Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Mobileye Global Inc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Mobileye Global Inc (MBLY) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q2 2026
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
0.40 %
Q2 2026
Net Margin
-4.13 %
Q2 2026

Key Findings: Mobileye Global Inc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 2,016M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is holding steady (+0.8% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Mobileye Global Inc ranks #58 of 260 companies by market capitalization in the Software & Programming industry, holding 0.1% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Mobileye Global Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

MBLY Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026

Mobileye Global Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/MBLY/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/MBLY/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/MBLY/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Software & Programming industry grew revenue 16.0% year over year, combined, vs 0.4% for Mobileye Global Inc. Mobileye Global Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.18% to 0.16%, a loss of 0.02 percentage points.

Mobileye Global Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Mobileye Global inc No Yes No -
High-Confidence Competitors (14) 70% 75% 67% 43%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 78% 100% 78% 0%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 0.00 % (0 of 8) 62.50 % (5 of 8) 37.50 % (3 of 8) 28.60 % (2 of 7)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q2 2026

100%market share
  • Mobileye Global Inc100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Mobileye Global Inc and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Mobileye Global Inc's full market share breakdown »

MBLY Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

MBLY Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Mobileye Global Inc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
33.3%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(4 of 12)
10%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(1 of 10)
20%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(1 of 5)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Mobileye Global inc -56.40 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (12) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (5) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Mobileye Global Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

MBLY Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

MBLY High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 18) Percent change over the selected range

MBLY Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

MBLY Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

MBLY Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

MBLY Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Mobileye Global Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company operates in the advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) and autonomous driving industry, facing competition from Tier 1 automotive suppliers, silicon providers, and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) developing in-house solutions. Tier 1 competitors include Bosch, Continental, and Denso. Silicon provider competitors comprise Ambarella, Advanced Micro Devices, Arriver / Qualcomm, Black Sesame Technologies, Horizon Robotics, Huawei, NVIDIA, NXP, Renesas Electronics, and Texas Instruments. OEMs such as Tesla and Mercedes-Benz also compete indirectly through their own autonomous driving developments. Some competitors have announced plans to operate autonomous robotaxi services.

Mobileye Global Inc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Leddartech Holdings Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Bosch Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Huawei Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Renesas Electronics Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Qualcomm Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Arbe Robotics Ltd Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Arriver / Qualcomm Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
General Motors Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
NVIDIA Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Volvo Cars Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Advanced Micro Devices Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Continental Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Mercedes-Benz Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Tesla Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Innoviz Technologies Ltd Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Black Sesame Technologies Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Horizon Robotics Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
NXP Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Xpeng Motor Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Aptiv Plc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Ambarella Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Denso Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
NIO Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Texas Instruments Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Mobileye Global Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Mobileye Global Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).
Company Largest Segment 2nd Segment 3rd Segment
Mobileye Global inc Mobileye 98.03 % All Other Segments 1.97 % -

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).