Loma Negra Compa A Industrialargentina Sociedad An Nima's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Loma Negra Compa A Industrialargentina Sociedad An Nima (LOMA) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Loma Negra Compa A Industrialargentina Sociedad An Nima vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 22,139M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Scale: Loma Negra Compa A Industrialargentina Sociedad An Nima ranks #33 of 37 companies by market capitalization in the Construction Raw Materials industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Loma Negra Compa A Industrialargentina Sociedad An Nima accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
LOMA Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025
Loma Negra Compa A Industrialargentina Sociedad An Nima generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Construction Raw Materials industry grew revenue 47.2% year over year, combined, vs 21.3% for Loma Negra Compa A Industrialargentina Sociedad An Nima. Loma Negra Compa A Industrialargentina Sociedad An Nima's share of combined industry revenue moved from 33.24% to 27.39%, a loss of 5.85 percentage points.
Loma Negra Compa A Industrialargentina Sociedad An Nima's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loma Negra Compa a Industrialargentina Sociedad An nima | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Similar-Size Competitors (7) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
LOMA Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
LOMA Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
LOMA Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
Loma Negra Compa A Industrialargentina Sociedad An Nima's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Loma Negra Compa A Industrialargentina Sociedad An Nima's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Cementos Avellaneda S.A. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Juan Minetti S.A. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Holcim Argentina | Named by the company | 85% |
| Votorantim Cimentos S.A. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Cementos Molins, S.A. | Named by the company | 85% |
| LafargeHolcim | Named by the company | 85% |
| Holcim Argentina S.A. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Corcemar S.A. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Petroquímica Comodoro Rivadavia S.A. | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Loma Negra Compa A Industrialargentina Sociedad An Nima's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
