Karooooo Ltd's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Karooooo Ltd (KARO) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Karooooo Ltd vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 383M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Scale: Karooooo Ltd ranks #97 of 259 companies by market capitalization in the Software & Programming industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Karooooo Ltd accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
KARO Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2026
Karooooo Ltd generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Software & Programming industry grew revenue 16.4% year over year, combined, vs 20.0% for Karooooo Ltd. Karooooo Ltd's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.12% to 0.12%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Karooooo Ltd's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karooooo Ltd | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| High-Confidence Competitors (4) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 14.30 % (1 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
KARO Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
KARO Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
KARO Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
KARO Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
Karooooo Ltd's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Karooooo Ltd's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Netstar | Named by the company | 85% |
| Verizon Connect | Named by the company | 85% |
| Fleet Complete | Named by the company | 85% |
| Michelin | Named by the company | 85% |
| Tracker | Named by the company | 85% |
| Bridgestone | Named by the company | 85% |
| Inseego | Named by the company | 85% |
| Power Fleet | Named by the company | 85% |
| WebFleet by Bridgestone | Named by the company | 85% |
| Geotab | Named by the company | 85% |
| MiX Telematics | Named by the company | 85% |
| Verizon | Named by the company | 85% |
| CTrack | Named by the company | 85% |
| Masternaut | Named by the company | 85% |
| TomTom | Named by the company | 85% |
| Fleetmatics | Named by the company | 85% |
| Powerfleet Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Geotab Europe | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Karooooo Ltd's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.