Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Lanvin Group Holdings Limited (LANV) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Lanvin Group Holdings Limited vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 269M vs 9,929M combined for its competitors (2.6% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+16.6%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Lanvin Group Holdings Limited generated -26.8% revenue growth year over year in Q4 2025, vs 12.1% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -109.5% net margin compares with 15.9% for the peer group.
- Scale: Lanvin Group Holdings Limited ranks #37 of 51 companies by market capitalization in the Apparel, Footwear & Accessories industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Lanvin Group Holdings Limited accounted for 8.5% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 12.5% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.36M compares with $0.40M for the peer group (0.9x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
LANV Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited reported revenue contraction of 26.81 % year on year in Q4 2025, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 12.07 %.
With a net margin of -109.50 %, Lanvin Group Holdings Limited reported lower profitability than its competitors (15.92 %).
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited generated 8.52 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 12.47 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Lanvin Group Holdings Limited reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Lanvin Group Holdings Limited and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Lanvin Group Holdings Limited | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Apparel, Footwear & Accessories industry grew revenue 8.3% year over year, combined, vs -26.8% for Lanvin Group Holdings Limited. Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.53% to 0.36%, a loss of 0.17 percentage points.
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lanvin Group Holdings Limited | - | No | No | Yes |
| Competitors combined (2) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
LANV Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
LANV Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ralph Lauren Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Moelis and Co | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Publicly Traded Peers of Lanvin Group Holdings Limited
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Lanvin Group Holdings Limited |
- | 269.36 |
 Ralph Lauren Corporation |
23,083.13 | 8,355.20 |
 Moelis and Co |
- | 1,573.99 |
| SUBTOTAL | 23,083.13 | 10,198.55 |
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Lanvin Group Holdings Limited versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Lanvin Group Holdings Limited reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Moelis and Co | Company report | 85% |
| Ralph Lauren Corporation | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Ralph Lauren Corporation | North America 40.38 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lanvin Group Holdings Limited | - | 359,144 | -393,262 |
| Ralph Lauren Corporation | 23,083 | 357,060 | 42,004 |
| Moelis and Co | - | 1,111,578 | 181,150 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 23,083 | 400,113 | 49,944 |
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Ralph Lauren Corporation | Americas 42.46 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 46 companies in Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Lanvin Group Holdings Limited ranks #37 of 46 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.03 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,307, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cintas Corporation | 90,322 | 27.72 % |
| 2 | Nike Inc | 57,152 | 17.54 % |
| 3 | Tapestry Inc | 27,915 | 8.57 % |
| 4 | Ralph Lauren Corporation | 23,083 | 7.09 % |
| 5 | Amer Sports Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Lululemon Athletica Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Deckers Outdoor Corp | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | On Holding Ag | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Levi Strauss and Co | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | V F Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 37 | Lanvin Group Holdings Limited | 83 | 0.03 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-11-06.
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32 | Rocky Brands Inc | 390 | 76.58 % |
| 33 | J jill Inc | 335 | 49.98 % |
| 34 | Superior Group Of Companies Inc | 200 | 39.02 % |
| 35 | Vera Bradley Inc | 198 | 189.39 % |
| 36 | Unifi Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 37 | Lanvin Group Holdings Limited | 83 | -64.45 % |
| 38 | Jerash Holdings Us Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 39 | Culp Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 40 | Crown Crafts Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 41 | Tandy Leather Factory Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 42 | Allbirds Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-11-06. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Apparel, Footwear & Accessories industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (69 companies). See the full Apparel, Footwear & Accessories industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 58.16 % | 37.62 % (avg) | +20.5 pp |
| Operating Margin | -96.32 % | industry median | -100.0 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | - | 0.77 % (avg) | - |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.00 % | 2.99 % (avg) | -3.0 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 3.62 % | -22.87 % | -24.24 % |
| Operating Margin | -28.72 % | -47.59 % | -96.32 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -13.54 % | -31.58 % | - |
| P/E | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
See Methodology: BCG Growth-Share Matrix for how relative share and growth are calculated and thresholded.
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 6.4% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 1,307 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 2.99 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 100.0 points below the industry median.
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lanvin Group Holdings Limited | 0.05 | 0.27 | - |
| Ralph Lauren Corporation | 0.93 | 1.99 | 0.46 |
| Moelis and Co | 0.49 | 0.61 | - |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lanvin Group Holdings Limited | Q4 2025 | -24.2 % | - |
| Ralph Lauren Corporation | Q2 2026 | +14.0 % | +19.0 % |
| Moelis and Co | Q2 2026 | +12.0 % | +17.9 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +8.1 % | -64.1 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lanvin Group Holdings Limited | Q4 2025 | -28.6 % | - |
| Ralph Lauren Corporation | Q2 2026 | +8.1 % | -71.5 % |
| Moelis and Co | Q2 2026 | - | +187.6 % |
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lanvin Group Holdings Limited | - | - | - |
| Ralph Lauren Corporation | 13.20% | 14.27% | 36.63% |
| Moelis and Co | 17.23% | 18.88% | 40.04% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Lanvin Group Holdings Limited | - | - |
| Ralph Lauren Corporation | 23.76 | 2.76 |
| Moelis and Co | 20.77 | - |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 24.44 | 2.26 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.