Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Manhattan Scientifics Inc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Manhattan Scientifics Inc (MHTX) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q2 2024
Competitors
10
Named by the company
Peer Group Market Share
-
Share of combined sales, Q2 2024
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-
Peers: 4.00 %
Net Margin
-
Peers: 12.55 %

Key Findings: Manhattan Scientifics Inc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 0M vs 48,229M combined for its competitors (0.0% combined share).
  • Scale: Manhattan Scientifics Inc ranks #124 of 143 companies by market capitalization in the Industrial Machinery and Components industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
  • Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.01M compares with $0.42M for the peer group (0.0x).

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

API endpoints for this dataset

https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/MHTX/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/MHTX/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/MHTX/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.
Explore the Financial Data API

Manhattan Scientifics Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2024

TTM net margin

Manhattan Scientifics Inc -743.7 %
Competitors combined +9.8 %

TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Manhattan Scientifics Inc reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.

Competitor Financial Benchmarking - TTM Commercial

TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Manhattan Scientifics Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.

Entity TTM Revenue Latest Q ×4 Rev Run-rate vs TTM TTM Net Income TTM Net Margin
Manhattan Scientifics Inc $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitors combined $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
High-Confidence Competitors (1) $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Similar-Size Competitors (5) $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitor Financial Benchmarking

TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Manhattan Scientifics Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Manhattan Scientifics Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Manhattan Scientifics Inc - - - Yes
Competitors combined (2) 50% 100% 100% 0%
High-Confidence Competitors (4) 25% 75% 75% 0%
Similar-Size Competitors (8) 0% 71% 43% 50%

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

MHTX Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

MHTX Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Manhattan Scientifics Inc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
0%beat U.S.A. 500
Competitors Combined
(0 of 2)
0%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(0 of 2)
0%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(0 of 5)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Manhattan Scientifics Inc - -
Competitors combined (2) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (2) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (5) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Manhattan Scientifics Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

MHTX Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

MHTX High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 5) Percent change over the selected range

MHTX Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

MHTX Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months

#CompetitorTTM Share Price Returnvs U.S.A. 500
1 Abbott Laboratories 282.9% Outperformed
2 Mdxhealth Sa 282.9% Outperformed
Best-Performing Competitor Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Manhattan Scientifics Inc's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.

Manhattan Scientifics Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company holds licensed technology in its advanced materials operations, resulting in no direct competitors in that area. In the nanomedicine sector, specifically cancer detection, the company competes with Abbott Laboratories Inc., Cepheid Inc., Philips, GE Healthcare, Siemens, Gen-Probe Incorporated, MDxHealth SA, EpiGenomics AG, Roche Diagnostics, and Sequenom, Inc. Competitors may challenge the company's licensed technology, develop similar non-infringing products, or operate in regions without the company's intellectual property protection. Many competitors have longer operating histories and greater financial, marketing, and other resources, and may introduce new products targeting the company's potential markets. Key competitive factors include capitalization, product cost, speed to market, intellectual property strength, and product reliability.

Publicly Traded Peers of Manhattan Scientifics Inc

Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees
Company Market Cap Revenues Income Employees
Manhattan Scientifics Inc 0.06 0.14 -1.06 11
Abbott Laboratories 188,597.56 48,229.00 4,701.00 115,000
Mdxhealth Sa 7.20 107.88 -33.52 202
SUBTOTAL 188,604.81 48,337.02 4,666.43 115,213

Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Manhattan Scientifics Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.

Manhattan Scientifics Inc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from Manhattan Scientifics Inc reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Cepheid Inc. Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Abbott Laboratories Inc. Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
MDxHealth SA Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Sequenom, Inc. Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Philips Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Gen-Probe Incorporated Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Siemens Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
EpiGenomics AG Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Roche Diagnostics Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
GE Healthcare Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Manhattan Scientifics Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.

Manhattan Scientifics Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).
Company Largest Segment 2nd Segment 3rd Segment
Abbott Laboratories Diabetes Care 16.79 % Core Laboratory 11.05 % Adult Nutritionals 9.21 %

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).

Manhattan Scientifics Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison

Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $
CompanyMarket CapRevenue / EmployeeIncome / Employee
Manhattan Scientifics Inc 0 12,909 -96,000
Abbott Laboratories 188,598 419,383 40,878
Mdxhealth Sa 7 534,035 -165,936
PEERS TOTAL 188,605 419,584 40,516

Manhattan Scientifics Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers

Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.
Company Largest Market 2nd Market 3rd Market
Abbott Laboratories Non-US 57.70 % - -

Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.

Manhattan Scientifics Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure

Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 127 companies in Manhattan Scientifics Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.

Manhattan Scientifics Inc ranks #124 of 127 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,564, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).

Rank Company Market Cap Industry Share
1 Asml Holding Nv 581,468 32.87 %
2 Lam Research Corporation 284,908 16.10 %
3 Deere and Co 182,327 10.31 %
4 Eaton Corporation Plc 137,482 7.77 %
5 Illinois Tool Works Inc 1,234 5.2%
6 Bloom Energy Corporation 1,234 5.2%
7 Carrier Global Corporation 1,234 5.2%
8 Ingersoll Rand Inc 1,234 5.2%
9 Dover Corp 1,234 5.2%
10 Woodward Inc 1,234 5.2%
124 Manhattan Scientifics Inc 0 0.00 %
Full Industry Market Structure

Market cap and industry share for the rest of Manhattan Scientifics Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-11-12.

Manhattan Scientifics Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance

Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.
Rank Company Market Cap TTM Return 3M Momentum Beta Sharpe (1Y)
119 Originclear Inc 2 - - -0.13 0.41
120 Nauticus Robotics Inc 1 -89.55 % 46.81 % 0.04 -39.26
121 Nuburu Inc 1 -81.64 % 459.52 % 0.53 -1.54
122 U Power Limited 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
123 Li Bang International Corporation Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
124 Manhattan Scientifics Inc 0 - - 0.66 1.14
125 Peregrine Industries Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
126 Reto Eco Solutions Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
127 Advent Technologies Holdings Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
Full Same-Size Peer Performance

Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Manhattan Scientifics Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-11-13. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.

Manhattan Scientifics Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position

Valuation multiples vs the Industrial Machinery and Components industry average (177 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Industrial Machinery and Components industry valuation benchmarks.
Metric Company Industry Average Difference
P/E - 33.9x -
EV / EBITDA 0.8x 17.0x -16.2x
P/B -0.3x 3.9x -4.2x
Return on Equity - industry aggregate -
Return on Invested Capital - -0.66 % (avg) -

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.

Manhattan Scientifics Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory

Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.
Metric 20162017201820192020202120222023
Revenue Growth --------
Operating Margin --1,604.23 %------
Return on Invested Capital -56.92 %-11.46 %-19.69 %--55.24 %-12.53 %--
P/E --------

Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.

Manhattan Scientifics Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix

See Methodology: BCG Growth-Share Matrix for how relative share and growth are calculated and thresholded.

Question Mark Star Dog Cash Cow Relative Market Share (vs largest competitor) Industry Revenue Growth (%) Manhattan Scientifics Inc

Manhattan Scientifics Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 7.5% (median, trailing 12 months).

Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.

Manhattan Scientifics Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)

Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.
Force Assessment Basis
Competitive Rivalry Moderate Industry HHI of 1,564 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above)

Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Manhattan Scientifics Inc's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.

Manhattan Scientifics Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength

See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.

High Strength
Medium Strength
Low Strength
High Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Invest / Grow
Selective
Medium Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Selective
Harvest Manhattan Scientifics Inc
Low Attractiveness
Selective
Harvest
Harvest / Divest

Manhattan Scientifics Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.

Manhattan Scientifics Inc's SWOT

Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.

Strengths

No rule matched.

Weaknesses

  • Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
  • Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.

Opportunities

No rule matched.

Threats

  • Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-13.9% annualized).

Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.

Manhattan Scientifics Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison

Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months
CompanyQuick RatioWorking CapitalDebt / EquityAsset Turnover
Manhattan Scientifics Inc - 0.03 - 0.62
Abbott Laboratories 0.36 1.45 0.53 0.47
Mdxhealth Sa 0.59 1.08 - 0.73

Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Manhattan Scientifics Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers

Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodRevenue Y/YRevenue Q/QIncome Y/YIncome Q/Q
Manhattan Scientifics Inc Q2 2024----
Abbott LaboratoriesQ3 2026+14.5 %+3.3 %-44.0 %-0.9 %
Mdxhealth SaQ4 2025+19.8 %+19.8 %--
PEERS TOTAL+14.5 %+3.5 %-44.8 %-0.4 %

Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Manhattan Scientifics Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures

Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodCosts Y/YCosts Q/QCapex Y/YCapex Q/Q
Manhattan Scientifics Inc Q2 2024----
Abbott LaboratoriesQ3 2026+10.9 %+5.7 %+3.4 %+3.2 %
Mdxhealth SaQ4 2025+9.6 %+9.6 %-2.6 %-2.6 %

Manhattan Scientifics Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers

ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover
CompanyROAROIROEReceivables TurnoverInventory Turnover
Manhattan Scientifics Inc -----
Abbott Laboratories4.54%5.14%9.00%5.712.95
Mdxhealth Sa---7.35-

ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).

Manhattan Scientifics Inc's Valuation vs Peers

P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book
CompanyP/EPrice / SalesPEGP/CFPrice / Book
Manhattan Scientifics Inc -0.39---
Abbott Laboratories40.193.91--3.65
Mdxhealth Sa-0.07-0.15-
PEERS AVERAGE40.423.90-3.65

P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.

Get the full CSIMarket dataset: Subscribe API Connect Your AI