Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Kuber Resources's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Kuber Resources (KUBR) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q3 2025
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-76.35 %
Q3 2025
Net Margin
1.25 %
Q3 2025

Key Findings: Kuber Resources vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 12M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-74.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Kuber Resources ranks #40 of 45 companies by market capitalization in the Broadcasting Media & Cable TV industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Kuber Resources accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

KUBR Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2025

Kuber Resources generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/KUBR/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/KUBR/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/KUBR/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Broadcasting Media & Cable TV industry grew revenue 4.4% year over year, combined, vs -76.4% for Kuber Resources. Kuber Resources's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Kuber Resources's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Kuber Resources Corporation Yes Yes Yes Yes
Similar-Size Competitors (7) 0% 25% 25% 71%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 75.00 % (6 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 25.00 % (2 of 8)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q3 2025

100%market share
  • Kuber Resources100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Kuber Resources and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Kuber Resources's full market share breakdown »

KUBR Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

KUBR Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Kuber Resources's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
50%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(1 of 2)
66.7%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(4 of 6)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Kuber Resources Corporation - -
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (2) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (6) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Kuber Resources's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

KUBR Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

KUBR Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 7) Percent change over the selected range

KUBR Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

KUBR Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Kuber Resources's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The Company operates in a competitive environment across multiple industries. In the wood treatment sector within the greater China area, it faces competition from other wood treatment companies and potential risks related to patent licensing. In the tea industry in Hunan province, competitors include Urban Tea Inc., Maiji (麦吉), Luosennina (罗森尼娜), NAYUKI (奈雪的茶), and Chayanyuese (茶颜悦色). In precious commodities trading in Hong Kong, the Company competes with established firms such as Chow Tai Fook and Luk Fook, which have extensive experience in the global production and distribution of precious jewelry and metals. Additionally, numerous multinational banks, financial institutions, specialized traders, and dealers in Hong Kong represent further competition.

Kuber Resources's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Maiji Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Luk Fook Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Chayanyuese Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
NAYUKI Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Luosennina Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Chow Tai Fook Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Urban Tea Inc. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Kuber Resources's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Get the full CSIMarket dataset: Subscribe API License