Lockheed Martin's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Lockheed Martin (LMT) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Lockheed Martin vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 77,014M vs 395,444M combined for tracked competitors (16.3% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+4.2% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+5.6%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Lockheed Martin generated 10.5% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 9.7% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 9.2% net margin compares with 9.7% for the peer group.
- Scale: Lockheed Martin ranks #2 of 56 companies by market capitalization in the Aerospace & Defense industry, holding 15.2% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Lockheed Martin accounted for 16.1% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 16.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.63M compares with $0.56M for the peer group (1.1x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
LMT Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Lockheed Martin reported revenue growth of 10.51 % year on year in Q2 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 9.71 %.
With a net margin of 9.15 %, Lockheed Martin reported lower profitability than its competitors (9.72 %).
Lockheed Martin generated 16.11 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 16.02 % a year earlier.
Lockheed Martin vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Lockheed Martin and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (16) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (5) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Lockheed Martin's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Aerospace & Defense industry grew revenue 13.0% year over year, combined, vs 10.5% for Lockheed Martin. Lockheed Martin's share of combined industry revenue moved from 16.26% to 15.90%, a loss of 0.36 percentage points.
Lockheed Martin's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Competitors combined (44) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (21) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (6) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
LMT Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
LMT Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
LMT Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
LMT Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Viavi Solutions Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Sifco Industries Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Viasat Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Butler National Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Cpi Aerostructures Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Lockheed Martin's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Lockheed Martin's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Our broad portfolio of products and services competes both domestically and
internationally against the products and services of other large aerospace,
defense, and information technology companies, as well as numerous smaller competitors,
particularly in certain of our services businesses. We often form teams with
other companies that are competitors in other efforts to provide customers with
the best mix of capabilities to address specific requirements. In some areas
of our business, customer requirements are changing to encourage expanded competition,
such as information technology contracts where there may be a wide range of
small to large contractors bidding on procurements. Principal factors of competition
include the value of our products and services to the customer; technical and
management capability; the ability to develop and implement complex, integrated
system architectures; financing and total cost of ownership; our demonstrated
ability to execute and perform against contract requirements; and our ability
to provide timely solutions.
The competition for international sales is subject to additional U.S. Government stipulations (e.g., export restrictions, market access, technology transfer, industrial cooperation, and contracting practices). We may compete against domestic and foreign companies (or teams) for contract awards by international governments. International competitions also may be subject to different laws or contracting practices of international governments that may affect how we structure our bid for the procurement. In many international procurements, the purchasing government’s relationship with the U.S. and its industrial cooperation programs are also important factors in determining the outcome of a competition. It is common for international customers to require contractors to comply with their industrial cooperation regulations, sometimes referred to as offset requirements, and we have undertaken foreign offset agreements as part of securing some international business.
Publicly Traded Peers of Lockheed Martin Corporation
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | 119,732.91 | 77,014.00 |
| Rtx Corporation | 256,155.90 | 93,500.00 |
| Eaton Corporation Plc | 168,034.20 | 30,025.00 |
| The Boeing Company | 145,778.73 | 93,995.00 |
| General Dynamics Corporation | 91,602.95 | 53,808.00 |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | 72,025.92 | 42,892.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 1,173,915.19 | 694,126.65 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Lockheed Martin Corporation.
Sources: Lockheed Martin Corporation's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Lockheed Martin Corporation versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Lockheed Martin's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Eos Energy Enterprises Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Leidos Holdings Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Amentum Holdings Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Intuitive Machines Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| L3harris Technologies Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Cpi Aerostructures Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Kratos Defense and Security Solutions inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | Named by the company | 85% |
| Applied Energetics Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| The Boeing Company | Named by the company | 85% |
| One Stop Systems Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Cubic Corp | Named by the company | 85% |
| Icf International Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Telos Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Frequency Electronics Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Parsons Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Aerovironment Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Bwx Technologies Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Geospace Technologies Corp | Named by the company | 85% |
| Red Cat Holdings Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| DYNAMIC AEROSPACE SYSTEMS Corp | Named by the company | 85% |
| RTX Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Rtx Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| V2x Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Ess Tech Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| General Dynamics Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Lockheed Martin's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Lockheed Martin's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | Aeronautics 40.43 % |
| Rtx Corporation | Pratt and Whitney 35.98 % |
| Eaton Corporation Plc | Electrical Americas 46.31 % |
| The Boeing Company | Commercial Airplanes 47.85 % |
| General Dynamics Corporation | Marine Systems 32.36 % |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | Aeronautics Systems 32.36 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Lockheed Martin Corporation.
Lockheed Martin's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | 119,733 | 626,130 | 51,114 |
| Rtx Corporation | 256,156 | 519,444 | 45,139 |
| Eaton Corporation Plc | 168,034 | 308,572 | 39,403 |
| The Boeing Company | 145,779 | 516,456 | 13,440 |
| General Dynamics Corporation | 91,603 | 459,897 | 37,103 |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | 72,026 | 5,718,933 | 599,467 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 1,054,182 | 562,357 | 23,789 |
Sign in to see all peers for Lockheed Martin Corporation.
Lockheed Martin's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | United States 70.72 % |
| Rtx Corporation | UNITED STATES 52.99 % |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | United States 85.81 % |
| Elbit Systems Ltd | Israel 32.20 % |
| Leidos Holdings Inc | United States 91.54 % |
| Textron Inc | United States 70.21 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Sign in to see all peers for Lockheed Martin Corporation.
Lockheed Martin's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 49 companies in Lockheed Martin's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Lockheed Martin ranks #2 of 49 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 15.15 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 907, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Boeing Company | 145,779 | 18.45 % |
| 2 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | 119,733 | 15.15 % |
| 3 | Northrop Grumman Corp | 72,026 | 9.12 % |
| 4 | Transdigm Group Incorporated | 63,669 | 8.06 % |
| 5 | Garmin Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Rocket Lab Corp | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | L3harris Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Axon Enterprise Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Elbit Systems Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Teledyne Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Lockheed Martin's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Lockheed Martin's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Boeing Company | 145,779 | -11.10 % |
| 2 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | 119,733 | 7.57 % |
| 3 | Northrop Grumman Corp | 72,026 | -12.54 % |
| 4 | Transdigm Group Incorporated | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 5 | Garmin Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 6 | Rocket Lab Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 7 | L3harris Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Lockheed Martin's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Lockheed Martin's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (56 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 11.80 % | 30.24 % (avg) | -18.4 pp |
| Operating Margin | 11.88 % | industry median | +7.0 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 12.86 % | 4.83 % (avg) | +8.0 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 2.17 % | 7.10 % (avg) | -4.9 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Lockheed Martin's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Aerospace & Defense industry average (56 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 20.0x | 36.0x | -16.1x |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.4x | 21.5x | -7.1x |
| P/B | 17.1x | 5.2x | +11.9x |
| Return on Equity | 86.24 % | industry aggregate | 56.60 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 18.33 % | 2.69 % (avg) | 15.64 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Lockheed Martin's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 5.32 % | 11.25 % | 9.34 % | 2.52 % | -1.58 % | 2.41 % | 5.14 % | 5.64 % |
| Operating Margin | 13.64 % | 14.29 % | 13.22 % | 13.61 % | 12.65 % | 12.59 % | 9.87 % | 10.30 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 22.97 % | 23.57 % | 21.73 % | 20.19 % | 17.94 % | 18.21 % | 16.11 % | 15.60 % |
| P/E | 16.2x | 18.2x | 14.7x | 15.4x | 21.8x | 16.2x | 24.5x | 22.3x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Lockheed Martin's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Lockheed Martin's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Lockheed Martin is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Lockheed Martin's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Lockheed Martin's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Lockheed Martin falls in the Question Mark quadrant: relative market share of 0.82x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 15.0% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Lockheed Martin's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 907 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 2.17 % vs industry average 7.10 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Lockheed Martin's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Lockheed Martin's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Lockheed Martin's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Lockheed Martin falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Lockheed Martin's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 7.0 points above the industry median.
- Return on equity 56.6 points above the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+4.2% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 15.0% median pace.
- Trades at a lower P/E than the industry average (20.0x vs 36.0x) despite a higher return on invested capital -- a possible re-rating opportunity.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Lockheed Martin's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | 0.14 | 1.14 | 2.92 |
| Rtx Corporation | 0.12 | 1.03 | 0.70 |
| Eaton Corporation Plc | 0.05 | 1.25 | 0.79 |
| The Boeing Company | 0.08 | 1.17 | 22.01 |
| General Dynamics Corporation | 0.14 | 1.40 | 0.33 |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | 0.20 | 1.13 | 0.89 |
Sign in to see all peers for Lockheed Martin Corporation.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Lockheed Martin's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | Q2 2026 | +10.5 % | +436.8 % |
| Rtx Corporation | Q2 2026 | +14.5 % | +30.4 % |
| Eaton Corporation Plc | Q2 2026 | +21.4 % | -16.2 % |
| The Boeing Company | Q2 2026 | +8.0 % | - |
| General Dynamics Corporation | Q1 2026 | +10.3 % | +13.2 % |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | Q2 2026 | +5.1 % | -6.8 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +10.8 % | -73.9 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Lockheed Martin Corporation.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Lockheed Martin's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | Q2 2026 | +1.1 % | -9.4 % |
| Rtx Corporation | Q2 2026 | +50.7 % | +11.5 % |
| Eaton Corporation Plc | Q2 2026 | +28.1 % | +25.2 % |
| The Boeing Company | Q2 2026 | +9.0 % | +71.7 % |
| General Dynamics Corporation | Q1 2026 | +13.1 % | +43.0 % |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | Q2 2026 | +34.2 % | +30.7 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Lockheed Martin Corporation.
Lockheed Martin's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | 10.40% | 14.74% | 86.24% |
| Rtx Corporation | 4.75% | 6.63% | 12.06% |
| Eaton Corporation Plc | 7.94% | 10.71% | 19.56% |
| The Boeing Company | 1.51% | 4.33% | 105.14% |
| General Dynamics Corporation | 7.52% | 13.52% | 17.41% |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | 8.93% | 11.14% | 26.58% |
Sign in to see all peers for Lockheed Martin Corporation.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Lockheed Martin's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | 19.13 | 1.55 |
| Rtx Corporation | 32.98 | 2.74 |
| Eaton Corporation Plc | 43.98 | 5.60 |
| The Boeing Company | 67.05 | 1.55 |
| General Dynamics Corporation | 20.99 | 1.70 |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | 16.10 | 1.68 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 36.24 | 1.69 |
Sign in to see all peers for Lockheed Martin Corporation.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.