Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Hub Cyber Security Ltd (HUBC) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2023
Competitors Tracked
13
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
0.03 %
vs 0.05 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-46.51 %
Peers: -15.55 %
Net Margin
-203.10 %
Peers: 26.56 %

Key Findings: Hub Cyber Security Ltd vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 30M vs 572,453M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+477.2% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-12.1%) for its tracked peer group.
  • Growth: Hub Cyber Security Ltd generated -46.5% revenue growth year over year in Q4 2023, vs -15.6% for its tracked competitors combined.
  • Profitability: Its -203.1% net margin compares with 26.6% for the peer group.
  • Scale: Hub Cyber Security Ltd ranks #15 of 15 companies by market capitalization in the Computer Networks industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Hub Cyber Security Ltd accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 0.1% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

HUBC Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2023

Hub Cyber Security Ltd reported revenue contraction of 46.51 % year on year in Q4 2023, below its competitors' combined revenue change of -15.55 %.

With a net margin of -203.10 %, Hub Cyber Security Ltd reported lower profitability than its competitors (26.56 %).

Hub Cyber Security Ltd generated 0.03 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 0.05 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/HUBC/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/HUBC/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/HUBC/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Hub Cyber Security Ltd vs. its Competitors, Q4 2023

Revenue growth, year on year

Hub Cyber Security Ltd -46.5 %
Competitors combined -15.6 %

Net margin

Hub Cyber Security Ltd -203.1 %
Competitors combined +26.6 %

Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months

Hub Cyber Security Ltd +477.2 %
Competitors combined -12.1 %

TTM net margin

Hub Cyber Security Ltd -132.0 %
Competitors combined +31.6 %

TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.

Competitor Financial Benchmarking - TTM Commercial

TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Hub Cyber Security Ltd and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.

Entity TTM Revenue Latest Q ×4 Rev Run-rate vs TTM TTM Net Income TTM Net Margin
Hub Cyber Security Ltd $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitors combined $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Similar-Size Competitors (5) $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitor Financial Benchmarking

TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Hub Cyber Security Ltd's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

For context: the Computer Networks industry grew revenue 19.6% year over year, combined, vs -46.5% for Hub Cyber Security Ltd. Hub Cyber Security Ltd's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.36% to 0.16%, a loss of 0.20 percentage points.

Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Hub Cyber Security Ltd - - - -
Competitors combined (13) 85% 77% 69% 15%
Similar-Size Competitors (5) 25% 80% 80% 60%

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q4 2023

0%market share
  • Hub Cyber Security Ltd0.0%
  • Competitors combined100.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Hub Cyber Security Ltd and its 13 tracked competitors.

See Hub Cyber Security Ltd's full market share breakdown »

HUBC Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

HUBC Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
25%beat U.S.A. 500
Competitors Combined
(3 of 12)
0%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(0 of 5)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Hub Cyber Security Ltd -100.00 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (12) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (5) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Hub Cyber Security Ltd's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

HUBC Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

HUBC Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 5) Percent change over the selected range

5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months

#CompetitorTTM Share Price Returnvs U.S.A. 500
1 Fortinet Inc 282.9% Outperformed
2 Palo Alto Networks Inc 282.9% Outperformed
3 Cisco Systems Inc 282.9% Outperformed
4 Juniper Networks Inc 282.9% Outperformed
5 Microsoft Corporation 282.9% Outperformed
Best-Performing Competitor Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Hub Cyber Security Ltd's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.

Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The Board of Directors assesses and establishes the leadership structure to ensure independent oversight of management, adapting as circumstances require. Currently, the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairperson of the Board are separate. Renah Persofsky serves as the non-executive Active Chairperson of the Board of Directors.

Publicly Traded Peers of Hub Cyber Security Ltd

Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees
Company Market Cap Revenues Income Employees
Hub Cyber Security Ltd 0.14 29.56 -39.03 -
Microsoft Corporation 3,767,677.82 331,839.00 133,749.00 223,000
Cisco Systems Inc 424,834.79 63,325.00 13,267.00 82,400
Oracle Corporation 401,010.00 73,266.00 18,920.00 141,000
Palo Alto Networks Inc 292,913.78 11,480.00 307.00 21,921
Sap Se 245,904.00 41,216.00 8,205.12 110,000
SUBTOTAL 5,516,726.53 614,603.43 188,729.91 943,842
8 more competitors available

Sign in to see all competitors of Hub Cyber Security Ltd .

Sources: Hub Cyber Security Ltd's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Hub Cyber Security Ltd versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.

Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Oracle Corporation Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Juniper Networks Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Mcafee Corp Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Sap Se Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Cloudera Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Cisco Systems Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Fortinet Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Informatica Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Microsoft Corporation Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Quantum Computing Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
International Business Machines Corporation Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Palo Alto Networks Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Hub Cyber Security Ltd's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).
Company Largest Segment 2nd Segment 3rd Segment
Microsoft Corporation Productivity and Business Processes 42.19 % Intelligent Cloud 41.52 % More Personal Computing 16.29 %
Cisco Systems Inc Americas 60.41 % Europe, Middle East, and Africa 25.59 % Asia Pacific, Japan, and China 14.00 %
Oracle Corporation Cloud and Software Business 83.96 % Services Business 8.06 % Hardware Business 3.99 %
International Business Machines Corporation Software 45.22 % Consulting 31.04 % Infrastructure 22.35 %
Cloudera Inc Subscription 90.36 % Services 9.64 % -

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).

2 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Hub Cyber Security Ltd .

Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Productivity vs Peers Comparison

Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $
CompanyMarket CapRevenue / EmployeeIncome / Employee
Hub Cyber Security Ltd 0 - -
Microsoft Corporation 3,767,678 1,488,067 599,771
Cisco Systems Inc 424,835 768,507 161,007
Oracle Corporation 401,010 519,617 134,184
Palo Alto Networks Inc 292,914 523,699 14,005
Sap Se 245,904 374,691 74,592
PEERS TOTAL 5,516,726 651,141 200,001
8 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Hub Cyber Security Ltd .

Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers

Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.
Company Largest Market 2nd Market 3rd Market
Microsoft Corporation US 51.47 % Non Us 48.53 % -
Oracle Corporation Americas 63.46 % EMEA 22.14 % Asia Pacific 10.42 %
Palo Alto Networks Inc United States 61.76 % EMEA 21.09 % Asia Pacific 11.69 %
International Business Machines Corporation Americas 49.04 % EMEA 32.82 % Asia Pacific 18.13 %
Fortinet Inc EMEA 42.44 % United States 28.47 % Asia Pacific 17.58 %

Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.

4 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Hub Cyber Security Ltd .

Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Position in Industry Market Structure

Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 15 companies in Hub Cyber Security Ltd's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.

Hub Cyber Security Ltd ranks #15 of 15 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 4,812, indicating a highly concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).

Rank Company Market Cap Industry Share
1 Cisco Systems Inc 425,572 59.03 %
2 Arista Networks inc 261,478 36.27 %
3 F5 Inc 25,066 3.48 %
4 Digi International Inc 3,044 0.42 %
5 Extreme Networks Inc 1,234 5.2%
6 A10 Networks Inc 1,234 5.2%
7 Allot Ltd 1,234 5.2%
8 Silicom Ltd 1,234 5.2%
9 Lantronix Inc 1,234 5.2%
10 Bos Better Online Solutions Ltd 1,234 5.2%
15 Hub Cyber Security Ltd 0 0.00 %
Full Industry Market Structure

Market cap and industry share for the rest of Hub Cyber Security Ltd's industry peers requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.

Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance

Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.
Rank Company Market Cap TTM Return 3M Momentum Beta Sharpe (1Y)
10 Bos Better Online Solutions Ltd 29 -1.88 % 9.03 % 0.46 0.04
11 Foxx Development Holdings Inc 18 -47.47 % -28.71 % 0.80 0.26
12 Intrusion Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
13 Tianci International Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
14 Wearable Devices Ltd 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
15 Hub Cyber Security Ltd 0 -99.99 % 30.50 % -0.68 -21.61
Full Same-Size Peer Performance

Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Hub Cyber Security Ltd's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.

Hub Cyber Security Ltd's BCG Growth-Share Matrix

Relative market share (vs Hub Cyber Security Ltd's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.

Question Mark Star Dog Cash Cow Relative Market Share (vs largest competitor) Industry Revenue Growth (%) Hub Cyber Security Ltd

Hub Cyber Security Ltd falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 2.8% (median, trailing 12 months).

Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Cisco Systems Inc alone holds 59% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.

Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)

Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.
Force Assessment Basis
Competitive Rivalry Low Industry HHI of 4,812 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above)
Supplier Power Not covered on this page See Hub Cyber Security Ltd's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data
Buyer Power Not covered on this page See Hub Cyber Security Ltd's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data
Threat of Substitutes - No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated

Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.

Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength

A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.

High Strength
Medium Strength
Low Strength
High Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Invest / Grow
Selective
Medium Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Selective
Harvest Hub Cyber Security Ltd
Low Attractiveness
Selective
Harvest
Harvest / Divest

Hub Cyber Security Ltd falls in the Medium attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.

Hub Cyber Security Ltd's SWOT

Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.

Strengths

  • Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+477.2% annualized vs trailing 12 months).

Weaknesses

  • Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
  • Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).

Opportunities

No rule matched.

Threats

  • Industry dominated by Cisco Systems Inc , holding 59.03 % of industry market cap.
  • Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-12.1% annualized).

Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.

Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison

Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months
CompanyQuick RatioWorking CapitalDebt / EquityAsset Turnover
Hub Cyber Security Ltd 0.03 0.17 - 1.08
Microsoft Corporation 0.13 1.31 0.11 0.49
Cisco Systems Inc 0.25 0.94 0.63 0.51
Oracle Corporation 0.72 1.12 2.83 0.30
Palo Alto Networks Inc 0.30 0.91 0.04 0.32
Sap Se 0.47 1.16 - 0.52
8 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Hub Cyber Security Ltd .

Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers

Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodRevenue Y/YRevenue Q/QIncome Y/YIncome Q/Q
Hub Cyber Security Ltd Q4 2023-30.7 %-30.7 %--
Microsoft CorporationQ2 2026+17.7 %+8.6 %+31.3 %+12.5 %
Cisco Systems Inc Q2 2026+17.6 %+8.9 %+51.3 %+14.4 %
Oracle CorporationQ3 2026+24.0 %+0.8 %+62.6 %+10.6 %
Palo Alto Networks IncQ2 2026+34.4 %+13.6 %--
Sap SeQ4 2025+7.7 %+7.7 %+132.6 %+132.6 %
PEERS TOTAL+14.3 %+7.3 %+41.0 %+23.5 %
8 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Hub Cyber Security Ltd .

Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures

Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodCosts Y/YCosts Q/QCapex Y/YCapex Q/Q
Hub Cyber Security Ltd Q4 2023-41.5 %-41.5 %-71.7 %-71.7 %
Microsoft CorporationQ2 2026+22.9 %+10.1 %+109.6 %+129.6 %
Cisco Systems Inc Q2 2026+14.8 %+7.5 %+79.7 %+239.1 %
Oracle CorporationQ3 2026--+235.2 %+72.8 %
Palo Alto Networks IncQ2 2026+62.9 %+13.6 %+19.4 %+13.4 %
Sap SeQ4 2025+8.0 %+8.0 %--
8 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Hub Cyber Security Ltd .

Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Returns and Turnover vs Peers

ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover
CompanyROAROIROEReceivables TurnoverInventory Turnover
Hub Cyber Security Ltd ---3.74-
Microsoft Corporation19.76%22.48%34.22%5.0390.84
Cisco Systems Inc 10.64%11.94%27.52%9.945.30
Oracle Corporation7.73%9.84%44.45%7.145.96
Palo Alto Networks Inc0.87%0.81%1.71%4.26-
Sap Se10.41%13.84%16.25%5.26-
8 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Hub Cyber Security Ltd .

ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).

Hub Cyber Security Ltd's Valuation vs Peers

P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book
CompanyP/EPrice / SalesPEGP/CFPrice / Book
Hub Cyber Security Ltd -0.00-0.04-
Microsoft Corporation28.1611.350.73-8.52
Cisco Systems Inc 31.906.710.86-8.45
Oracle Corporation20.955.470.4214.085.97
Palo Alto Networks Inc782.4425.52-1,200.4710.65
Sap Se34.345.970.1922.854.87
PEERS AVERAGE29.238.98220.358.00
8 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Hub Cyber Security Ltd .

P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.