Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Fusion Fuel Green Plc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Fusion Fuel Green Plc (HTOO) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2025
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
Share of combined sales, Q4 2025
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-
Q4 2025
Net Margin
-11.75 %
Q4 2025

Key Findings: Fusion Fuel Green Plc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 16M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Peer revenue share: Fusion Fuel Green Plc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

HTOO Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025

Fusion Fuel Green Plc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/HTOO/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/HTOO/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/HTOO/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Fusion Fuel Green Plc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Fusion Fuel Green Plc No Yes Yes No
High-Confidence Competitors (3) 100% 67% 0% 0%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 12.50 % (1 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 14.30 % (1 of 7)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q4 2025

100%market share
  • Fusion Fuel Green Plc100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Fusion Fuel Green Plc and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Fusion Fuel Green Plc's full market share breakdown »

HTOO Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

HTOO Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Fusion Fuel Green Plc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
33.3%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(1 of 3)
16.7%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(1 of 6)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Fusion Fuel Green Plc -60.60 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (3) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (6) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Fusion Fuel Green Plc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

HTOO Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

HTOO High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 3) Percent change over the selected range

HTOO Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

HTOO Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Fusion Fuel Green Plc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company operates in competitive sectors including energy engineering, advisory solutions, and gas distribution. The market is mature, with established competitors possessing significant operational experience, customer relationships, and brand recognition. The company has transitioned from proprietary technology development to competing based on service quality, cost-effectiveness, and operational efficiency. It faces risks in maintaining or establishing a competitive position, particularly in the gas distribution business of Al Shola Gas. Currently, the company's ongoing operations do not generate sufficient free cash flow to cover administrative, legal, and listing expenses. Additionally, the company may be at a competitive disadvantage compared to competitors with lower debt levels, potentially limiting its flexibility and ability to pursue business opportunities.

Fusion Fuel Green Plc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Engie Hydrogen Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Linde Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Al Fanar Gas Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
ITM Power Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Royal Development for Gas Works Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Air Liquide Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Giner Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
McPhy Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Al Shola Gas Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Lahej & Sultan Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Shell Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Air Products Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Hidrogenics Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
NEL Hydrogen Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Fusion Fuel Green Plc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.