Interactive Brokers Group Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Interactive Brokers Group Inc (IBKR) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Interactive Brokers Group Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 6,449M vs 460,222M combined for tracked competitors (1.4% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-8.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-9.1%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Interactive Brokers Group Inc generated 0.1% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs -2.3% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 90.3% net margin compares with 25.8% for the peer group.
- Scale: Interactive Brokers Group Inc ranks #15 of 91 companies by market capitalization in the Investment Services industry, holding 1.7% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Interactive Brokers Group Inc accounted for 1.4% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 1.4% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $1.98M compares with $1.04M for the peer group (1.9x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
IBKR Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Interactive Brokers Group Inc reported revenue growth of 0.14 % year on year in Q2 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue change of -2.28 %.
With a net margin of 90.28 %, Interactive Brokers Group Inc achieved higher profitability than its competitors (25.76 %).
Interactive Brokers Group Inc generated 1.40 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 1.36 % a year earlier.
Interactive Brokers Group Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Interactive Brokers Group Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Interactive Brokers Group Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Interactive Brokers Group Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Investment Services industry grew revenue -2.0% year over year, combined, vs 0.1% for Interactive Brokers Group Inc. Interactive Brokers Group Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.58% to 0.59%, a gain of 0.01 percentage points.
Interactive Brokers Group Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interactive Brokers Group Inc | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Competitors combined (13) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
IBKR Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
IBKR Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
IBKR Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oppenheimer Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Virtu Financial inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Sei Investments Company | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Morgan Stanley | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Interactive Brokers Group Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Interactive Brokers Group Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
The market for electronic brokerage services is rapidly evolving and highly competitive. We believe that we fit neither within the definition of a traditional broker nor that of a traditional prime broker. Our primary competitors include offerings targeted to professional traders by large retail online brokers (such as TD Ameritrades thinkorswim, E*TRADE Pro business, and The Charles Schwab Corporations StreetSmart Edge and optionsXpress businesses) and the prime brokerage and electronic brokerage arms of major investment banks and brokers (such as Goldman Sachs Electronic Trading (GSET), and Morgan Stanley Electronic Trading (MSET)). We also encounter competition to a lesser extent from full commission brokerage firms including Bank of America Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, as well as other financial institutions, most of which provide online brokerage services. The electronic brokerage businesses of many of our competitors are relatively insignificant in the totality of their firms business and many impose significant account equity minimums, which we do not. We provide access to a global range of products from a single IB Universal AccountSM and professional level executions and pricing, which positions us in competition with niche direct-access providers and prime brokers. In addition to offering low commissions and financing rates, we provide sophisticated order types and analytical tools that give a competitive edge to our customers.
Market Making
Historically, competition has come from registered market making firms which range from sole proprietors with very limited resources to large integrated broker-dealers. Today, our major competitors continue to be large broker-dealers, such as Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, UBS, Citigroup, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, and niche players such as Citadel, Susquehanna, Virtu, Wolverine Trading, Group One Trading, Peak6 and Knight Capital Group. Some of our competitors in market making are larger than we are and have more captive order flow, although this is less true with respect to our narrow focus on options, futures and ETFs listed on electronic exchanges.
The competitive environment for market makers has evolved considerably in the past several years, most notably with the rise in HFTs, which transact significant trading volume on electronic exchanges by using complex algorithms and high speed execution software that analyzes market conditions. HFTs that are not registered market makers operate with fewer regulatory restrictions and are able to move more quickly and trade more cheaply. This issue is currently an area of focus amongst regulators who are examining the practices of HFTs and their impact on market structure.
To compete successfully, we believe that we must have more sophisticated, versatile and robust software than our competitors. This is our primary focus, as contrasted with many of our competitors. With respect to these competitors, we maintain the advantage of having had much longer experience with the development and usage of proprietary electronic brokerage and market making systems. Market conditions that are difficult for other market participants often present us with the opportunities inherent in diminished competition. Our advantage is our expertise and decades of single-minded focus on developing our technology. This enables us to have a unique platform specializing strictly in electronic market making and brokerage.
Publicly Traded Peers of Interactive Brokers Group Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Interactive Brokers Group Inc | 39,193.67 | 6,449.00 |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 404,609.27 | 121,098.00 |
| Morgan Stanley | 303,821.16 | 68,350.00 |
| The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 279,373.77 | 52,259.00 |
| Schwab Charles Corp | 170,943.70 | 26,025.00 |
| Robinhood Markets Inc | 106,211.52 | 4,932.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 1,400,945.75 | 466,772.09 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Interactive Brokers Group Inc .
Sources: Interactive Brokers Group Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Interactive Brokers Group Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Interactive Brokers Group Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Up Fintech Holding Limited | Named by the company | 85% |
| Lion Group Holding Ltd | Named by the company | 85% |
| Freedom Holding Corp | Named by the company | 85% |
| Knight Capital Group | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Interactive Brokers Group Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Interactive Brokers Group Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Schwab Charles Corp | Investor Services 78.17 % |
| Sei Investments Company | Investment Managers 35.49 % |
| Freedom Holding Corp | Brokerage 38.57 % |
| Stonex Group Inc | Commercial 97.75 % |
| Virtu Financial inc | Market Making 84.81 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Interactive Brokers Group Inc .
Interactive Brokers Group Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interactive Brokers Group Inc | 39,194 | 1,975,191 | 1,499,541 |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 404,609 | 568,535 | 158,005 |
| Morgan Stanley | 303,821 | 823,494 | 245,422 |
| The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 279,374 | 1,102,511 | 442,468 |
| Schwab Charles Corp | 170,944 | 788,636 | 305,939 |
| Robinhood Markets Inc | 106,212 | 1,700,690 | 720,000 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 1,361,752 | 1,038,399 | 215,764 |
Sign in to see all peers for Interactive Brokers Group Inc .
Interactive Brokers Group Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Sei Investments Company | United States 85.02 % |
| Freedom Holding Corp | Kazakhstan 83.57 % |
| Stonex Group Inc | Middle East and Asia 90.47 % |
| Virtu Financial inc | United States 78.79 % |
| Oppenheimer Holdings Inc | Americas 93.69 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Interactive Brokers Group Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 88 companies in Interactive Brokers Group Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Interactive Brokers Group Inc ranks #15 of 88 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 1.72 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 606, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Morgan Stanley | 303,821 | 13.32 % |
| 2 | The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 279,374 | 12.24 % |
| 3 | Blackrock Inc | 176,379 | 7.73 % |
| 4 | Schwab Charles Corp | 170,944 | 7.49 % |
| 5 | Futu Holdings Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Robinhood Markets Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Cme Group Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Blackstone Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Kkr and co inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Intercontinental Exchange Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 15 | Interactive Brokers Group Inc | 39,194 | 1.72 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Interactive Brokers Group Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Interactive Brokers Group Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Intercontinental Exchange Inc | 86,547 | -7.38 % |
| 11 | Apollo Global Management Inc | 72,616 | -11.52 % |
| 12 | Brookfield Asset Management Ltd | 72,059 | -24.17 % |
| 13 | Nasdaq Inc | 52,585 | 6.49 % |
| 14 | Ameriprise Financial Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 15 | Interactive Brokers Group Inc | 39,194 | 35.93 % |
| 16 | Raymond James Financial Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 17 | Nomura Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 18 | Cboe Global Markets Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 19 | Ares Management Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 20 | Lpl Financial Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Interactive Brokers Group Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Interactive Brokers Group Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Investment Services industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (78 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | - | 61.67 % (avg) | - |
| Operating Margin | - | industry median | - |
| EBITDA Margin | 84.04 % | 19.52 % (avg) | +64.5 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 1.26 % | 2.93 % (avg) | -1.7 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Interactive Brokers Group Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Investment Services industry average (78 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 35.5x | 23.9x | +11.6x |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.3x | 12.8x | -8.5x |
| P/B | 1.9x | 3.0x | -1.1x |
| Return on Equity | 23.46 % | industry aggregate | 7.62 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | 8.46 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Interactive Brokers Group Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 30.64 % | 22.78 % | 9.04 % | 20.62 % | 13.01 % | 41.51 % | 19.47 % | 19.67 % |
| Operating Margin | 73.64 % | 67.79 % | 62.25 % | 65.84 % | 65.15 % | 70.71 % | 71.26 % | 76.89 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 7.34 % | 7.94 % | 7.05 % | 6.41 % | 1.50 % | 2.11 % | 2.19 % | 8.96 % |
| P/E | 55.6x | 22.3x | 21.9x | 23.0x | 20.7x | 59.6x | 26.5x | 30.6x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Interactive Brokers Group Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Interactive Brokers Group Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Interactive Brokers Group Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.13x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 9.2% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Interactive Brokers Group Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 606 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 1.26 % vs industry average 2.93 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Interactive Brokers Group Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Interactive Brokers Group Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Interactive Brokers Group Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Interactive Brokers Group Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Interactive Brokers Group Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Return on equity 7.6 points above the industry aggregate.
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-8.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.13x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-9.1% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Interactive Brokers Group Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interactive Brokers Group Inc | 0.17 | 0.66 | 0.00 |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 0.09 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Morgan Stanley | 0.40 | 1.12 | 3.16 |
| The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 0.50 | 0.79 | 3.11 |
| Schwab Charles Corp | 0.10 | 1.04 | 0.79 |
| Robinhood Markets Inc | 0.25 | 0.99 | 0.06 |
Sign in to see all peers for Interactive Brokers Group Inc .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Interactive Brokers Group Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interactive Brokers Group Inc | Q2 2026 | +0.1 % | +33.0 % |
| Bank Of America Corporation | Q2 2026 | +15.0 % | +27.5 % |
| Morgan Stanley | Q2 2026 | -30.6 % | +58.1 % |
| The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | Q2 2026 | -65.3 % | +78.0 % |
| Schwab Charles Corp | Q2 2026 | +20.9 % | +31.7 % |
| Robinhood Markets Inc | Q2 2026 | +32.3 % | +48.4 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | -2.3 % | +42.0 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Interactive Brokers Group Inc .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Interactive Brokers Group Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interactive Brokers Group Inc | Q2 2026 | - | +28.6 % |
| Bank Of America Corporation | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| Morgan Stanley | Q2 2026 | - | +7.3 % |
| The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | Q2 2026 | -73.4 % | +5.5 % |
| Schwab Charles Corp | Q2 2026 | - | +44.5 % |
| Robinhood Markets Inc | Q2 2026 | - | -83.3 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Interactive Brokers Group Inc .
Interactive Brokers Group Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interactive Brokers Group Inc | 2.25% | 5.97% | 23.46% |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 0.97% | 2.76% | 11.13% |
| Morgan Stanley | 1.35% | 1.95% | 17.85% |
| The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 1.07% | 1.86% | 16.95% |
| Schwab Charles Corp | 2.05% | 4.01% | 20.38% |
| Robinhood Markets Inc | 4.60% | 8.94% | 22.61% |
Sign in to see all peers for Interactive Brokers Group Inc .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Interactive Brokers Group Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Interactive Brokers Group Inc | 34.69 | 6.08 |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 12.78 | 3.34 |
| Morgan Stanley | 15.67 | 4.45 |
| The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 14.19 | 5.35 |
| Schwab Charles Corp | 118.43 | 6.57 |
| Robinhood Markets Inc | 51.30 | 21.54 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 13.93 | 3.00 |
Sign in to see all peers for Interactive Brokers Group Inc .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.