Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Hub Cyber Security Ltd (HUBC) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Hub Cyber Security Ltd vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 30M vs 573,225M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+477.2% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-12.2%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Hub Cyber Security Ltd generated -46.5% revenue growth year over year in Q4 2023, vs -15.6% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -203.1% net margin compares with 26.6% for the peer group.
- Scale: Hub Cyber Security Ltd ranks #15 of 15 companies by market capitalization in the Computer Networks industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Hub Cyber Security Ltd accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 0.1% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
HUBC Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2023
Hub Cyber Security Ltd reported revenue contraction of 46.51 % year on year in Q4 2023, below its competitors' combined revenue change of -15.55 %.
With a net margin of -203.10 %, Hub Cyber Security Ltd reported lower profitability than its competitors (26.56 %).
Hub Cyber Security Ltd generated 0.03 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 0.05 % a year earlier.
Hub Cyber Security Ltd vs. its Competitors, Q4 2023
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Hub Cyber Security Ltd reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Hub Cyber Security Ltd and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Hub Cyber Security Ltd | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (5) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (2) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Hub Cyber Security Ltd's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Computer Networks industry grew revenue 19.6% year over year, combined, vs -46.5% for Hub Cyber Security Ltd. Hub Cyber Security Ltd's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.36% to 0.16%, a loss of 0.20 percentage points.
Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hub Cyber Security Ltd | - | No | No | No |
| Competitors combined (13) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (5) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
HUBC Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
HUBC Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
HUBC Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fortinet Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Palo Alto Networks Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Cisco Systems Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Juniper Networks Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Microsoft Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Hub Cyber Security Ltd's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Hub Cyber Security Ltd
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Hub Cyber Security Ltd | 0.02 | 29.56 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 3,909,173.03 | 331,839.00 |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 424,615.50 | 63,325.00 |
| Oracle Corporation | 378,480.00 | 73,266.00 |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | 290,740.20 | 11,480.00 |
| Sap Se | 279,814.50 | 41,606.87 |
| SUBTOTAL | 5,708,096.81 | 615,766.30 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Hub Cyber Security Ltd .
Sources: Hub Cyber Security Ltd's official press releases and company reports; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the company reports and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Hub Cyber Security Ltd versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Hub Cyber Security Ltd reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Cisco Systems Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Fortinet Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Informatica Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Microsoft Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Check Point Software Technologies Ltd | Company report | 85% |
| Quantum Computing Inc | Company report | 85% |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Oracle Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Juniper Networks Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Mcafee Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Sap Se | Company report | 85% |
| Cloudera Inc | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Hub Cyber Security Ltd's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from Hub Cyber Security Ltd reports (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Corporation | Productivity and Business Processes 42.19 % |
| Cisco Systems Inc | Americas 60.41 % |
| Oracle Corporation | Cloud and Software Business 83.96 % |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Software 45.63 % |
| Parsons Corporation | Critical Infrastructure Segment 49.16 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Hub Cyber Security Ltd .
Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hub Cyber Security Ltd | 0 | - | - |
| Microsoft Corporation | 3,909,173 | 1,488,067 | 599,771 |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 424,616 | 768,507 | 161,007 |
| Oracle Corporation | 378,480 | 519,617 | 134,184 |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | 290,740 | 523,699 | 14,005 |
| Sap Se | 279,815 | 378,244 | 75,299 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 5,708,097 | 652,373 | 200,556 |
Sign in to see all peers for Hub Cyber Security Ltd .
Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Corporation | US 51.47 % |
| Oracle Corporation | Americas 63.46 % |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | United States 61.76 % |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Americas 50.14 % |
| Fortinet Inc | EMEA 42.44 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Sign in to see all peers for Hub Cyber Security Ltd .
Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 15 companies in Hub Cyber Security Ltd's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Hub Cyber Security Ltd ranks #15 of 15 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 4,968, indicating a highly concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cisco Systems Inc | 424,616 | 62.49 % |
| 2 | Arista Networks inc | 219,944 | 32.37 % |
| 3 | F5 Inc | 26,209 | 3.86 % |
| 4 | Extreme Networks Inc | 2,965 | 0.44 % |
| 5 | Digi International Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | A10 Networks Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Allot Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Lantronix Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Silicom Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Bos Better Online Solutions Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 15 | Hub Cyber Security Ltd | 0 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Hub Cyber Security Ltd's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-10-23.
Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Bos Better Online Solutions Ltd | 27 | -10.60 % |
| 11 | Foxx Development Holdings Inc | 14 | -53.89 % |
| 12 | Intrusion Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 13 | Tianci International Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 14 | Wearable Devices Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 15 | Hub Cyber Security Ltd | 0 | -100.00 % |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Hub Cyber Security Ltd's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-10-23. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Computer Networks industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (36 companies). See the full Computer Networks industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 17.07 % | 44.15 % (avg) | -27.1 pp |
| Operating Margin | -88.71 % | industry median | -89.8 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | - | 0.90 % (avg) | - |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.28 % | 3.87 % (avg) | -3.6 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Computer Networks industry average (36 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Computer Networks industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 43.1x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 21.5x | - |
| P/B | -0.3x | 4.3x | -4.6x |
| Return on Equity | 48.30 % | industry aggregate | 27.97 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 5.83 % | -1.00 % (avg) | 6.83 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Hub Cyber Security Ltd's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Hub Cyber Security Ltd is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Hub Cyber Security Ltd's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Hub Cyber Security Ltd's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Hub Cyber Security Ltd falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue -0.6% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Cisco Systems Inc alone holds 62% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Low | Industry HHI of 4,968 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.28 % vs industry average 3.87 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Hub Cyber Security Ltd's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Hub Cyber Security Ltd's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Hub Cyber Security Ltd falls in the Medium attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Hub Cyber Security Ltd's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Return on equity 28.0 points above the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+477.2% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 89.8 points below the industry median.
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Cisco Systems Inc , holding 62.49 % of industry market cap.
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-12.2% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hub Cyber Security Ltd | 0.03 | 0.17 | - |
| Microsoft Corporation | 0.13 | 1.31 | 0.11 |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 0.25 | 0.94 | 0.63 |
| Oracle Corporation | 0.72 | 1.12 | 2.83 |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | 0.30 | 0.91 | 0.04 |
| Sap Se | 0.47 | 1.16 | 0.10 |
Sign in to see all peers for Hub Cyber Security Ltd .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hub Cyber Security Ltd | Q4 2023 | -30.7 % | - |
| Microsoft Corporation | Q2 2026 | +17.7 % | +31.3 % |
| Cisco Systems Inc | Q2 2026 | +17.6 % | +51.3 % |
| Oracle Corporation | Q3 2026 | +24.0 % | +62.6 % |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | Q2 2026 | +34.4 % | - |
| Sap Se | Q4 2025 | +12.5 % | +143.0 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +15.8 % | +43.3 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Hub Cyber Security Ltd .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hub Cyber Security Ltd | Q4 2023 | -41.5 % | -71.7 % |
| Microsoft Corporation | Q2 2026 | +22.9 % | +109.6 % |
| Cisco Systems Inc | Q2 2026 | +14.8 % | +79.7 % |
| Oracle Corporation | Q3 2026 | - | +235.2 % |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | Q2 2026 | +62.9 % | +19.4 % |
| Sap Se | Q4 2025 | +9.6 % | - |
Sign in to see all peers for Hub Cyber Security Ltd .
Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hub Cyber Security Ltd | - | - | - |
| Microsoft Corporation | 19.76% | 22.48% | 34.22% |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 10.64% | 11.94% | 27.52% |
| Oracle Corporation | 7.73% | 9.84% | 44.45% |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | 0.87% | 0.81% | 1.71% |
| Sap Se | 10.03% | 12.84% | 15.66% |
Sign in to see all peers for Hub Cyber Security Ltd .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Hub Cyber Security Ltd | - | 0.00 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 29.22 | 11.78 |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 31.89 | 6.71 |
| Oracle Corporation | 19.77 | 5.17 |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | 776.63 | 25.33 |
| Sap Se | 39.07 | 6.73 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 30.16 | 9.27 |
Sign in to see all peers for Hub Cyber Security Ltd .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.