Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Greenpro Capital's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Greenpro Capital (GRNQ) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q2 2026
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-29.25 %
Q2 2026
Net Margin
-234.77 %
Q2 2026

Key Findings: Greenpro Capital vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 2M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-39.6% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Greenpro Capital ranks #17 of 40 companies by market capitalization in the Consulting Services industry, holding 0.3% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Greenpro Capital accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

GRNQ Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026

Greenpro Capital generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/GRNQ/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/GRNQ/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/GRNQ/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Consulting Services industry grew revenue 9.6% year over year, combined, vs -29.3% for Greenpro Capital. Greenpro Capital's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Greenpro Capital's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Greenpro Capital Corp No No No -
High-Confidence Competitors (3) 100% 0% 0% 100%
Similar-Size Competitors (9) 100% 40% 40% 33%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 12.50 % (1 of 8) 12.50 % (1 of 8) 12.50 % (1 of 8) 14.30 % (1 of 7)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q2 2026

100%market share
  • Greenpro Capital100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Greenpro Capital and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Greenpro Capital's full market share breakdown »

GRNQ Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

GRNQ Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Greenpro Capital's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
0%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(0 of 1)
14.3%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(1 of 7)
0%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(0 of 4)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Greenpro Capital Corp 554.50 % Outperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (7) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (4) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Greenpro Capital's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

GRNQ Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

GRNQ High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 4) Percent change over the selected range

GRNQ Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

GRNQ Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

GRNQ Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

GRNQ Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Greenpro Capital's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company operates in a mature and competitive industry serving small and medium-sized businesses. In Hong Kong, competition is particularly intense, primarily from established law firms and consulting service providers in the corporate finance sector, including Marbury, King & Wood Mallesons, QMIS Financial Group, First Asia Finance Group Limited and their affiliates, as well as certain accounting firms specializing in tax planning and corporate restructuring. Competition is less intense in China and Malaysia. Major competitors in China include JP Investment Group and QMIS Financial Group, while in Malaysia, key competitors are Global Bridge Management Sdn. Bhd. and QMIS Financial Group. These competitors possess significant market presence, established brand recognition, and financial resources. The company identifies principal competitive factors as the quality of analysis, applicability and effectiveness of recommendations, and the strength and depth of client relationships.

Greenpro Capital's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Global Bridge Management Sdn. Bhd. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
QMIS Financial Group Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Atif Holdings Ltd Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Marbury Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
JP Investment Group Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
First Asia Finance Group Limited Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Seatech Ventures Corp Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
King & Wood Mallesons Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Greenpro Capital's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Get the full CSIMarket dataset: Subscribe API License