Innovative Designs Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Innovative Designs Inc (IVDN) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Innovative Designs Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 3M vs 120,266M combined for its competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is holding steady (+0.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-10.2%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Innovative Designs Inc generated 23.8% revenue growth year over year in Q3 2026, vs 0.4% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 7.4% net margin compares with 8.4% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Innovative Designs Inc accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $1.51M compares with $0.43M for the peer group (3.5x).
- Structure: Innovative Designs Inc operates in the following segments: Housewrap, Apparel.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
IVDN Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026
Innovative Designs Inc reported revenue growth of 23.77 % year on year in Q3 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 0.35 %.
With a net margin of 7.39 %, Innovative Designs Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (8.42 %).
Innovative Designs Inc generated 0.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.00 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Innovative Designs Inc vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Innovative Designs Inc reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Innovative Designs Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Innovative Designs Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Innovative Designs Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Apparel, Footwear & Accessories industry grew revenue 8.3% year over year, combined, vs 23.8% for Innovative Designs Inc. Innovative Designs Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Innovative Designs Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Innovative Designs Inc | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (26) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
IVDN Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
IVDN Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fossil Group inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Vera Bradley Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Movado Group Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | V F Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Ermenegildo Zegna N v | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Innovative Designs Inc's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Innovative Designs Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Many companies offer a type of house wrap some with insulating properties. These companies have large operations and are well financed. Some of the larger companies are DuPont, Owens-Corning and Kimberly Clark. The Company expects to face intense competition with others who have much greater resources in the building construction supply industry.
The markets served by the Company are highly competitive. Competitive pricing
pressure could result in loss of customers or decreased profit margins. Competition
by product type includes the following:
The markets for our products are increasingly competitive. Our competitors have
substantially longer operating histories, greater brand name and company name
recognition, larger customer bases and greater financial, operating, and technical
resources than us. Because we are financially and operationally smaller than
our competitors, we will encounter difficulties in capturing market share. Our
competitors are able to conduct extensive marketing campaigns and create more
attractive pricing of their target markets than we are.
Some of our biggest competitors in the Arctic Armor™ line are:
· Ice Clam Corporation
· Vexilar
· Mustang Survival
· Frabill
· Stryker
We compete in the following ways:
A. Emphasize the Advantages of our Products.
Arctic Armor Line
We emphasize the following characteristics and advantages of our Arctic Armor
line products:
· light weight
· waterproof
· windproof
· sub-zero protection
· buoyancy
INSULTEX provides a scent barrier which we had a permeation test performed on
at the Texas Research Institute Austin, Inc. The product was subjected to gas
stimulant for an eight-hour period. The product was tested for permeation of
the gas every three minutes for the duration of the test with almost no detection
of the gas throughout the test. The testing was based upon accepted industry
practices as well as the test method used.
Publicly Traded Peers of Innovative Designs Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Innovative Designs Inc |
7.70 | 3.01 |
 Nike Inc |
59,189.90 | 45,891.00 |
 Tapestry Inc |
27,826.32 | 8,193.50 |
 Ralph Lauren Corporation |
24,429.28 | 8,355.20 |
 Amer Sports Inc |
18,277.44 | 6,565.30 |
 Lululemon Athletica Inc |
12,706.78 | 11,093.25 |
| SUBTOTAL | 209,638.40 | 150,183.99 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Innovative Designs Inc .
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Innovative Designs Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Innovative Designs Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Innovative Designs Inc reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Kimberly Clark. The Company | Company report | 85% |
| Ice Clam Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Pixelworks Inc | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Innovative Designs Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Innovative Designs Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Innovative Designs Inc | Housewrap 99.73 % |
| Nike Inc | North America 45.72 % |
| Tapestry Inc | Coach 88.57 % |
| Ralph Lauren Corporation | North America 40.38 % |
| Lululemon Athletica Inc | Americas 71.41 % |
| Deckers Outdoor Corp | UGG Brand 53.11 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Innovative Designs Inc .
Innovative Designs Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Innovative Designs Inc | 8 | 1,505,671 | 257,802 |
| Nike Inc | 59,190 | 628,644 | 42,370 |
| Tapestry Inc | 27,826 | 397,743 | 78,296 |
| Ralph Lauren Corporation | 24,429 | 357,060 | 42,004 |
| Amer Sports Inc | 18,277 | 426,318 | 28,597 |
| Lululemon Athletica Inc | 12,707 | 284,442 | 36,358 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 209,631 | 428,615 | 35,903 |
Sign in to see all peers for Innovative Designs Inc .
Innovative Designs Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Tapestry Inc | North America 57.37 % |
| Ralph Lauren Corporation | Americas 42.46 % |
| Lululemon Athletica Inc | Americas 71.41 % |
| Deckers Outdoor Corp | United States 56.45 % |
| Skechers Usa Inc | Americas 45.63 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Sign in to see all peers for Innovative Designs Inc .
Innovative Designs Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 46 companies in Innovative Designs Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Innovative Designs Inc ranks #0 of 46 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,279, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cintas Corporation | 90,647 | 27.08 % |
| 2 | Nike Inc | 59,062 | 17.64 % |
| 3 | Tapestry Inc | 28,602 | 8.54 % |
| 4 | Ralph Lauren Corporation | 24,429 | 7.30 % |
| 5 | Amer Sports Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Lululemon Athletica Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Deckers Outdoor Corp | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | On Holding Ag | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Levi Strauss and Co | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | V F Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Innovative Designs Inc | 8 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Innovative Designs Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-11-06.
Innovative Designs Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Apparel, Footwear & Accessories industry average (69 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Apparel, Footwear & Accessories industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 9.0x | 17.1x | -8.1x |
| EV / EBITDA | 29.5x | 10.4x | +19.1x |
| P/B | 5.3x | 2.7x | +2.6x |
| Return on Equity | 0.22 % | industry aggregate | -26.27 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | 3.01 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Innovative Designs Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2020 | 2021 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | -42.04 % | - | -10.53 % | 28.33 % | 27.62 % | 444.08 % | 53.35 % |
| Operating Margin | -103.58 % | -200.78 % | - | -99.31 % | -138.55 % | -81.49 % | 12.29 % | 22.00 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -14.38 % | -21.60 % | -27.72 % | -10.65 % | -17.85 % | -13.00 % | 15.00 % | 15.87 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6.4x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Innovative Designs Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 1,279 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 2.98 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Innovative Designs Inc's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Innovative Designs Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 26.3 points below the industry aggregate.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-10.2% annualized).
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Innovative Designs Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Innovative Designs Inc | 3.37 | 8.61 | - |
| Nike Inc | 0.63 | 2.09 | 0.55 |
| Tapestry Inc | 0.52 | 1.58 | 4.31 |
| Ralph Lauren Corporation | 0.93 | 1.99 | 0.46 |
| Amer Sports Inc | 0.30 | 1.50 | 0.05 |
| Lululemon Athletica Inc | 0.01 | 2.20 | - |
Sign in to see all peers for Innovative Designs Inc .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Innovative Designs Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Innovative Designs Inc | Q2 2026 | +23.8 % | -10.3 % |
| Nike Inc | Q3 2026 | -4.3 % | -2.1 % |
| Tapestry Inc | Q3 2026 | +11.1 % | +31.0 % |
| Ralph Lauren Corporation | Q2 2026 | +14.0 % | +19.0 % |
| Amer Sports Inc | Q4 2025 | +26.7 % | +461.7 % |
| Lululemon Athletica Inc | Q2 2026 | -4.3 % | -11.2 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +6.3 % | +3.1 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Innovative Designs Inc .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Innovative Designs Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Innovative Designs Inc | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| Nike Inc | Q3 2026 | -5.3 % | -3.9 % |
| Tapestry Inc | Q3 2026 | +0.5 % | +48.1 % |
| Ralph Lauren Corporation | Q2 2026 | +8.1 % | -71.5 % |
| Amer Sports Inc | Q4 2025 | +19.6 % | -5.5 % |
| Lululemon Athletica Inc | Q2 2026 | -9.0 % | -15.9 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Innovative Designs Inc .
Innovative Designs Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Innovative Designs Inc | 21.45% | 22.96% | 23.36% |
| Nike Inc | 8.26% | 13.37% | 21.56% |
| Tapestry Inc | 24.53% | 31.94% | 284.25% |
| Ralph Lauren Corporation | 13.20% | 14.27% | 36.63% |
| Amer Sports Inc | 4.38% | 3.89% | 7.57% |
| Lululemon Athletica Inc | 16.97% | 21.73% | 29.73% |
Sign in to see all peers for Innovative Designs Inc .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Innovative Designs Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Innovative Designs Inc | 5.88 | 2.56 |
| Nike Inc | 19.17 | 1.29 |
| Tapestry Inc | 17.58 | 3.40 |
| Ralph Lauren Corporation | 25.14 | 2.92 |
| Amer Sports Inc | 42.71 | 2.78 |
| Lululemon Athletica Inc | 9.28 | 1.15 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 16.66 | 1.40 |
Sign in to see all peers for Innovative Designs Inc .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.