Dragon Victory International Ltd's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Dragon Victory International Ltd (LYL) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Dragon Victory International Ltd vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 45M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Peer revenue share: Dragon Victory International Ltd accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
LYL Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025
Dragon Victory International Ltd generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group.
Dragon Victory International Ltd's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dragon Victory International Ltd | - | - | - | - |
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
LYL Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
LYL Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
Dragon Victory International Ltd's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Dragon Victory International Ltd's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Guangzhou Baturu Information Technology Co., Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Atif Holdings Ltd | Named by the company | 85% |
| Kaisi Times Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| JD.com, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Alibaba Group Holding Limited | Named by the company | 85% |
| Jingu Co., Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Dragon Victory International Ltd's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.