Massimo Group's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Massimo Group (MAMO) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Massimo Group vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 64M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-7.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Scale: Massimo Group ranks #14 of 19 companies by market capitalization in the Special Transportation Services industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Massimo Group accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.64M compares with $0.26M for the peer group (2.5x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
MAMO Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Massimo Group generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Special Transportation Services industry grew revenue 8.7% year over year, combined, vs -21.1% for Massimo Group. Massimo Group's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.11% to 0.08%, a loss of 0.03 percentage points.
Massimo Group's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Massimo Group | Yes | No | No | No |
| Competitors combined (1) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 28.60 % (2 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
MAMO Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
MAMO Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
MAMO Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
MAMO Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Farmer Brothers Co | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Massimo Group's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Massimo Group's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Massimo Group
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Massimo Group | 41.60 | 64.15 |
| Farmer Brothers Co | 27.74 | 337.46 |
| SUBTOTAL | 69.34 | 401.60 |
Sources: Massimo Group's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Massimo Group versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Massimo Group's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Westrock Coffee Company | Named by the company | 85% |
| Lowes | Named by the company | 85% |
| Tractor Supply Co. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Farm King | Named by the company | 85% |
| Farmer Brothers Co | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Massimo Group's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Massimo Group's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Massimo Group | 42 | 641,479 | 39,652 |
| Farmer Brothers Co | 28 | 259,582 | -14,319 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 28 | 259,582 | -14,319 |
Massimo Group's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 18 companies in Massimo Group's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Massimo Group ranks #14 of 18 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.04 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 5,301, indicating a highly concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Southeast Airport Group | 75,777 | 71.61 % |
| 2 | Pacific Airport Group | 11,012 | 10.41 % |
| 3 | Central North Airport Group | 4,917 | 4.65 % |
| 4 | Brp Inc | 4,449 | 4.20 % |
| 5 | Corporaci n Am rica Airports S a | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Polaris Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Bristow Group Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Ads Tec Energy Public Ltd Co | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Chargepoint Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Wheels Up Experience Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 14 | Massimo Group | 42 | 0.04 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Massimo Group's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Massimo Group's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Chargepoint Holdings Inc | 230 | -17.28 % |
| 10 | Wheels Up Experience Inc | 129 | -90.37 % |
| 11 | Surf Air Mobility Inc | 117 | -73.66 % |
| 12 | Blink Charging Co | 81 | -62.51 % |
| 13 | Flyexclusive Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 14 | Massimo Group | 42 | -65.50 % |
| 15 | Volato Group Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 16 | Saker Aviation Services Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 17 | Jet ai Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 18 | Webus International Limited | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Massimo Group's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Massimo Group's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Special Transportation Services industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (20 companies). See the full Special Transportation Services industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 43.99 % | 21.21 % (avg) | +22.8 pp |
| Operating Margin | -7.03 % | industry median | +20.0 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 8.25 % | -5.06 % (avg) | +13.3 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | - | 15.33 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Massimo Group's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Special Transportation Services industry average (20 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Special Transportation Services industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 9.8x | 10.7x | -0.8x |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.9x | 9.2x | -2.2x |
| P/B | 1.8x | 3.3x | -1.5x |
| Return on Equity | 17.21 % | industry aggregate | 175.21 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -7.88 % | 1.67 % (avg) | -9.55 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Massimo Group's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | -4.08 % | -35.68 % |
| Operating Margin | - | 6.17 % | -10.85 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | 13.09 % | -12.45 % |
| P/E | - | 61.1x | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Massimo Group's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Massimo Group's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Massimo Group is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Massimo Group's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Massimo Group's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Massimo Group falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 6.5% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Southeast Airport Group alone holds 72% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
Massimo Group's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Low | Industry HHI of 5,301 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Massimo Group's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Massimo Group's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Massimo Group's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Massimo Group falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Massimo Group's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 20.0 points above the industry median.
- Return on equity 175.2 points above the industry aggregate.
Weaknesses
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-7.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (100.00 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Southeast Airport Group, holding 71.61 % of industry market cap.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Massimo Group's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Massimo Group | 0.23 | 1.91 | - |
| Farmer Brothers Co | 0.07 | 1.25 | 0.49 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Massimo Group's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Massimo Group | Q2 2026 | -21.1 % | +1,769.2 % |
| Farmer Brothers Co | Q4 2025 | -1.7 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | -5.1 % | - |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Massimo Group's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Massimo Group | Q2 2026 | -36.6 % | - |
| Farmer Brothers Co | Q4 2025 | +9.8 % | -9.9 % |
Massimo Group's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Massimo Group | 8.40% | 11.58% | 17.21% |
| Farmer Brothers Co | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Massimo Group's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Massimo Group | 9.99 | 0.65 |
| Farmer Brothers Co | - | 0.08 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | - | 0.17 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.