Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Lgl Group Inc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Lgl Group Inc (LGL) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q2 2026
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
24.78 %
Q2 2026
Net Margin
-30.53 %
Q2 2026

Key Findings: Lgl Group Inc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 5M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is holding steady (+1.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Lgl Group Inc ranks #47 of 71 companies by market capitalization in the IT Infrastructure industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Lgl Group Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

LGL Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026

Lgl Group Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/LGL/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/LGL/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/LGL/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the IT Infrastructure industry grew revenue 21.0% year over year, combined, vs 24.8% for Lgl Group Inc. Lgl Group Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Lgl Group Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Lgl Group Inc No Yes Yes No
High-Confidence Competitors (3) 100% 100% 67% 0%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 40% 50% 40% 50%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 12.50 % (1 of 8) 75.00 % (6 of 8) 50.00 % (4 of 8) 12.50 % (1 of 8)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q2 2026

100%market share
  • Lgl Group Inc100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Lgl Group Inc and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Lgl Group Inc's full market share breakdown »

LGL Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

LGL Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Lgl Group Inc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
50%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(1 of 2)
37.5%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(3 of 8)
57.1%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(4 of 7)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Lgl Group Inc -4.00 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (2) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (8) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (7) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Lgl Group Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

LGL Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

LGL High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 3) Percent change over the selected range

LGL Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

LGL Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

LGL Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

LGL Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Lgl Group Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company operates in a competitive environment with multiple domestic and international manufacturers offering custom-designed products of comparable quality and performance. Its competitive strategy targets niche markets that demand precise specifications, custom configurations, and reliability. Product development is directed toward relatively new but established markets to reduce the need for pioneering and customer education. Signal distribution products, which account for approximately 40% of net sales, are undergoing upgrades to improve functionality and efficiency using advanced technology.

Lgl Group Inc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Dover Corporation Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Spectracom Corporation Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Microsemi Corporation Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
K&L Microwave Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Vectron International Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Brandywine Communications Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Rakon Limited Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Microchip Technology Incorporated Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Lgl Group Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.