Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Cimg Inc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Cimg Inc (IMG) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q3 2026
Competitors Tracked
4
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
0.01 %
vs 0.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
3,426.15 %
Peers: 22.12 %
Net Margin
-483.39 %
Peers: 7.55 %

Key Findings: Cimg Inc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 31M vs 58,428M combined for tracked competitors (0.1% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-72.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+13.9%) for its tracked peer group.
  • Growth: Cimg Inc generated 3,426.2% revenue growth year over year in Q3 2026, vs 22.1% for its tracked competitors combined.
  • Profitability: Its -483.4% net margin compares with 7.6% for the peer group.
  • Peer revenue share: Cimg Inc accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
  • Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $2.38M compares with $0.23M for the peer group (10.5x).

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

IMG Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026

Cimg Inc reported revenue growth of 3,426.15 % year on year in Q3 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 22.12 %.

With a net margin of -483.39 %, Cimg Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (7.55 %).

Cimg Inc generated 0.01 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/IMG/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/IMG/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/IMG/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Cimg Inc vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026

Revenue growth, year on year

Cimg Inc +3,426.2 %
Competitors combined +22.1 %

Net margin

Cimg Inc -483.4 %
Competitors combined +7.6 %

Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months

Cimg Inc -72.0 %
Competitors combined +13.9 %

TTM net margin

Cimg Inc -152.5 %
Competitors combined +6.0 %

TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.

Competitor Financial Benchmarking - TTM Commercial

TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Cimg Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.

Entity TTM Revenue Latest Q ×4 Rev Run-rate vs TTM TTM Net Income TTM Net Margin
Cimg Inc $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitors combined $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
High-Confidence Competitors (1) $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitor Financial Benchmarking

TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Cimg Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

For context: the Specialty Retail industry grew revenue 16.5% year over year, combined, vs 3,426.2% for Cimg Inc. Cimg Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Cimg Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Cimg Inc No - - Yes
Competitors combined (4) 100% 75% 75% 0%
High-Confidence Competitors (2) 50% 100% 100% 0%

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q3 2026

0%market share
  • Cimg Inc0.0%
  • Competitors combined100.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Cimg Inc and its 4 tracked competitors.

See Cimg Inc's full market share breakdown »

IMG Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

IMG Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Cimg Inc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
50%beat U.S.A. 500
Competitors Combined
(2 of 4)
0%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(0 of 1)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Cimg Inc - -
Competitors combined (4) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Cimg Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

IMG Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

IMG High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 2) Percent change over the selected range

5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months

#CompetitorTTM Share Price Returnvs U.S.A. 500
1 Coca Cola Co 282.9% Outperformed
2 Keurig Dr Pepper Inc 282.9% Outperformed
3 Starbucks Corporation 282.9% Outperformed
4 National Beverage Corp 282.9% Outperformed
Best-Performing Competitor Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Cimg Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.

Cimg Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company operates in a competitive health industry market in Asia, where both local and international brands vie for consumer attention. International brands focus on quality, organic ingredients, and health benefits, particularly in Southeast Asia, while local competitors leverage established distribution networks and regional consumer insights. The market is fragmented, with many brands emphasizing organic or natural ingredients and wellness benefits. The company competes based on product quality, brand positioning, sustainability, and digital marketing and distribution capabilities. In the intelligent technology sector, competition has increased with the entry of traditional technology industries. The company emphasizes product quality, computing power technology capabilities, and stable supply within its Computing Power Product Series. It identifies its premium product quality, experienced management team, and effective digital marketing and customer engagement as key competitive strengths. Among competitors mentioned in filings is China Merchants Bank.

Publicly Traded Peers of Cimg Inc

Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees
Company Market Cap Revenues Income Employees
Cimg Inc 60.53 31.00 -47.26 13
Coca Cola Co 371,349.12 49,284.00 13,768.00 65,900
Starbucks Corporation 107,471.45 38,338.30 1,982.10 381,000
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc 41,398.93 20,090.00 1,495.00 30,600
National Beverage Corp 2,735.22 1,180.55 183.65 1,677
SUBTOTAL 523,015.25 108,923.85 17,381.49 479,190

Sources: Cimg Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Cimg Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.

Cimg Inc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Sunfood Superfoods Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
BulletProof Coffee Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Maca Team Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Organo Gold Herbal Coffee Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Green Mountain Wellness Coffee Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Navitas Organics Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Nomadar Corp Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
China Merchants Bank Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Maca-Root Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
South Beach Java Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Javita Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Nuvia Trim Coffee Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Sportradar Group Ag Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
FGO Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
NatureGift Instant Coffee Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
National Beverage Corp Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Regional Brands Inc. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Cimg Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Cimg Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).
Company Largest Segment 2nd Segment 3rd Segment
Coca Cola Co North America 40.11 % Europe, Middle East & Africa 24.00 % Latin America 12.66 %
Starbucks Corporation North America 79.32 % International 14.19 % Channel Development 6.31 %
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc U.S. Refreshment Beverages 40.02 % JDE Peet's 38.34 % U.S. Coffee 12.56 %

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).

Cimg Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison

Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $
CompanyMarket CapRevenue / EmployeeIncome / Employee
Cimg Inc 61 2,384,246 -3,635,185
Coca Cola Co 371,349 747,860 208,923
Starbucks Corporation 107,471 100,625 5,202
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc 41,399 656,536 48,856
National Beverage Corp 2,735 703,967 109,510
PEERS TOTAL 522,955 227,250 36,372

Cimg Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers

Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.
Company Largest Market 2nd Market 3rd Market
Coca Cola Co Non-US 60.63 % UNITED STATES 39.37 % -
Starbucks Corporation United States 79.18 % Non-US 20.09 % CHINA 0.74 %

Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.

Cimg Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure

Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 54 companies in Cimg Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.

Cimg Inc ranks #0 of 54 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,768, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).

Rank Company Market Cap Industry Share
1 Jd com Inc 38,932 33.49 %
2 Ulta Beauty Inc 24,052 20.69 %
3 Dick s Sporting Goods inc 12,068 10.38 %
4 Firstcash Holdings Inc 9,372 8.06 %
5 Yunji Inc 1,234 5.2%
6 Bath and Body Works Inc 1,234 5.2%
7 Academy Sports And Outdoors Inc 1,234 5.2%
8 Ezcorp Inc 1,234 5.2%
9 Rh 1,234 5.2%
10 Bobs Discount Furniture Inc 1,234 5.2%
0 Cimg Inc 7 0.00 %
Full Industry Market Structure

Market cap and industry share for the rest of Cimg Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-03-05.

Cimg Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure

Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Specialty Retail industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (82 companies). See the full Specialty Retail industry profitability benchmarks.
Metric Company Industry Difference
Gross Margin 0.67 % 41.36 % (avg) -40.7 pp
Operating Margin -19.36 % industry median -23.7 pp
EBITDA Margin -151.66 % 1.40 % (avg) -153.1 pp
Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) - 3.05 % (avg) -

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.

Cimg Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory

Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.
Metric 20182019202020212022202320242025
Revenue Growth -1.58 %43.37 %-30.78 %75.42 %31.08 %20.33 %-62.10 %-
Operating Margin -401.59 %-651.54 %-858.85 %-730.10 %-333.72 %-222.02 %--
Return on Invested Capital -124.06 %-147.85 %-92.63 %-71.37 %-54.05 %-83.72 %--9.89 %
P/E --------

Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.

Cimg Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)

Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.
Force Assessment Basis
Competitive Rivalry Moderate Industry HHI of 1,768 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above)
Supplier Power Not covered on this page See Cimg Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data
Buyer Power Not covered on this page See Cimg Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data
Threat of Substitutes - No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated

Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.

Cimg Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength

A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.

High Strength
Medium Strength
Low Strength
High Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Invest / Grow
Selective
Medium Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Selective
Harvest
Low Attractiveness
Selective
Harvest
Harvest / Divest Cimg Inc

Cimg Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.

Cimg Inc's SWOT

Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.

Strengths

No rule matched.

Weaknesses

  • Operating margin 23.7 points below the industry median.
  • Return on equity 705.9 points below the industry aggregate.
  • Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-72.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.

Opportunities

No rule matched.

Threats

No rule matched.

Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.

Cimg Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison

Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months
CompanyQuick RatioWorking CapitalDebt / EquityAsset Turnover
Cimg Inc 0.00 0.51 0.03 0.46
Coca Cola Co - 1.31 1.33 0.47
Starbucks Corporation - 0.79 - 1.25
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc 0.48 0.93 0.80 0.30
National Beverage Corp 2.38 3.66 - 1.57

Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Cimg Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers

Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodRevenue Y/YRevenue Q/QIncome Y/YIncome Q/Q
Cimg Inc Q2 2026+3,426.1 %-28.0 %--
Coca Cola CoQ1 2026+12.1 %+5.5 %+18.9 %+71.2 %
Starbucks CorporationQ2 2026-1.4 %-2.2 %+87.1 %+104.6 %
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc Q2 2026+75.6 %+83.8 %-61.6 %-22.2 %
National Beverage Corp Q1 2026-5.3 %+12.3 %-9.9 %-2.2 %
PEERS TOTAL+17.3 %+14.9 %+17.1 %+68.2 %

Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Cimg Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures

Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodCosts Y/YCosts Q/QCapex Y/YCapex Q/Q
Cimg Inc Q2 2026+3,745.8 %-32.2 %--
Coca Cola CoQ1 2026+11.0 %-2.2 %-13.9 %-69.8 %
Starbucks CorporationQ2 2026---48.6 %-
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc Q2 2026+122.4 %+124.6 %+69.4 %+55.1 %
National Beverage Corp Q1 2026-3.1 %+17.7 %--

Cimg Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers

ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover
CompanyROAROIROEReceivables TurnoverInventory Turnover
Cimg Inc ---82.743.03
Coca Cola Co13.13%17.45%41.27%13.303.96
Starbucks Corporation6.45%6.70%-29.79-
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc 2.21%2.34%5.47%11.274.40
National Beverage Corp 24.39%27.05%34.41%11.578.03

ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).

Cimg Inc's Valuation vs Peers

P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book
CompanyP/EPrice / SalesPEGP/CFPrice / Book
Cimg Inc -1.95--1.01
Coca Cola Co27.097.531.00170.2710.39
Starbucks Corporation54.122.80---
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc 30.692.06-32.121.42
National Beverage Corp 14.902.32-17.574.30
PEERS AVERAGE30.094.80180.179.02

P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.

Get the full CSIMarket dataset: Subscribe API License