Great Elm Group Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Great Elm Group Inc (GEG) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Great Elm Group Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 28M vs 104M combined for tracked competitors (21.1% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+52.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs holding steady (+1.6%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Great Elm Group Inc generated 87.9% revenue growth year over year in Q4 2026, vs -6.5% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 10.1% net margin compares with 3.5% for the peer group.
- Scale: Great Elm Group Inc ranks #164 of 259 companies by market capitalization in the Software & Programming industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Great Elm Group Inc accounted for 28.6% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 16.6% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.53M compares with $0.13M for the peer group (4.0x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
GEG Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2026
Great Elm Group Inc reported revenue growth of 87.92 % year on year in Q4 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue change of -6.47 %.
With a net margin of 10.08 %, Great Elm Group Inc achieved higher profitability than its competitors (3.48 %).
Great Elm Group Inc generated 28.57 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 16.60 % a year earlier.
Great Elm Group Inc vs. its Competitors, Q4 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Great Elm Group Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Great Elm Group Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (3) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Great Elm Group Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Software & Programming industry grew revenue 16.0% year over year, combined, vs 87.9% for Great Elm Group Inc. Great Elm Group Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Great Elm Group Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Great Elm Group Inc | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (1) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
GEG Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
GEG Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
GEG Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Saga Communications inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Great Elm Group Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Great Elm Group Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Great Elm Group Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Great Elm Group Inc | 65.12 | 27.78 |
| Saga Communications inc | 50.60 | 103.94 |
| SUBTOTAL | 115.72 | 131.72 |
Sources: Great Elm Group Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Great Elm Group Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Great Elm Group Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Great Elm Group Inc | 65 | 534,154 | -709,769 |
| Saga Communications inc | 51 | 133,427 | -11,461 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 51 | 133,427 | -11,461 |
Great Elm Group Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 235 companies in Great Elm Group Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Great Elm Group Inc ranks #164 of 235 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 2,652, indicating a highly concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Microsoft Corporation | 3,767,678 | 50.21 % |
| 2 | Palantir Technologies Inc | 480,175 | 6.40 % |
| 3 | Oracle Corporation | 389,514 | 5.19 % |
| 4 | Sap Se | 275,412 | 3.67 % |
| 5 | Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Shopify Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Salesforce Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Servicenow Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Cloudflare Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 164 | Great Elm Group Inc | 65 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Great Elm Group Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Great Elm Group Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 159 | Carecloud Inc | 88 | -38.39 % |
| 160 | Audioeye Inc | 84 | -52.63 % |
| 161 | Fatpipe Inc | 73 | -18.65 % |
| 162 | Alarum Technologies Ltd | 70 | -88.02 % |
| 163 | Cango inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 164 | Great Elm Group Inc | 65 | - |
| 165 | Netsol Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 166 | Airship Ai Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 167 | Playstudios Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 168 | Where Food Comes From Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 169 | Skillsoft Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Great Elm Group Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-29. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Great Elm Group Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Software & Programming industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (343 companies). See the full Software & Programming industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | - | 64.28 % (avg) | - |
| Operating Margin | -50.44 % | industry median | -47.7 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -112.46 % | 2.53 % (avg) | -115.0 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.00 % | 4.79 % (avg) | -4.8 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Great Elm Group Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Software & Programming industry average (343 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Software & Programming industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 39.5x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 21.7x | - |
| P/B | 1.1x | 5.4x | -4.3x |
| Return on Equity | -60.39 % | industry aggregate | -85.59 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -7.32 % | -0.26 % (avg) | -7.06 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Great Elm Group Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | - | 230.05 % | - | 73.74 % | 17.77 % |
| Operating Margin | -7.25 % | 2.02 % | -12.72 % | - | -39.01 % | -53.01 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -2.24 % | 0.14 % | -3.48 % | -5.71 % | -3.53 % | -5.25 % |
| P/E | - | - | 31.4x | 4.9x | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Great Elm Group Inc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Great Elm Group Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Great Elm Group Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Great Elm Group Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Great Elm Group Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Great Elm Group Inc falls in the Question Mark quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 11.6% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Microsoft Corporation alone holds 50% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
Great Elm Group Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Low | Industry HHI of 2,652 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 4.79 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Great Elm Group Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Great Elm Group Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Great Elm Group Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Great Elm Group Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Great Elm Group Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+52.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 47.7 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 85.6 points below the industry aggregate.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 11.6% median pace.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Microsoft Corporation, holding 50.21 % of industry market cap.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Great Elm Group Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Great Elm Group Inc | 5.53 | 14.34 | 1.01 |
| Saga Communications inc | 1.09 | 2.68 | 0.04 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Great Elm Group Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Great Elm Group Inc | Q2 2026 | +87.9 % | -93.2 % |
| Saga Communications inc | Q2 2026 | -6.5 % | -18.6 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +9.2 % | -88.2 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Great Elm Group Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Great Elm Group Inc | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| Saga Communications inc | Q2 2026 | - | -4.0 % |
Great Elm Group Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Great Elm Group Inc | - | - | - |
| Saga Communications inc | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Great Elm Group Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Great Elm Group Inc | - | 2.34 |
| Saga Communications inc | - | 0.49 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | - | 0.88 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.