Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Greensky Inc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Greensky Inc (GSKY) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2021
Competitors Tracked
2
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
80.48 %
vs 82.07 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-0.44 %
Peers: 10.50 %
Net Margin
14.97 %
Peers: 1.07 %

Key Findings: Greensky Inc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 518M vs 135M combined for tracked competitors (79.4% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is holding steady (-1.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-7.6%) for its tracked peer group.
  • Growth: Greensky Inc generated -0.4% revenue growth year over year in Q4 2021, vs 10.5% for its tracked competitors combined.
  • Profitability: Its 15.0% net margin compares with 1.1% for the peer group.
  • Peer revenue share: Greensky Inc accounted for 80.5% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 82.1% a year earlier.
  • Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.40M compares with $0.66M for the peer group (0.6x).

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

GSKY Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2021

Greensky Inc reported revenue contraction of 0.44 % year on year in Q4 2021, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 10.50 %.

With a net margin of 14.97 %, Greensky Inc achieved higher profitability than its competitors (1.07 %).

Greensky Inc generated 80.48 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 82.07 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/GSKY/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/GSKY/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/GSKY/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Greensky Inc vs. its Competitors, Q4 2021

Revenue growth, year on year

Greensky Inc -0.4 %
Competitors combined +10.5 %

Net margin

Greensky Inc +15.0 %
Competitors combined +1.1 %

Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months

Greensky Inc -1.0 %
Competitors combined -7.6 %

TTM net margin

Greensky Inc +22.7 %
Competitors combined -0.2 %

TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.

Competitor Financial Benchmarking - TTM Commercial

TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Greensky Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.

Entity TTM Revenue Latest Q ×4 Rev Run-rate vs TTM TTM Net Income TTM Net Margin
Greensky Inc $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitors combined $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Similar Growth & Profitability (6) $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitor Financial Benchmarking

TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Greensky Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

For context: the Professional Services industry grew revenue 6.8% year over year, combined, vs -0.4% for Greensky Inc. Greensky Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.02% to 0.02%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Greensky Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Greensky Inc Yes No No No
Competitors combined (2) 50% 50% 50% 50%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 87.50 % (7 of 8) 37.50 % (3 of 8) 25.00 % (2 of 8) 14.30 % (1 of 7)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q4 2021

80.5%market share
  • Greensky Inc80.5%
  • Competitors combined19.5%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Greensky Inc and its 2 tracked competitors.

See Greensky Inc's full market share breakdown »

GSKY Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

GSKY Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

GSKY Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

GSKY Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Publicly Traded Peers of Greensky Inc

Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees
Company Market Cap Revenues Income Employees
Greensky Inc 1,843.78 518.07 117.81 1,300
Truleum Inc 103.39 0.08 -2.30 -
Flexshopper Inc 0.16 134.56 2.08 204
SUBTOTAL 1,947.32 652.72 117.59 1,504

Sources: Greensky Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Greensky Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.

Greensky Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison

Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $
CompanyMarket CapRevenue / EmployeeIncome / Employee
Greensky Inc 1,844 398,518 90,626
Truleum Inc 103 - -
Flexshopper Inc 0 659,623 10,195
PEERS TOTAL 104 660,030 -1,100

Greensky Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure

Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Professional Services industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (230 companies). See the full Professional Services industry profitability benchmarks.
Metric Company Industry Difference
Gross Margin 61.61 % 47.17 % (avg) +14.4 pp
Operating Margin 31.12 % industry median +24.9 pp
EBITDA Margin 30.73 % 5.74 % (avg) +25.0 pp
Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) 3.01 % 4.25 % (avg) -1.2 pp

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.

Greensky Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position

Valuation multiples vs the Professional Services industry average (230 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Professional Services industry valuation benchmarks.
Metric Company Industry Average Difference
P/E 23.0x 25.6x -2.6x
EV / EBITDA 14.4x 15.4x -1.0x
P/B -21.7x 3.7x -25.3x
Return on Equity -122.95 % industry aggregate -143.55 %
Return on Invested Capital 12.78 % 5.25 % (avg) 7.53 %

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.

Greensky Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory

Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.
Metric 2018201920202021
Revenue Growth -27.73 %-0.64 %-1.56 %
Operating Margin -5.31 %22.73 %10.34 %31.12 %
Return on Invested Capital 20.19 %20.07 %5.78 %12.78 %
P/E --26.3x23.0x

Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.

Greensky Inc's Strategic Group Map

Every company in Greensky Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Greensky Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.

Revenue Growth (TTM, %)Operating Margin (%)FISVCASSGreensky IncHQICDKWEXPDMWBMDPLPM

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.

Greensky Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)

Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.
Force Assessment Basis
Barriers to Entry Lower than typical for the industry Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 3.01 % vs industry average 4.25 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above)
Supplier Power Not covered on this page See Greensky Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data
Buyer Power Not covered on this page See Greensky Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data
Threat of Substitutes - No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated

Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.

Greensky Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength

A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.

High Strength
Medium Strength
Low Strength
High Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Invest / Grow
Selective
Medium Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Selective
Harvest
Low Attractiveness
Selective
Harvest Greensky Inc
Harvest / Divest

Greensky Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.

Greensky Inc's SWOT

Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.

Strengths

  • Operating margin 24.9 points above the industry median.

Weaknesses

  • Return on equity 143.6 points below the industry aggregate.

Opportunities

  • Trades at a lower P/E than the industry average (23.0x vs 25.6x) despite a higher return on invested capital -- a possible re-rating opportunity.
  • A meaningful share of tracked competitors (50.00 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.

Threats

  • Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-7.6% annualized).

Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.

Greensky Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison

Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months
CompanyQuick RatioWorking CapitalDebt / EquityAsset Turnover
Greensky Inc 1.33 6.87 - 0.39
Truleum Inc 0.00 0.03 - 0.04
Flexshopper Inc 0.09 10.83 3.36 0.79

Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Greensky Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers

Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodRevenue Y/YRevenue Q/QIncome Y/YIncome Q/Q
Greensky Inc Q4 2021-0.4 %+0.1 %-18.0 %-51.7 %
Truleum Inc Q1 2024-88.2 %-49.6 %--
Flexshopper Inc Q3 2024+22.9 %+21.5 %+276.9 %-
PEERS TOTAL+4.1 %+4.3 %-7.0 %-40.7 %

Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Greensky Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures

Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodCosts Y/YCosts Q/QCapex Y/YCapex Q/Q
Greensky Inc Q4 2021-27.3 %+68.6 %+75.4 %+8.6 %
Truleum Inc Q1 2024-79.7 %-53.4 %--
Flexshopper Inc Q3 2024--+2.5 %+10.8 %

Greensky Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers

ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover
CompanyROAROIROEReceivables TurnoverInventory Turnover
Greensky Inc 8.96%8.68%-28.56-
Truleum Inc -----
Flexshopper Inc 1.23%1.52%7.19%5.72-

ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).

Greensky Inc's Valuation vs Peers

P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book
CompanyP/EPrice / SalesPEGP/CFPrice / Book
Greensky Inc 20.403.560.0721.75-
Truleum Inc -1,245.45---
Flexshopper Inc -0.00-0.100.01
PEERS AVERAGE16.562.9822.55-

P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.