Martin Marietta Materials Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Martin Marietta Materials Inc (MLM) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Martin Marietta Materials Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 6,295M vs 12,808M combined for tracked competitors (33.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+23.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+9.9%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Martin Marietta Materials Inc generated 7.5% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 15.9% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 12.9% net margin compares with -2.0% for the peer group.
- Scale: Martin Marietta Materials Inc ranks #4 of 37 companies by market capitalization in the Construction Raw Materials industry, holding 10.4% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Martin Marietta Materials Inc accounted for 35.6% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 37.4% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.67M compares with $0.74M for the peer group (0.9x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
MLM Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Martin Marietta Materials Inc reported revenue growth of 7.51 % year on year in Q2 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 15.93 %.
With a net margin of 12.89 %, Martin Marietta Materials Inc achieved higher profitability than its competitors (-1.98 %).
Martin Marietta Materials Inc generated 35.61 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 37.36 % a year earlier.
Martin Marietta Materials Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Martin Marietta Materials Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Martin Marietta Materials Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (3) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (3) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Martin Marietta Materials Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Construction Raw Materials industry grew revenue 11.9% year over year, combined, vs 7.5% for Martin Marietta Materials Inc. Martin Marietta Materials Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 2.49% to 2.39%, a loss of 0.10 percentage points.
Martin Marietta Materials Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Marietta Materials Inc | Yes | No | No | No |
| Competitors combined (7) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
MLM Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
MLM Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
MLM Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
MLM Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mdu Resources Group Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Granite Construction Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | North American Construction Group Ltd | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | United States Lime and Minerals Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Vulcan Materials Company | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Martin Marietta Materials Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Martin Marietta Materials Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Because of the impact of transportation costs on the aggregates industry, competition
in the Aggregates business tends to be limited to producers in proximity to
each of the Company’s facilities. Although all of the Company’s
locations experience competition, the Company believes that it is generally
a leading producer in the areas it serves. Competition is based primarily on
quarry or distribution location and price, but quality of aggregates and level
of customer service are also factors.
There are over 5,500 companies in the United States that produce construction
aggregates. These include active crushed stone companies and active sand and
gravel companies. The largest ten producers account for approximately 35% of
the total market. The Company’s aggregates-related downstream operations
are also characterized by numerous operators. A national trade association estimates
there are about 5,500 ready mixed concrete plants in the United States owned
by over 2,200 companies, with about 55,000 mixer trucks delivering ready mixed
concrete. Similarly, a national trade association estimates there are about
3,700 asphalt plants in the United States owned by over 800 companies. The Company,
in its Aggregates business, including its aggregates-related downstream operations,
competes with a number of other large and small producers. The Company believes
that its ability to transport materials by ocean vessels and rail have enhanced
the Company’s ability to compete in the aggregates industry.
The Company’s Magnesia Specialties business competes with various companies
in different geographic and product areas principally on the basis of quality,
price, technological advances, and technical support for its products. The Magnesia
Specialties business also competes for sales to customers located outside the
United States, with revenues from foreign jurisdictions accounting for 18% of
revenues for the Magnesia Specialties business in 2016, principally in Canada,
Mexico, Europe, South America, and the Pacific Rim.
According to the Portland Cement Association, United States cement production
is widely dispersed with the operation of 107 cement plants in 36 states. The
top five companies collectively operate 49.6% of U.S. clinker capacity with
the largest company representing 14.2% of all domestic clinker capacity. An
estimated 76.7% of U.S. clinker capacity is owned by companies headquartered
outside of the United States. In reviewing these figures for cement plants,
capacity is often stated in terms of “clinker” capacity. “Clinker”
is the initial product of cement production. Cement producers mine materials
such as limestone, shale, or other materials, crush and screen the materials,
and place them in a cement kiln. After being heated to extremely high temperatures,
these materials form marble-sized balls or pellets called “clinker”
that are then very finely ground to produce portland cement.
The Company’s Cement business competes with various companies in different
geographic and product areas principally on the basis of proximity, quality
and price for its products, but level of customer service is also a factor.
The Cement business also competes with imported cement because of the higher
value of the product and the existence of major ports in some of our markets.
Certain of the Company’s competitors in the Cement business have greater
financial resources than the Company.
The nature of the Company’s competition varies among its product lines
due to the widely differing amounts of capital necessary to build production
facilities. Crushed stone production from stone quarries or mines, or sand and
gravel production by dredging, is moderately capital intensive. The Company’s
major competitors in the aggregates markets are typically large, vertically
integrated companies, with international operations. Ready mixed concrete production
requires relatively small amounts of capital to build a concrete batching plant
and acquire delivery trucks. Accordingly, economics can lead to lower barriers
to entry in some markets. As a result, depending on the local market, the Company
may face competition from small producers as well as large, vertically integrated
companies with facilities in many markets. Construction of cement production
facilities is highly capital intensive and requires long lead times to complete
engineering design, obtain regulatory permits, acquire equipment and construct
a plant. Most domestic producers of cement are owned by large foreign companies
operating in multiple international markets. Many of these producers maintain
the capability to import cement from foreign production facilities.
Publicly Traded Peers of Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Martin Marietta Materials Inc | 29,236.43 | 6,295.00 |
| Vulcan Materials Company | 32,021.80 | 8,062.40 |
| Eagle Materials Inc | 5,498.93 | 2,324.93 |
| Granite Construction Inc | 5,051.05 | 4,968.05 |
| Mdu Resources Group Inc | 3,929.52 | 1,830.33 |
| United States Lime and Minerals Inc | 3,202.48 | 376.92 |
| SUBTOTAL | 82,404.02 | 27,982.43 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Martin Marietta Materials Inc .
Sources: Martin Marietta Materials Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Martin Marietta Materials Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Martin Marietta Materials Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Knife River Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| U s Concrete Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Vulcan Materials Company | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Martin Marietta Materials Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Martin Marietta Materials Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Marietta Materials Inc | 29,236 | 669,681 | 261,383 |
| Vulcan Materials Company | 32,022 | 686,279 | 94,884 |
| Eagle Materials Inc | 5,499 | 929,974 | 161,030 |
| Granite Construction Inc | 5,051 | 856,559 | -24,076 |
| Mdu Resources Group Inc | 3,930 | 873,248 | 93,849 |
| United States Lime and Minerals Inc | 3,202 | 1,089,350 | 388,506 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 53,168 | 740,489 | 58,497 |
Sign in to see all peers for Martin Marietta Materials Inc .
Martin Marietta Materials Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Martin Marietta Materials Inc | Building Materials Business 89.50 % |
| Vulcan Materials Company | Aggregates 78.46 % |
| Eagle Materials Inc | Cement 58.05 % |
| Granite Construction Inc | Constructions 84.01 % |
| Mdu Resources Group Inc | Natural gas distribution 76.30 % |
| United States Lime and Minerals Inc | Lime and Limestone Operations Segment 100.00 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Martin Marietta Materials Inc .
Martin Marietta Materials Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 35 companies in Martin Marietta Materials Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Martin Marietta Materials Inc ranks #4 of 35 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 10.37 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,077, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Crh Public Limited Company | 55,230 | 19.59 % |
| 2 | Cemex Sab De Cv | 42,459 | 15.06 % |
| 3 | Vulcan Materials Company | 32,022 | 11.36 % |
| 4 | Martin Marietta Materials Inc | 29,236 | 10.37 % |
| 5 | Teck Resources Limited | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Amrize Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Chemical and Mining Co Of Chile Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | James Hardie Industries Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Hecla Mining Company | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Eagle Materials Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Martin Marietta Materials Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Martin Marietta Materials Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Crh Public Limited Company | 55,230 | -26.12 % |
| 2 | Cemex Sab De Cv | 42,459 | 6.51 % |
| 3 | Vulcan Materials Company | 32,022 | -17.20 % |
| 4 | Martin Marietta Materials Inc | 29,236 | -20.13 % |
| 5 | Teck Resources Limited | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 6 | Amrize Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 7 | Chemical and Mining Co Of Chile Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 8 | James Hardie Industries Plc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 9 | Hecla Mining Company | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Martin Marietta Materials Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Martin Marietta Materials Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Construction Raw Materials industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (45 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 29.93 % | 29.19 % (avg) | +0.7 pp |
| Operating Margin | 20.95 % | industry median | +8.9 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 30.26 % | 8.38 % (avg) | +21.9 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 11.26 % | 12.01 % (avg) | -0.8 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Martin Marietta Materials Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Construction Raw Materials industry average (45 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 14.2x | 26.6x | -12.5x |
| EV / EBITDA | 21.2x | 14.0x | +7.1x |
| P/B | 3.3x | 2.6x | +0.6x |
| Return on Equity | 23.06 % | industry aggregate | 8.54 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 4.46 % | 0.69 % (avg) | 3.77 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Martin Marietta Materials Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 13.86 % | 4.96 % | -0.19 % | 14.46 % | 13.79 % | 10.00 % | -3.55 % | -5.91 % |
| Operating Margin | 16.73 % | 18.67 % | 21.26 % | 17.99 % | 19.59 % | 23.55 % | 41.42 % | 23.37 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 5.57 % | 6.08 % | 6.41 % | 5.26 % | 5.82 % | 7.35 % | 10.80 % | 5.29 % |
| P/E | 21.0x | 27.5x | 24.3x | 37.2x | 25.2x | 25.4x | 17.3x | 33.4x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Martin Marietta Materials Inc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Martin Marietta Materials Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Martin Marietta Materials Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Martin Marietta Materials Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Martin Marietta Materials Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) — a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Martin Marietta Materials Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.53x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 5.3% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Martin Marietta Materials Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 1,077 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Moderate, in line with the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 11.26 % vs industry average 12.01 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Martin Marietta Materials Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Martin Marietta Materials Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Martin Marietta Materials Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Martin Marietta Materials Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Martin Marietta Materials Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) — not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 8.9 points above the industry median.
- Return on equity 8.5 points above the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+23.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Opportunities
- Trades at a lower P/E than the industry average (14.2x vs 26.6x) despite a higher return on invested capital -- a possible re-rating opportunity.
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (50.00 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Martin Marietta Materials Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Marietta Materials Inc | 0.11 | 2.37 | 0.54 |
| Vulcan Materials Company | 0.20 | 2.24 | 0.52 |
| Eagle Materials Inc | 0.56 | 3.10 | 1.01 |
| Granite Construction Inc | 0.30 | 1.12 | 1.36 |
| Mdu Resources Group Inc | 0.08 | 0.83 | 0.90 |
| United States Lime and Minerals Inc | 17.13 | 21.29 | - |
Sign in to see all peers for Martin Marietta Materials Inc .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Martin Marietta Materials Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Marietta Materials Inc | Q2 2026 | +7.5 % | -23.5 % |
| Vulcan Materials Company | Q1 2026 | +7.4 % | +28.3 % |
| Eagle Materials Inc | Q2 2026 | +2.6 % | -17.2 % |
| Granite Construction Inc | Q2 2026 | +29.4 % | - |
| Mdu Resources Group Inc | Q2 2026 | +6.9 % | +54.1 % |
| United States Lime and Minerals Inc | Q2 2026 | +8.3 % | +11.9 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +10.9 % | -56.5 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Martin Marietta Materials Inc .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Martin Marietta Materials Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Marietta Materials Inc | Q2 2026 | +30.3 % | -28.5 % |
| Vulcan Materials Company | Q1 2026 | +5.0 % | +5.1 % |
| Eagle Materials Inc | Q2 2026 | +9.0 % | +58.7 % |
| Granite Construction Inc | Q2 2026 | +31.4 % | +3.2 % |
| Mdu Resources Group Inc | Q2 2026 | +10.8 % | +24.9 % |
| United States Lime and Minerals Inc | Q2 2026 | +5.6 % | +34.9 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Martin Marietta Materials Inc .
Martin Marietta Materials Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Marietta Materials Inc | 12.41% | 12.99% | 23.06% |
| Vulcan Materials Company | 6.62% | 6.46% | 13.03% |
| Eagle Materials Inc | 11.16% | 11.07% | 27.04% |
| Granite Construction Inc | - | - | - |
| Mdu Resources Group Inc | 2.61% | 3.06% | 6.95% |
| United States Lime and Minerals Inc | 19.24% | 19.75% | 20.76% |
Sign in to see all peers for Martin Marietta Materials Inc .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Martin Marietta Materials Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Martin Marietta Materials Inc | 11.94 | 4.64 |
| Vulcan Materials Company | 29.06 | 3.97 |
| Eagle Materials Inc | 14.03 | 2.37 |
| Granite Construction Inc | - | 1.02 |
| Mdu Resources Group Inc | 19.54 | 2.15 |
| United States Lime and Minerals Inc | 23.82 | 8.50 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 19.76 | 2.94 |
Sign in to see all peers for Martin Marietta Materials Inc .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.
