | 85% |
| Raytheon Technologies | Named by the company | 85% |
| Redwire Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Esco Technologies inc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Moog Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Moog Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Moog Inc | Space And Defense 30.10 % |
| Rtx Corporation | Pratt and Whitney 35.98 % |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | Diversified Industrial 66.93 % |
| Esco Technologies inc | Aerospace and Defense 49.61 % |
| Redwire Corporation | Space 54.41 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Moog Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moog Inc | - | 319,477 | 28,087 |
| Rtx Corporation | 256,156 | 519,444 | 45,139 |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | 124,199 | 359,215 | 60,969 |
| Woodward Inc | 19,888 | 411,079 | 54,121 |
| Esco Technologies inc | 6,912 | 6,062,010 | 1,558,470 |
| Redwire Corporation | 2,469 | 302,972 | -173,119 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 409,624 | 480,183 | 49,259 |
Moog Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Rtx Corporation | UNITED STATES 52.99 % |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | North America 67.21 % |
| Esco Technologies inc | US 64.34 % |
| Redwire Corporation | UNITED STATES 52.73 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Moog Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 128 companies in Moog Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Moog Inc ranks #0 of 128 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,565, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Asml Holding Nv | 688,901 | 31.96 % |
| 2 | Lam Research Corporation | 396,579 | 18.40 % |
| 3 | Deere and Co | 186,672 | 8.66 % |
| 4 | Eaton Corporation Plc | 168,034 | 7.80 % |
| 5 | Cae Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Bloom Energy Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Illinois Tool Works Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Carrier Global Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Ingersoll Rand Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Nvent Electric Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Moog Inc | 2,652 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Moog Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2020-12-11.
Moog Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Industrial Machinery and Components industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (166 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 28.34 % | 28.58 % (avg) | -0.2 pp |
| Operating Margin | 45.19 % | industry median | +39.6 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 14.79 % | 3.86 % (avg) | +10.9 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | - | 5.98 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Moog Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 8.92 % | 7.90 % | -2.66 % | 2.28 % | 6.21 % | 7.68 % | 10.13 % | 10.59 % |
| Operating Margin | 8.54 % | 10.00 % | 1.77 % | 8.44 % | 79.53 % | 77.02 % | 80.67 % | 79.52 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 6.57 % | 7.91 % | 1.29 % | 6.15 % | 59.30 % | 56.67 % | 60.39 % | 60.91 % |
| P/E | 20.6x | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Moog Inc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Moog Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Moog Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Moog Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Moderate | Industry HHI of 1,565 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Moog Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Moog Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Moog Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Moog Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / High strength cell: Invest / Grow.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Moog Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 39.6 points above the industry median.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+3.6% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Moog Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moog Inc | 0.10 | 1.97 | 0.49 |
| Rtx Corporation | 0.12 | 1.03 | 0.70 |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | 0.08 | 1.16 | 0.65 |
| Woodward Inc | 0.36 | 1.84 | 0.37 |
| Esco Technologies inc | 0.18 | 1.39 | 0.10 |
| Redwire Corporation | 0.82 | 2.26 | 0.09 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Moog Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moog Inc | Q2 2026 | +14.9 % | +159.9 % |
| Rtx Corporation | Q2 2026 | +14.5 % | +30.4 % |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | Q2 2026 | +9.8 % | +18.2 % |
| Woodward Inc | Q2 2026 | +21.3 % | +35.2 % |
| Esco Technologies inc | Q2 2026 | +14.4 % | +25.6 % |
| Redwire Corporation | Q2 2026 | +92.1 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +14.0 % | +32.3 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Moog Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moog Inc | Q2 2026 | +13,075.2 % | -15.8 % |
| Rtx Corporation | Q2 2026 | +50.7 % | +11.5 % |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | Q2 2026 | +6.8 % | +32.2 % |
| Woodward Inc | Q2 2026 | +14.2 % | +124.6 % |
| Esco Technologies inc | Q2 2026 | +13.3 % | +29.0 % |
| Redwire Corporation | Q2 2026 | +5.7 % | +76.9 % |
Moog Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moog Inc | 8.19% | 11.32% | 18.25% |
| Rtx Corporation | 4.75% | 6.63% | 12.06% |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | 11.99% | 15.10% | 25.38% |
| Woodward Inc | 11.37% | 14.40% | 21.79% |
| Esco Technologies inc | 13.05% | 15.66% | 20.04% |
| Redwire Corporation | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Moog Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Moog Inc | - | - |
| Rtx Corporation | 32.98 | 2.74 |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | 34.06 | 5.78 |
| Woodward Inc | 36.22 | 4.74 |
| Esco Technologies inc | 21.90 | 5.64 |
| Redwire Corporation | - | 5.78 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 32.06 | 3.27 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.