Helen Of Troy Limited (HELE) — Comparison of Productivity to Peers
Helen Of Troy Limited's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Table 1: Market Cap, Revenue per Employee, Income per Employee for the 12 Months period ended in Q3 2025
| COMPANY NAME TICKER |
MARKET CAP (Millions $) |
REVENUE / EMPLOYEE ($) in 12 months |
INCOME / EMPLOYEE ($) in 12 months |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Helen Of Troy Limited
HELE |
477 | 728,562 | -263,742 |
|
Revlon Inc
REVRQ |
4 | 330,067 | -112,317 |
|
Est e Lauder Companies Inc
EL |
37,718 | 233,000 | -15,000 |
|
International Flavors and Fragrances Inc
IFF |
17,088 | 514,977 | -19,070 |
|
The Clorox Company
CLX |
12,929 | 769,432 | 91,250 |
|
Avon Products Inc
AVP |
0 | - | - |
|
Procter and Gamble Co
PG |
354,082 | 786,417 | 156,102 |
|
Corning Inc
GLW |
73,487 | 298,300 | 29,900 |
|
Becton Dickinson And Company
BDX |
55,864 | 295,135 | 22,676 |
|
Baxter International Inc
BAX |
9,499 | 214,707 | -8,268 |
|
Patterson Companies Inc
PDCO |
2,791 | 1,050,271 | 22,330 |
|
Mckesson Corporation
MCK |
101,284 | 7,590,078 | 82,902 |
|
Cardinal Health Inc
CAH |
47,606 | 4,791,616 | 32,843 |
|
Abbott Laboratories
ABT |
219,370 | 384,588 | 122,605 |
|
Kimberly clark Corporation
KMB |
34,928 | 441,585 | 59,854 |
|
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc
TMO |
217,441 | 358,492 | 53,893 |
|
3m Company
MMM |
91,084 | 292,059 | 40,188 |
|
Coty Inc
COTY |
2,971 | 491,824 | -31,117 |
|
Interparfums Inc
IPAR |
2,640 | 4,141,422 | 585,201 |
|
Sensient Technologies Corp
SXT |
4,028 | 410,482 | 35,454 |
|
Tupperware Brands Corporation
TUP |
24 | 1,101,936 | -363,504 |
|
Jubilant Flame International Ltd
JFIL |
1 | - | - |
|
Owlet Inc
OWLT |
264 | 455,205 | -207,860 |
|
European Wax Center Inc
EWCZ |
176 | 140,843 | 15,094 |
| SUBTOTAL | 1,285,278 | 1,090,843 | 58,268 |
What this table shows: Productivity metrics illustrate how effectively a company converts workforce and capital into value. Higher Revenue per Employee and Net Income per Employee generally reflect stronger operating efficiency and business scalability. First row shows Company's Productivity, followed by it's corporate peers. Click any company name in the table to view its complete financial analysis and comparison.
Helen Of Troy Limited's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Table 2: Quick Ratio, Working Capital, Debt/Equity, Asset Turnover
| COMPANY NAME TICKER |
QUICK (Ratio) |
WORKING CAPITAL (Ratio) |
DEBT / EQUITY (Ratio) |
ASSET TURNOVER (Ratio) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Helen Of Troy Limited HELE |
0.05 | 1.83 | 0.62 | 0.65 |
| Revlon Inc
REVRQ |
0.21 | 1.08 | - | 0.80 |
| Est e Lauder Companies Inc
EL |
- | 1.35 | 1.80 | 0.73 |
| International Flavors and Fragrances Inc
IFF |
0.04 | 1.76 | 0.55 | 0.41 |
| The Clorox Company
CLX |
0.11 | 0.81 | 11.17 | 1.22 |
| Avon Products Inc
AVP |
0.17 | 0.77 | - | 1.26 |
| Procter and Gamble Co
PG |
- | 0.61 | 0.77 | 0.71 |
| Corning Inc
GLW |
0.09 | 1.59 | 0.66 | 0.52 |
| Becton Dickinson And Company
BDX |
0.18 | 1.20 | 0.70 | 0.40 |
| Baxter International Inc
BAX |
0.45 | 1.77 | 0.51 | 0.39 |
| Patterson Companies Inc
PDCO |
0.10 | 1.35 | 0.46 | 2.27 |
| Mckesson Corporation
MCK |
0.05 | 0.89 | - | 4.97 |
| Cardinal Health Inc
CAH |
0.10 | 0.96 | - | 4.57 |
| Abbott Laboratories
ABT |
0.65 | 1.70 | 0.45 | 0.60 |
| Kimberly clark Corporation
KMB |
0.10 | 0.78 | 5.28 | 1.08 |
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc
TMO |
0.40 | 1.71 | 0.68 | 0.44 |
| 3m Company
MMM |
- | 1.64 | 3.00 | 0.64 |
| Coty Inc
COTY |
0.11 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.49 |
| Interparfums Inc
IPAR |
0.63 | 2.98 | 0.17 | 0.98 |
| Sensient Technologies Corp
SXT |
0.16 | 4.16 | 0.62 | 0.76 |
| Tupperware Brands Corporation
TUP |
0.12 | 0.42 | - | 1.58 |
| Jubilant Flame International Ltd
JFIL |
0.00 | 0.01 | - | 3.37 |
| Owlet Inc
OWLT |
0.43 | 1.18 | - | 1.64 |
| European Wax Center Inc
EWCZ |
1.87 | 3.01 | 3.77 | 0.29 |
| SUBTOTAL | 0.13 | 1.06 | 0.88 | 1.42 |
What this table shows: Financial Strength ratios measure short-term liquidity (Quick Ratio, Working Capital), leverage (Debt/Equity), and operational utilization (Asset Turnover). These indicators highlight how well management allocates resources and maintains financial stability.
Helen Of Troy Limited's Underlying Financial Totals (Revenue, Income, Employees) vs Peers Comparison
Table 3: Revenue (TTM), Net Income (TTM), Net Margin, Employees, ending Q3 2025
| COMPANY NAME TICKER |
REVENUE (TTM) Millions $ |
NET INCOME (TTM) Millions $ |
NET MARGIN (%) |
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helen Of Troy Limited HELE |
1,819.9 | -658.8 | -36.2% | 2,498 |
| Revlon Inc REVRQ |
1,980 | -674 | -34.03% | 6,000 |
| Est e Lauder Companies Inc EL |
14,446 | -930 | -6.44% | 62,000 |
| International Flavors and Fragrances Inc IFF |
11,072 | -410 | -3.7% | 21,500 |
| The Clorox Company CLX |
6,771 | 803 | 11.86% | 8,800 |
| Avon Products Inc AVP |
2,696 | -451 | -16.72% | - |
| Procter and Gamble Co PG |
84,933 | 16,859 | 19.85% | 108,000 |
| Corning Inc GLW |
14,915 | 1,495 | 10.02% | 50,000 |
| Becton Dickinson And Company BDX |
21,840 | 1,678 | 7.68% | 74,000 |
| Baxter International Inc BAX |
8,803 | -339 | -3.85% | 41,000 |
| Patterson Companies Inc PDCO |
6,512 | 138 | 2.13% | 6,200 |
| Mckesson Corporation MCK |
387,094 | 4,228 | 1.09% | 51,000 |
| Cardinal Health Inc CAH |
234,310 | 1,606 | 0.69% | 48,900 |
| Abbott Laboratories ABT |
43,843 | 13,977 | 31.88% | 114,000 |
| Kimberly clark Corporation KMB |
18,105 | 2,454 | 13.55% | 41,000 |
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc TMO |
43,736 | 6,575 | 15.03% | 122,000 |
| 3m Company MMM |
24,825 | 3,416 | 13.76% | 85,000 |
| Coty Inc COTY |
5,799 | -367 | -6.33% | 11,791 |
| Interparfums Inc IPAR |
1,462 | 207 | 14.13% | 353 |
| Sensient Technologies Corp SXT |
1,624 | 140 | 8.64% | 3,956 |
| Tupperware Brands Corporation TUP |
1,138 | -376 | -32.99% | 1,033 |
| Jubilant Flame International Ltd JFIL |
0 | 0 | -162% | - |
| Owlet Inc OWLT |
98 | -45 | -45.66% | 215 |
| European Wax Center Inc EWCZ |
211 | 23 | 10.72% | 1,500 |
| SUBTOTAL | 936,214 | 50,008 | 5.34% | 858,248 |
What this table shows: These totals provide the raw financial fundamentals behind the productivity, Revenue and Income per Employee ratios above. Revenue, Net Income, and Employee counts reflect the company’s scale, profitability, and workforce size. TTM refers to trailing twelve months.
Methodology & Data Source: Market Capitalization is computed from the latest available share price (delayed up to 15 minutes, depending on exchange rules) multiplied by the company’s diluted share count as reported in its filings. Revenue and Net Income figures used to calculate Revenue per Employee and Net Income per Employee are sourced directly from quarterly and annual financial statements submitted to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Employee counts are taken from the most recent Form 10-K or 10-Q disclosure and may be updated by companies in subsequent SEC submissions. All fundamentals are processed through CSIMarket.com’s XBRL normalization pipeline, which standardizes reported values across all issuers and periods.
Data lineage: SEC Filings → XBRL Extraction → CSIMarket Normalization → Productivity Metrics.
This table is one of the productivity comparisons available for
Helen Of Troy Limited. Across CSIMarket, we provide
nine related comparison tables showing how Helen Of Troy Limited performs against its
Peers, including additional breakdowns visible through our main navigation bar under:
Stocks → Peers.
This page compares Helen Of Troy Limited to its Peers based on Productivity (Market Cap, Revenue per Employee, and Net Income per Employee).
• For a deeper productivity comparison against its industry peers, visit
Helen Of Troy Limited Productivity vs. Industry
• To review historical productivity trends for this company, including long-term changes in Revenue per Employee and Net Income per Employee, visit
Helen Of Troy Limited Productivity History
Page last updated:
CSIMarket data powering this analysis is available across multiple delivery channels:
• Data Downloads (CSV / Excel)
• API & Programmatic Data Access
• Enterprise Data Licensing
• AI Training & Model Development License
• Marketplace Distribution Options
All CSIMarket datasets are designed for analytical workflows, financial modeling, academic research,
and AI/ML applications requiring normalized, reliable, and longitudinal financial time series.
To download the tables, please subscribe.