Lftd Partners Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Lftd Partners Inc (LIFD) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Lftd Partners Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 35M vs 1,594M combined for tracked competitors (2.2% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is holding steady (-1.5% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+41.3%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Lftd Partners Inc generated -15.7% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 83.0% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -16.5% net margin compares with -9.3% for the peer group.
- Scale: Lftd Partners Inc ranks #462 of 544 companies by market capitalization in the Major Pharmaceutical Preparations industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Lftd Partners Inc accounted for 1.5% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 3.3% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.35M compares with $0.46M for the peer group (0.8x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
LIFD Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Lftd Partners Inc reported revenue contraction of 15.69 % year on year in Q2 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 83.03 %.
With a net margin of -16.52 %, Lftd Partners Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (-9.32 %).
Lftd Partners Inc generated 1.52 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 3.25 % a year earlier.
Lftd Partners Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Lftd Partners Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Lftd Partners Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (5) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Lftd Partners Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Major Pharmaceutical Preparations industry grew revenue 7.2% year over year, combined, vs -15.7% for Lftd Partners Inc. Lftd Partners Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Lftd Partners Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lftd Partners Inc | No | No | No | No |
| Competitors combined (22) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | - | - | ||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 57.10 % (4 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
LIFD Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
LIFD Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
LIFD Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intercure Ltd | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Lexaria Bioscience Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Cronos Group Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Aurora Cannabis Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | National Beverage Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Lftd Partners Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Lftd Partners Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Lftd Partners Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Lftd Partners Inc | 1.50 | 35.34 |
| National Beverage Corp | 2,749.27 | 1,180.55 |
| Cronos Group Inc | 1,278.96 | 259.21 |
| Tilray Brands Inc | 449.57 | 914.63 |
| Canopy Growth Corporation | 390.76 | 323.17 |
| Sndl Inc | 358.70 | 724.94 |
| SUBTOTAL | 5,384.91 | 4,379.36 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Lftd Partners Inc .
Sources: Lftd Partners Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Lftd Partners Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Lftd Partners Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| National Beverage Corp | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Lftd Partners Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Lftd Partners Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Tilray Brands Inc | Distribution Business 33.05 % |
| Canopy Growth Corporation | Storz and Bickel 58.69 % |
| Cannapharmarx Inc | Operating Segment 100.00 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Lftd Partners Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lftd Partners Inc | 1 | 353,350 | -298,849 |
| National Beverage Corp | 2,749 | 703,967 | 109,510 |
| Cronos Group Inc | 1,279 | 424,938 | 129,843 |
| Tilray Brands Inc | 450 | 254,418 | -29,251 |
| Canopy Growth Corporation | 391 | 286,499 | -156,381 |
| Sndl Inc | 359 | - | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | 5,383 | 462,524 | -34,793 |
Sign in to see all peers for Lftd Partners Inc .
Lftd Partners Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Cronos Group Inc | Canada 56.07 % |
| Tilray Brands Inc | EMEA 39.41 % |
| Zerostack Corp | DE 92.55 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Lftd Partners Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 498 companies in Lftd Partners Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Lftd Partners Inc ranks #462 of 498 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 827, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eli Lilly And Company | 1,062,533 | 19.39 % |
| 2 | Johnson and Johnson | 664,610 | 12.13 % |
| 3 | Beone Medicines Ltd | 545,679 | 9.96 % |
| 4 | Abbvie Inc | 467,633 | 8.54 % |
| 5 | Merck and Co Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Novartis Ag | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Abbott Laboratories | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Novo Nordisk A | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Pfizer Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 462 | Lftd Partners Inc | 1 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Lftd Partners Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-25.
Lftd Partners Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 457 | Enlivex Therapeutics Ltd | 2 | -49.22 % |
| 458 | Avenue Therapeutics Inc | 2 | - |
| 459 | Geovax Labs Inc | 2 | -97.78 % |
| 460 | Vaccinex Inc | 2 | 36.36 % |
| 461 | Genprex Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 462 | Lftd Partners Inc | 1 | - |
| 463 | Decoy Therapeutics Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 464 | Hepion Pharmaceuticals Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 465 | Protagenic Therapeutics Inc new | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 466 | Jupiter Neurosciences Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 467 | Bioadaptives Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Lftd Partners Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Lftd Partners Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Major Pharmaceutical Preparations industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (341 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 17.27 % | 64.89 % (avg) | -47.6 pp |
| Operating Margin | -13.42 % | industry median | +40.3 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -83.39 % | -7.21 % (avg) | -76.2 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.50 % | 4.92 % (avg) | -4.4 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Lftd Partners Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Major Pharmaceutical Preparations industry average (341 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 25.1x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 17.3x | - |
| P/B | 0.2x | 4.5x | -4.3x |
| Return on Equity | -181.99 % | industry aggregate | -199.24 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -13.72 % | -2.95 % (avg) | -10.77 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Lftd Partners Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | - | - | 492.35 % | 81.37 % | -10.11 % | -27.68 % | -1.08 % |
| Operating Margin | - | - | -28.41 % | 24.58 % | 17.09 % | 4.67 % | -2.07 % | 2.47 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 18.77 % | -11.74 % | -3.26 % | 14.49 % | 14.44 % | 3.11 % | -0.98 % | 1.41 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | 6.4x | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Lftd Partners Inc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Lftd Partners Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Lftd Partners Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Lftd Partners Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Lftd Partners Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) — a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Lftd Partners Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 8.0% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Lftd Partners Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 827 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.50 % vs industry average 4.92 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Lftd Partners Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Lftd Partners Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Lftd Partners Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Lftd Partners Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Lftd Partners Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) — not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 40.3 points above the industry median.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 199.2 points below the industry aggregate.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (42.90 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Lftd Partners Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lftd Partners Inc | 0.23 | 2.75 | 0.06 |
| National Beverage Corp | 2.38 | 3.66 | - |
| Cronos Group Inc | 15.24 | 19.71 | - |
| Tilray Brands Inc | 0.83 | 2.49 | 0.22 |
| Canopy Growth Corporation | 2.02 | 3.43 | 0.42 |
| Sndl Inc | 2.74 | 4.88 | 40.21 |
Sign in to see all peers for Lftd Partners Inc .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Lftd Partners Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lftd Partners Inc | Q2 2026 | -15.7 % | - |
| National Beverage Corp | Q1 2026 | -5.3 % | -9.9 % |
| Cronos Group Inc | Q2 2026 | +269.5 % | - |
| Tilray Brands Inc | Q2 2026 | +24.9 % | - |
| Canopy Growth Corporation | Q2 2026 | +409.8 % | - |
| Sndl Inc | Q4 2025 | +2.8 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +37.0 % | - |
Sign in to see all peers for Lftd Partners Inc .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Lftd Partners Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lftd Partners Inc | Q2 2026 | +13.8 % | +160.9 % |
| National Beverage Corp | Q1 2026 | -3.1 % | - |
| Cronos Group Inc | Q2 2026 | +66.5 % | -80.8 % |
| Tilray Brands Inc | Q2 2026 | +21.0 % | - |
| Canopy Growth Corporation | Q2 2026 | +256.1 % | -53.1 % |
| Sndl Inc | Q4 2025 | +1.1 % | +48.7 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Lftd Partners Inc .
Lftd Partners Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lftd Partners Inc | - | - | - |
| National Beverage Corp | 24.39% | 27.05% | 34.41% |
| Cronos Group Inc | 6.70% | 6.90% | 7.25% |
| Tilray Brands Inc | - | - | - |
| Canopy Growth Corporation | - | - | - |
| Sndl Inc | - | - | - |
Sign in to see all peers for Lftd Partners Inc .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Lftd Partners Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Lftd Partners Inc | - | 0.04 |
| National Beverage Corp | 14.97 | 2.33 |
| Cronos Group Inc | 16.24 | 4.93 |
| Tilray Brands Inc | - | 0.49 |
| Canopy Growth Corporation | - | 1.21 |
| Sndl Inc | - | 0.49 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | - | 1.23 |
Sign in to see all peers for Lftd Partners Inc .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.