Sentient Brands Holdings Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Sentient Brands Holdings Inc (INTB) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Sentient Brands Holdings Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 1M vs 9,214M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+44.6% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+5.2%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Sentient Brands Holdings Inc generated 320.6% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs -1.0% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 9.1% net margin compares with 7.2% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Sentient Brands Holdings Inc accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
INTB Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Sentient Brands Holdings Inc reported revenue growth of 320.62 % year on year in Q2 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue change of -0.97 %.
With a net margin of 9.10 %, Sentient Brands Holdings Inc achieved higher profitability than its competitors (7.20 %).
Sentient Brands Holdings Inc generated 0.02 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.00 % a year earlier.
Sentient Brands Holdings Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Sentient Brands Holdings Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Sentient Brands Holdings Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Sentient Brands Holdings Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Technology Retail industry grew revenue 11.2% year over year, combined, vs 320.6% for Sentient Brands Holdings Inc. Sentient Brands Holdings Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Sentient Brands Holdings Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sentient Brands Holdings Inc | No | - | - | Yes |
| Competitors combined (3) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (4) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
INTB Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
INTB Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Churchill Downs Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Brightstar Lottery Plc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Draftkings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Sentient Brands Holdings Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Sentient Brands Holdings Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Sentient Brands Holdings Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Sentient Brands Holdings Inc | - | 1.29 |
| Draftkings Inc | 10,497.24 | 6,222.52 |
| Churchill Downs Inc | 5,300.40 | 2,991.90 |
| Brightstar Lottery Plc | 1,944.39 | 2,511.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 17,742.03 | 11,726.71 |
Sources: Sentient Brands Holdings Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Sentient Brands Holdings Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Sentient Brands Holdings Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Charlotte’s Web | Named by the company | 85% |
| Green Growth Brands | Named by the company | 85% |
| Bluebird | Named by the company | 85% |
| Folium Biosciences | Named by the company | 85% |
| Pure Kana | Named by the company | 85% |
| Abacus | Named by the company | 85% |
| CV Sciences | Named by the company | 85% |
| Lord Jones | Named by the company | 85% |
| Bluebird Folium Biosciences | Named by the company | 85% |
| Global Cannabinoids | Named by the company | 85% |
| St. Jane | Named by the company | 85% |
| BeBoe | Named by the company | 85% |
| Elixinol | Named by the company | 85% |
| Mary’s | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Sentient Brands Holdings Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Sentient Brands Holdings Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Draftkings Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
| Churchill Downs Inc | Live and Historical Racing 58.67 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sentient Brands Holdings Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sentient Brands Holdings Inc | - | - | - |
| Draftkings Inc | 10,497 | 1,131,368 | -30,346 |
| Churchill Downs Inc | 5,300 | 332,433 | 46,189 |
| Brightstar Lottery Plc | 1,944 | 431,814 | 49,355 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 17,742 | 577,181 | 26,375 |
Sentient Brands Holdings Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Brightstar Lottery Plc | United States 46.83 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Sentient Brands Holdings Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 7 companies in Sentient Brands Holdings Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Sentient Brands Holdings Inc ranks #0 of 7 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 3,288, indicating a highly concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Td Synnex Corporation | 20,477 | 45.50 % |
| 2 | Gamestop Corp | 14,192 | 31.54 % |
| 3 | Ingram Micro Holding Corp | 6,145 | 13.65 % |
| 4 | Eplus Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 5 | Scansource Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Climb Global Solutions Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Crown Equity Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Sentient Brands Holdings Inc | 11 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Sentient Brands Holdings Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2021-02-09.
Sentient Brands Holdings Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Technology Retail industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (12 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 33.76 % | 10.53 % (avg) | +23.2 pp |
| Operating Margin | -13.97 % | industry median | -16.8 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -21.77 % | -4.57 % (avg) | -17.2 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.00 % | 0.56 % (avg) | -0.6 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Sentient Brands Holdings Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Operating Margin | - | - | -11,191.34 % | - | - | - | - | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | 60.50 % | 54.29 % | 129.11 % | 31.05 % | 21.47 % | 7.77 % | 20.73 % | 58.43 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Sentient Brands Holdings Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Low | Industry HHI of 3,288 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 0.56 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Sentient Brands Holdings Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Sentient Brands Holdings Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Sentient Brands Holdings Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Sentient Brands Holdings Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Sentient Brands Holdings Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Return on equity 6.2 points above the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+44.6% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 16.8 points below the industry median.
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 10.5% median pace.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Td Synnex Corporation, holding 45.50 % of industry market cap.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Sentient Brands Holdings Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sentient Brands Holdings Inc | 0.01 | 0.17 | - |
| Draftkings Inc | 0.65 | 1.04 | 3.62 |
| Churchill Downs Inc | 0.31 | 0.49 | 3.08 |
| Brightstar Lottery Plc | 0.49 | 0.76 | 4.77 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Sentient Brands Holdings Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sentient Brands Holdings Inc | Q2 2026 | +320.6 % | - |
| Draftkings Inc | Q2 2026 | -4.6 % | - |
| Churchill Downs Inc | Q2 2026 | +4.9 % | +11.2 % |
| Brightstar Lottery Plc | Q4 2025 | 0.0 % | -43.5 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | -0.5 % | -47.8 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Sentient Brands Holdings Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sentient Brands Holdings Inc | Q2 2026 | +6,369.3 % | - |
| Draftkings Inc | Q2 2026 | +4.4 % | +27.2 % |
| Churchill Downs Inc | Q2 2026 | +119.1 % | -31.5 % |
| Brightstar Lottery Plc | Q4 2025 | +12.6 % | +112.1 % |
Sentient Brands Holdings Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sentient Brands Holdings Inc | - | - | - |
| Draftkings Inc | - | - | - |
| Churchill Downs Inc | 5.55% | 5.80% | 37.10% |
| Brightstar Lottery Plc | 3.13% | 4.16% | 32.80% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Sentient Brands Holdings Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Sentient Brands Holdings Inc | - | - |
| Draftkings Inc | - | 1.69 |
| Churchill Downs Inc | 13.03 | 1.77 |
| Brightstar Lottery Plc | 13.34 | 0.77 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 33.14 | 1.51 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.