Markforged Holding's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Markforged Holding (MKFG) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Markforged Holding vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 85M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+5.2% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Peer revenue share: Markforged Holding accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
MKFG Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2024
Markforged Holding generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Computer Peripherals & Office Equipment industry grew revenue 12.3% year over year, combined, vs -7.4% for Markforged Holding. Markforged Holding's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.19% to 0.16%, a loss of 0.03 percentage points.
Markforged Holding's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Markforged Holding Corporation | No | No | No | No |
| High-Confidence Competitors (2) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
MKFG Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
MKFG Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
MKFG Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
Markforged Holding's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Markforged Holding's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Stratasys Ltd | Named by the company | 85% |
| Nano Dimension Ltd | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Markforged Holding's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.