Jbt Marel's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Jbt Marel (JBTM) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Jbt Marel vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 3,779M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+3.8% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Scale: Jbt Marel ranks #30 of 143 companies by market capitalization in the Industrial Machinery and Components industry, holding 0.3% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Jbt Marel accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
JBTM Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Jbt Marel generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Industrial Machinery and Components industry grew revenue 13.8% year over year, combined, vs 4.9% for Jbt Marel. Jbt Marel's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.76% to 0.70%, a loss of 0.06 percentage points.
Jbt Marel's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jbt Marel Corporation | Yes | Yes | Yes | - |
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 14.30 % (1 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
JBTM Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
JBTM Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
JBTM Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
JBTM Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
Jbt Marel's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Jbt Marel's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Atlas Pacific Engineering Company, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| METALQUIMIA, S.A. | Named by the company | 85% |
| MYCOM | Named by the company | 85% |
| Starfrost | Named by the company | 85% |
| Advanced Equipment Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Nexentis Technologies Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Barry-Wehmiller Companies, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Duravant LLC | Named by the company | 85% |
| Fortifi Food Processing Solutions | Named by the company | 85% |
| Krones | Named by the company | 85% |
| Middleby Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Provisur Technologies, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Steriflow SAS. | Named by the company | 85% |
| CFT S.p.A. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Ferrum | Named by the company | 85% |
| Heinen Freezing GmbH & Co. KG | Named by the company | 85% |
| Mettler-Toledo International, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Nantong Freezing Equipment Company, Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Statco Engineering | Named by the company | 85% |
| Alit SRL | Named by the company | 85% |
| Brown International Corp. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Egemin Automation Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| FPS Process Foods Solutions | Named by the company | 85% |
| Marel hf. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Morris & Associates, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Shibuya Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| NITO | Named by the company | 85% |
| Baader GmbH & Co. KG | Named by the company | 85% |
| DSI Dantech A/S | Named by the company | 85% |
| Food Processing Equipment Company | Named by the company | 85% |
| Jarvis Products Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Meyn Food Processing Technology B.V. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Poly-clip system GmbH & Co. KG | Named by the company | 85% |
| Steriflow SA | Named by the company | 85% |
| Allpax Products, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Bühler Group | Named by the company | 85% |
| Elettric 80 S.p.a. Italia | Named by the company | 85% |
| GEA Group AG | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Jbt Marel's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Jbt Marel's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Jbt Marel Corporation | Prepared Food and Beverage Solutions 50.85 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).