White River Energy's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of White River Energy (MNTM) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: White River Energy vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 1M vs 8,107M combined for its competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-94.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+15.7%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: White River Energy generated -98.4% revenue growth year over year in Q3 2023, vs -17.2% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -691,756.1% net margin compares with 18.9% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: White River Energy accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 0.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
MNTM Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2023
White River Energy reported revenue contraction of 98.38 % year on year in Q3 2023, below its competitors' combined revenue change of -17.18 %.
With a net margin of -691,756.07 %, White River Energy reported lower profitability than its competitors (18.88 %).
White River Energy generated 0.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 0.03 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
White River Energy vs. its Competitors, Q3 2023
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in White River Energy reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across White River Energy and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| White River Energy Corp | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across White River Energy's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Personal Services industry grew revenue 7.7% year over year, combined, vs -98.4% for White River Energy. White River Energy's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
White River Energy's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| White River Energy Corp | No | No | No | No |
| Competitors combined (3) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
MNTM Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Warrior Met Coal Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Peabody Energy Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for White River Energy's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Publicly Traded Peers of White River Energy Corp
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 White River Energy Corp |
0.36 | 0.88 |
 Warrior Met Coal Inc |
4,500.91 | 1,680.86 |
 Arch Resources Inc |
2,440.02 | 2,415.16 |
 Peabody Energy Corp |
2,001.41 | 4,010.90 |
| SUBTOTAL | 8,942.70 | 8,107.80 |
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on White River Energy Corp versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
White River Energy's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from White River Energy reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Peabody Energy Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Warrior Met Coal Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Arch Resources Inc | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for White River Energy's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
White River Energy's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Warrior Met Coal Inc | Mining Segment 98.64 % |
| Arch Resources Inc | Metallurgical Segment 66.80 % |
| Peabody Energy Corp | Seaborne Metallurgical Mining 33.39 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
White River Energy's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| White River Energy Corp | 0 | - | - |
| Warrior Met Coal Inc | 4,501 | 1,131,889 | 147,697 |
| Arch Resources Inc | 2,440 | 710,341 | 52,780 |
| Peabody Energy Corp | 2,001 | 742,759 | -30,796 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 8,942 | 788,227 | 22,604 |
White River Energy's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Arch Resources Inc | Foreign Countries 59.18 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
White River Energy's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Personal Services industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (88 companies). See the full Personal Services industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | - | 33.49 % (avg) | - |
| Operating Margin | - | industry median | - |
| EBITDA Margin | -148.09 % | 4.40 % (avg) | -152.5 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 589.10 % | 4.40 % (avg) | +584.7 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
White River Energy's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2017 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | - | - | - | - | -37.04 % |
| Operating Margin | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | - | -13.01 % | -12.03 % | -172.87 % | - |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
White River Energy's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Barriers to Entry | High (capital intensive) | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 589.10 % vs industry average 4.40 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on White River Energy's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
White River Energy's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
White River Energy falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
White River Energy's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-94.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- High capital intensity requires continuous reinvestment just to keep pace with the industry.
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
White River Energy's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| White River Energy Corp | 0.08 | 0.16 | - |
| Warrior Met Coal Inc | 1.24 | 3.65 | 0.07 |
| Arch Resources Inc | 0.73 | 2.40 | 0.09 |
| Peabody Energy Corp | 0.67 | 1.93 | 0.12 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
White River Energy's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| White River Energy Corp | Q4 2023 | -98.4 % | - |
| Warrior Met Coal Inc | Q2 2026 | +71.3 % | +1,459.6 % |
| Arch Resources Inc | Q3 2024 | -20.4 % | - |
| Peabody Energy Corp | Q2 2026 | +12.7 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +10.0 % | - |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
White River Energy's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| White River Energy Corp | Q4 2023 | - | -32.3 % |
| Warrior Met Coal Inc | Q2 2026 | +47.9 % | -69.3 % |
| Arch Resources Inc | Q3 2024 | -6.4 % | -22.3 % |
| Peabody Energy Corp | Q2 2026 | - | - |
White River Energy's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| White River Energy Corp | - | - | - |
| Warrior Met Coal Inc | 7.84% | 8.22% | 10.02% |
| Arch Resources Inc | 7.40% | 8.66% | 12.29% |
| Peabody Energy Corp | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
White River Energy's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| White River Energy Corp | - | 0.41 |
| Warrior Met Coal Inc | 20.46 | 2.68 |
| Arch Resources Inc | 14.28 | 1.01 |
| Peabody Energy Corp | - | 0.50 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 123.96 | 1.10 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.