Spark Networks Se's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Spark Networks Se (LOV) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Spark Networks Se vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 172M vs 4,413M combined for tracked competitors (3.8% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-4.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs holding steady (-1.3%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Spark Networks Se generated -14.2% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2023, vs 7.3% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 0.1% net margin compares with 13.5% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Spark Networks Se accounted for 3.6% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 4.5% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.69M compares with $1.58M for the peer group (0.4x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
LOV Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2023
Spark Networks Se reported revenue contraction of 14.23 % year on year in Q2 2023, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 7.32 %.
With a net margin of 0.13 %, Spark Networks Se reported lower profitability than its competitors (13.47 %).
Spark Networks Se generated 3.64 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 4.52 % a year earlier.
Spark Networks Se vs. its Competitors, Q2 2023
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Spark Networks Se and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Spark Networks Se | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (5) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Spark Networks Se's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Personal Services industry grew revenue 9.9% year over year, combined, vs -14.2% for Spark Networks Se. Spark Networks Se's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.14% to 0.11%, a loss of 0.03 percentage points.
Spark Networks Se's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spark Networks Se | No | No | No | No |
| Competitors combined (2) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
LOV Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
LOV Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Match Group Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Bumble Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Spark Networks Se's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Publicly Traded Peers of Spark Networks Se
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Spark Networks Se | 0.56 | 172.36 |
| Match Group Inc | 9,935.86 | 3,519.95 |
| Bumble Inc | 331.54 | 893.24 |
| SUBTOTAL | 10,267.95 | 4,585.55 |
Sources: Spark Networks Se's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Spark Networks Se versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Spark Networks Se's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Match Group Inc | Tinder 54.24 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Spark Networks Se's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spark Networks Se | 1 | 689,448 | -28,336 |
| Match Group Inc | 9,936 | 1,593,460 | 300,016 |
| Bumble Inc | 332 | 1,540,064 | -1,074,938 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 10,267 | 1,582,356 | 14,081 |
Spark Networks Se's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Bumble Inc | Non-US 58.00 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Spark Networks Se's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Personal Services industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (52 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 43.50 % | 51.45 % (avg) | -8.0 pp |
| Operating Margin | -23.03 % | industry median | -22.0 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -2.12 % | 2.88 % (avg) | -5.0 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 1.52 % | 3.94 % (avg) | -2.4 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Spark Networks Se's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Personal Services industry average (52 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 21.1x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 11.4x | - |
| P/B | -0.2x | 2.4x | -2.5x |
| Return on Equity | 67.96 % | industry aggregate | 39.23 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -81.50 % | 3.66 % (avg) | -85.16 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Spark Networks Se's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -11.19 % | -21.92 % | -27.10 % | 500.00 % | -6.92 % | -13.44 % |
| Operating Margin | -1.52 % | -2.28 % | -22.48 % | -15.91 % | -15.68 % | -10.30 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -3.43 % | -2.81 % | -18.54 % | -35.55 % | -16.57 % | -13.05 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Spark Networks Se's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Spark Networks Se's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Spark Networks Se is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Spark Networks Se's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 1.52 % vs industry average 3.94 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Spark Networks Se's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Spark Networks Se's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Spark Networks Se's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Spark Networks Se falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Spark Networks Se's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Return on equity 39.2 points above the industry aggregate.
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 22.0 points below the industry median.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-4.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Spark Networks Se's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spark Networks Se | 0.08 | 0.15 | - |
| Match Group Inc | 0.84 | 1.25 | - |
| Bumble Inc | 1.22 | 1.90 | 0.75 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Spark Networks Se's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spark Networks Se | Q2 2023 | -14.2 % | - |
| Match Group Inc | Q1 2026 | +3.9 % | +41.9 % |
| Bumble Inc | Q2 2026 | -15.2 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | -1.0 % | - |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Spark Networks Se's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spark Networks Se | Q2 2023 | -37.3 % | -28.9 % |
| Match Group Inc | Q1 2026 | -11.1 % | +32.1 % |
| Bumble Inc | Q2 2026 | -27.4 % | - |
Spark Networks Se's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spark Networks Se | - | - | - |
| Match Group Inc | 15.34% | 20.75% | - |
| Bumble Inc | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Spark Networks Se's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Spark Networks Se | - | 0.00 |
| Match Group Inc | 15.20 | 2.82 |
| Bumble Inc | - | 0.37 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 319.01 | 2.24 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.