Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Leddartech Holdings Inc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Leddartech Holdings Inc (LDTC) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2024
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-93.58 %
Q4 2024
Net Margin
-34,656.11 %
Q4 2024

Key Findings: Leddartech Holdings Inc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 0M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+316.8% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Peer revenue share: Leddartech Holdings Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

LDTC Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2024

Leddartech Holdings Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/LDTC/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/LDTC/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/LDTC/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Software & Programming industry grew revenue 16.5% year over year, combined, vs -93.6% for Leddartech Holdings Inc. Leddartech Holdings Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Leddartech Holdings Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Leddartech Holdings Inc - - - -
High-Confidence Competitors (4) 75% 75% 25% 33%

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q4 2024

100%market share
  • Leddartech Holdings Inc100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Leddartech Holdings Inc and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Leddartech Holdings Inc's full market share breakdown »

LDTC Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

LDTC Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Leddartech Holdings Inc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
25%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(1 of 4)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Leddartech Holdings Inc -92.70 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (4) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Leddartech Holdings Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

LDTC Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

LDTC High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 4) Percent change over the selected range

Leddartech Holdings Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

LeddarTech operates in the automotive advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) and sensor fusion perception software market. The market includes two primary types of perception solutions: vision-based joint hardware solutions with object-level fusion, represented by companies such as Mobileye, Qualcomm, and Nvidia; and vision-based software solutions with object-level fusion on a single modality, including BaseLabs, Aptiv, AutoBrains, Phantom Ai, StradVision, and Helm Ai. Object-level fusion solutions typically rely on proprietary sensor and processor hardware. Many competitors in low-level fusion software focus on vision-centric systems. LeddarTech offers an AI-based low-level fusion solution that is hardware independent, aiming to deliver higher performance, reduced system costs, and accelerated development cycles. The company collaborates with recognized suppliers and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) to support its competitive position relative to these competitors.

Leddartech Holdings Inc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
AutoBrains Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Nvidia Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Helm Ai Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
StradVision Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
BaseLabs Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Phantom Ai Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Aptiv Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Mobileye Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
CARIAD Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Qualcomm Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Leddartech Holdings Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Get the full CSIMarket dataset: Subscribe API License