Internet Gold Golden Lines Ltd's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Internet Gold Golden Lines Ltd (IGLD) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Internet Gold Golden Lines Ltd vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 2,598M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+1,335.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Peer revenue share: Internet Gold Golden Lines Ltd accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
IGLD Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2018
Internet Gold Golden Lines Ltd generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Communications Services industry grew revenue -4.9% year over year, combined, vs 230.2% for Internet Gold Golden Lines Ltd. Internet Gold Golden Lines Ltd's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.38% to 1.31%, a gain of 0.93 percentage points.
Internet Gold Golden Lines Ltd's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internet Gold Golden Lines Ltd | No | No | No | Yes |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 28.60 % (2 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.