Semileds's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Semileds (LEDS) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Semileds vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 26M vs 104,112M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+40.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+7.7%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Semileds generated -48.6% revenue growth year over year in Q3 2026, vs 20.1% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 16.8% net margin compares with 12.6% for the peer group.
- Scale: Semileds ranks #104 of 117 companies by market capitalization in the Semiconductors industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Semileds accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 0.1% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.22M compares with $0.46M for the peer group (0.5x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
LEDS Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026
Semileds reported revenue contraction of 48.59 % year on year in Q3 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 20.05 %.
With a net margin of 16.78 %, Semileds achieved higher profitability than its competitors (12.59 %).
Semileds generated 0.03 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 0.08 % a year earlier.
Semileds vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Semileds and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Semileds Corp | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (2) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Semileds's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Semiconductors industry grew revenue 10.5% year over year, combined, vs -48.6% for Semileds. Semileds's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Semileds's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semileds Corp | No | No | No | No |
| Competitors combined (25) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 66.70 % (4 of 6) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
LEDS Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
LEDS Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
LEDS Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
LEDS Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maxlinear Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Macom Technology Solutions Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Powell Industries Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Diodes Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | On Semiconductor Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Semileds's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Semileds's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
We believe that our advanced technology helps us to compete in the innovative, intensely competitive and rapidly changing market of LED design and manufacturing. To succeed, however, we must continue to manufacture products that meet the demanding requirements of high performance at low costs. We do not account for a significant percentage of the total market volume today, and we face significant competition from other more established providers of similar products as well as from new entrants into our markets.
We compete with many LED chip manufacturers and LED packaging manufacturers. With respect to our LED chips and LED components, we primarily compete with Cree, Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. or SVC, Everlight, LiteOn, LED Engin, Nichia Corporation, or Nichia, Philips (Lumileds), Osram-OS GmbH and Edison Opto Corporation, or Edison. We have a number of competitors that compete directly with us and are much larger than us, including, among others, Cree, Nichia, Philips (Lumileds) and Osram-OS GmbH. Several substantially larger companies, such as Philips (Lumileds) and Osram-OS GmbH, compete against us with a relatively small segment of their overall business. In addition, several large and well-capitalized semiconductor companies, such as Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., or Samsung, LG Innotek Co., Ltd., or LG Innotek, have entered into the LED chip and UV market. These potential competitors have extensive experience in developing semiconductor chips, which is similar to the manufacturing process for LED chips and LED packaging. We are also aware of a number of well-funded private companies that are developing competing products. We will also compete with numerous smaller companies entering the market, some of whom may receive significant government incentives and subsidies pursuant to government programs designed to encourage the use of LED lighting and to establish LED-sector companies.
Some of our existing and potential competitors possess significant advantages, including longer operating histories, greater financial, technical, managerial, marketing, distribution and other resources, more long-standing and established relationships with our existing and potential customers, greater name recognition, larger customer bases and greater government incentives and support.
We believe that the key competitive factors in our markets are:
consistently producing high-quality LED chips with high efficacy;
balancing lumen output generation with providing low lumen cost;
providing a low total cost of ownership (i.e., cost, efficacy and lifespan) for end-customers;
producing UVA LED for niche markets where customers value quality and performance more than cost; and
our sales channels.
Competition in the markets for LED products is intense, and we expect that competition will continue to increase, thereby creating a highly aggressive pricing environment. Some of our competitors have in the past reduced their average selling prices, and the resulting competitive pricing pressures have caused us to similarly reduce our prices, accelerating the decline in the gross margin of our products. When prices decline, we must also write down the value of our inventory.
In the lighting market, we face competition from fixtures and bulbs manufactured and marketed by other LED lighting fixture companies and from lighting products incorporating incandescent, fluorescent, halogen, ceramic metal halide or other lighting technology. In addition to lighting companies such as Cree, Philips (Lumileds) and Osram-OS GmbH, which are substantially larger and more established than us, we are also competing with numerous smaller companies that have traditionally been in the lighting industry and industrial LED industry or recently entered into the LED lighting market and industrial LED market.
Publicly Traded Peers of Semileds Corp
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Semileds Corp | 18.68 | 25.93 |
| General Electric Company | 333,197.28 | 50,638.00 |
| Eaton Corporation Plc | 168,034.20 | 30,025.00 |
| Monolithic Power Systems Inc | 66,560.11 | 3,273.20 |
| Nxp Semiconductors N v | 59,913.03 | 12,615.00 |
| On Semiconductor Corporation | 30,592.86 | 6,198.80 |
| SUBTOTAL | 791,529.29 | 128,020.35 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Semileds Corp.
Sources: Semileds Corp's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Semileds Corp versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Semileds's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Cree | Named by the company | 85% |
| LG Innotek | Named by the company | 85% |
| Samsung | Named by the company | 85% |
| Everlight | Named by the company | 85% |
| Osram-OS GmbH | Named by the company | 85% |
| SVC | Named by the company | 85% |
| Edison | Named by the company | 85% |
| LiteOn | Named by the company | 85% |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| LED Engin | Named by the company | 85% |
| Philips (Lumileds) | Named by the company | 85% |
| Edison Opto Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Nichia | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Semileds's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Semileds's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| General Electric Company | Commercial Engines and Services, Reportable 72.90 % |
| Eaton Corporation Plc | Electrical Americas 46.31 % |
| On Semiconductor Corporation | Automative 52.69 % |
| Hubbell Inc | Utility Solutions 63.03 % |
| Macom Technology Solutions Holdings Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Semileds's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semileds Corp | 19 | 219,763 | -8,610 |
| General Electric Company | 333,197 | 888,386 | 157,579 |
| Eaton Corporation Plc | 168,034 | 308,572 | 39,403 |
| Monolithic Power Systems Inc | 66,560 | 727,217 | 178,736 |
| Nxp Semiconductors N v | 59,913 | 392,148 | 84,056 |
| On Semiconductor Corporation | 30,593 | 273,436 | 27,865 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 791,511 | 456,780 | 61,954 |
Semileds's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Monolithic Power Systems Inc | CN 51.13 % |
| On Semiconductor Corporation | United Kingdom 25.92 % |
| Macom Technology Solutions Holdings Inc | United States 39.45 % |
| Skyworks Solutions Inc | United States 75.41 % |
| Qorvo Inc | United States 51.94 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Semileds's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 109 companies in Semileds's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Semileds ranks #104 of 109 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 2,389, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nvidia Corp | 5,648,317 | 44.54 % |
| 2 | Broadcom Inc | 1,783,853 | 14.07 % |
| 3 | Micron Technology Inc | 1,220,833 | 9.63 % |
| 4 | Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 1,024,665 | 8.08 % |
| 5 | Intel Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Applied Materials Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Arm Holdings Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Marvell Technology Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Analog Devices Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 104 | Semileds Corp | 19 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Semileds's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Semileds's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 99 | Ftc Solar Inc | 42 | -65.24 % |
| 100 | Ascent Solar Technologies Inc | 28 | 44.94 % |
| 101 | Beam Global | 26 | -55.66 % |
| 102 | Sequans Communications S a | 24 | -69.50 % |
| 103 | Key Tronic Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 104 | Semileds Corp | 19 | 2.21 % |
| 105 | Mobix Labs Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 106 | Peraso Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 107 | Sono Group N v | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 108 | Smartkem Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 109 | Metalink Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Semileds's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Semileds's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Semiconductors industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (151 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 10.46 % | 34.40 % (avg) | -23.9 pp |
| Operating Margin | -5.98 % | industry median | -8.8 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 2.11 % | 7.07 % (avg) | -5.0 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | - | 9.39 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Semileds's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Semiconductors industry average (151 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 43.3x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | 26.2x | 22.7x | +3.4x |
| P/B | 6.5x | 6.6x | 0.0x |
| Return on Equity | -40.07 % | industry aggregate | -86.90 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -24.58 % | -0.16 % (avg) | -24.42 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Semileds's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -24.09 % | 0.45 % | -19.54 % | 4.92 % | 32.84 % | -18.50 % | -19.21 % | 500.00 % |
| Operating Margin | -59.27 % | -49.31 % | -47.86 % | -71.59 % | -39.50 % | -60.14 % | -55.03 % | -4.40 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -29.40 % | -30.93 % | -29.13 % | -38.52 % | -27.04 % | -58.65 % | -36.51 % | -24.07 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Semileds's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Semileds's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Semileds is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Semileds's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Semileds's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Semileds falls in the Question Mark quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 10.3% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Nvidia Corp alone holds 45% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
Semileds's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Moderate | Industry HHI of 2,389 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Semileds's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Semileds's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Semileds's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Semileds falls in the Medium attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Semileds's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+40.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 8.8 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 86.9 points below the industry aggregate.
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 10.3% median pace.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Nvidia Corp, holding 44.54 % of industry market cap.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Semileds's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semileds Corp | 0.30 | 0.98 | 0.61 |
| General Electric Company | - | 0.86 | 1.09 |
| Eaton Corporation Plc | 0.05 | 1.25 | 0.79 |
| Monolithic Power Systems Inc | 2.67 | 5.07 | - |
| Nxp Semiconductors N v | 0.88 | 2.08 | 2.36 |
| On Semiconductor Corporation | 1.75 | 4.36 | 0.73 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Semileds's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semileds Corp | Q2 2026 | -48.6 % | +583.0 % |
| General Electric Company | Q2 2026 | +21.1 % | +16.6 % |
| Eaton Corporation Plc | Q2 2026 | +21.4 % | -16.2 % |
| Monolithic Power Systems Inc | Q2 2026 | +47.7 % | +92.4 % |
| Nxp Semiconductors N v | Q1 2026 | +12.2 % | +128.0 % |
| On Semiconductor Corporation | Q2 2026 | +9.2 % | +32.5 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +18.0 % | +14.4 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Semileds's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semileds Corp | Q2 2026 | -60.4 % | -72.2 % |
| General Electric Company | Q2 2026 | +540.9 % | +2.4 % |
| Eaton Corporation Plc | Q2 2026 | +28.1 % | +25.2 % |
| Monolithic Power Systems Inc | Q2 2026 | +47.5 % | +71.2 % |
| Nxp Semiconductors N v | Q1 2026 | +9.3 % | +68.0 % |
| On Semiconductor Corporation | Q2 2026 | +7.8 % | -56.1 % |
Semileds's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semileds Corp | - | - | - |
| General Electric Company | 6.98% | 11.25% | 48.50% |
| Eaton Corporation Plc | 7.94% | 10.71% | 19.56% |
| Monolithic Power Systems Inc | 18.46% | 20.46% | 22.22% |
| Nxp Semiconductors N v | 10.27% | 7.92% | 26.40% |
| On Semiconductor Corporation | 4.95% | 4.73% | 8.37% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Semileds's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Semileds Corp | - | 0.72 |
| General Electric Company | 37.57 | 6.58 |
| Eaton Corporation Plc | 43.98 | 5.60 |
| Monolithic Power Systems Inc | 96.38 | 20.33 |
| Nxp Semiconductors N v | 22.61 | 4.75 |
| On Semiconductor Corporation | 48.81 | 4.94 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 45.60 | 6.18 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.