Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Nauticus Robotics Inc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Nauticus Robotics Inc (KITT) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q2 2026
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-57.32 %
Q2 2026
Net Margin
-1,254.70 %
Q2 2026

Key Findings: Nauticus Robotics Inc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 4M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-13.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Nauticus Robotics Inc ranks #122 of 143 companies by market capitalization in the Industrial Machinery and Components industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Nauticus Robotics Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

KITT Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026

Nauticus Robotics Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/KITT/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/KITT/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/KITT/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Industrial Machinery and Components industry grew revenue 12.4% year over year, combined, vs -57.3% for Nauticus Robotics Inc. Nauticus Robotics Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Nauticus Robotics Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Nauticus Robotics Inc No Yes Yes No
Similar-Size Competitors (9) 0% 40% 40% 75%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 0.00 % (0 of 8) 50.00 % (4 of 8) 50.00 % (4 of 8) 28.60 % (2 of 7)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q2 2026

100%market share
  • Nauticus Robotics Inc100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Nauticus Robotics Inc and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Nauticus Robotics Inc's full market share breakdown »

KITT Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

KITT Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Nauticus Robotics Inc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
33.3%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(2 of 6)
20%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(1 of 5)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Nauticus Robotics Inc -93.00 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (6) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (5) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Nauticus Robotics Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

KITT Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

KITT Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

KITT Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

KITT Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Nauticus Robotics Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

Nauticus Robotics operates in a competitive market as a new entrant. Its primary competitors in vehicles and services include established ROV manufacturers and ROV service companies, ranging from large multinational manufacturers and service providers to smaller local service providers. Competitors to Nauticus's ToolKITT subsea autonomy software include ROV manufacturers offering proprietary software operating systems and independent software suppliers providing solutions to enhance ROV and robotic system capabilities. Additionally, companies specializing in data processing for ROV operation data and those focusing on subsea manipulators and robotic arms for ROVs and underwater applications also compete with Nauticus.

Nauticus Robotics Inc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
SMD Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
SAAB Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Ocean Infinity Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Fugro Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
SeeByte Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Reach Subsea Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Greensea IQ Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Nauticus Robotics Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Get the full CSIMarket dataset: Subscribe API License